Akratic believing?

Philosophical Studies

Volumn 110, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 1-27

  Adler, Jonathan E ^a  

^a CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 52649115304     PISSN: 00318116     EISSN: 15730883     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1019823330245     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Adler, J. (2002): Belief's Own Ethics, Cambridge: The MIT Press.
2. Arpaly, N. (2000): 'On acting rationally against one's best judgment', Ethics 110, 488-513.
3. Brandom, R.B. (1994): Making it explicit, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
4. Burge, T. (1993): 'Content Preservation', The Philosophical Review 102, 457-488.
5. Cohen, L.J. (1977): The Probable and the Provable, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
6. Davidson, D. (1982): 'How is weakness of will possible?', Essays on Actions and Events (pp. 21-42). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
7. Davidson, D. (1985): Reply to Bruce Vermazen (pp. 217-221), Vermazen and Hintikka.
8. Davidson, D. (1986): 'Deception and Division', in J. Elster (ed.), The Multiple Self (pp. 79-92), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9. Davidson, D. (1999): Reply to Ariela Lazar (pp. 401-405), Hahn.
10. Hahn, L.E. (ed.) (1999): The Philosophy of Donald Davidson, Chicago: Open Court.
11. Harman, G. (1986): Change of View, Cambridge: The MIT Press.
12. Heil, J. (1984): 'Doxastic Incontinence', Mind 93, 56-70.
13. Holton, R. (1999): 'Intention and Weakness of Will', The Journal of Philosophy XCVI, 241-262.
14. Hurley, S. (1989): Natural Reasons, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
15. James, W. (1951): 'The Will to Believe', in A. Castelli (ed.), Essays on Pragmatism (pp. 88-109), New York: Harner Publishing Co.
16. Jeffrey, R. (1970): 'Dracula meets Wolfman: Acceptance vs. Partial Belief', in M. Swain (ed.), Induction, Acceptance, and Rational Belief (pp. 157-185), Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
17. Jeffrey, R. (1983): The Logic of Decision Second Edition, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
18. Kaplan, M. (1996). Decision Theory as Philosophy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19. Lazar, A. (1999): Akrasia and the Principle of Continence (pp. 381-401), Hahn.
20. Levi, I. (1981): The Enterprise of Knowledge, Cambridge: The MIT Press.
21. McIntyre, A. (1993): 'Is Akratic Action always Irrational?' in O. Flanagan and A. Rorty (eds.), Identity, Character, and Morality (pp. 379-400), Cambridge: The MIT Press.
22. Mele, A. (1987): Irrationality, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
23. Mele, A. (2001): Self-Deception Unmasked, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
24. Millgram, E. (1997): Practical Induction, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
25. Raz, J. (1990): Practical Reason and Norms, 2nd edition, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
26. Richardson, H. (1994): Practical Reasoning about Final Ends, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27. Rorty, A. (1983): 'Akratic Believers', American Philosophical Quarterly 20, 175-183.
28. Scanlon, T.M. (1998): What We Owe to Each Other, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
29. Velleman, J.D. (2000): The Possibility of Practical Reason, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
30. Vermazen, B. (1985): Negative Acts (pp. 93-104), Vermazen and Hintikka.
31. Vermazen, B. and Hintikka, M. (1985): Essays on Davidson, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
32. Wallace, R.J. (2001): 'Normativity, Commitment, and Instrumental Reason', Philosophers' Imprint 1, 1-26 〈www.philosophersimprint.org/001003〉.
33. Williams, B.A.O. (1973): 'Ethical Consistency', Problems of the Self, 166-186.
34. Williams, B.A.O. (1973): 'Deciding to believe', Problems of the Self.
35. Williams, B.A.O. (1973): Problems of the Self, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
36. Williams, B.A.O. (1985): Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.