The new bureaucracies of virtue or when form fails to follow function

Political and Legal Anthropology Review

Volumn 30, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 192-209

  Bosk, Charles L ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 52649102990     PISSN: 10816976     EISSN: 15552934     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1525/pol.2007.30.2.192     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Bledsoe, Caroline., Bruce Sherrin., Nathalia Headley., Carol Heimer., Eric Kjeldgard., James Lindern., Jon Miller., Michael Roloff., and David Uttall., 2006 Regulating Creativity: Research and Survival in the IRB Iron Cage. Northwestern University Law Review.
2. Bosk, Charles., 2001 Irony, Ethnography and Informed Consent. InBioethics in Social Context. BarryHoffmaster, ed.Pp.199-220. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
3. Bosk, Charles., 2004 The Ethnographer and the IRB: Comment on Kevin D. Haggerty, Ethics Creep: Governing Social Science in the Name of Ethics. Qualitative Sociology 27(4): 417-420.
4. Bosk, Charles., and Raymond DeVries., 2004 Bureaucracies of Mass Deception: Institutional Review Boards and the Ethics of Ethnographic Research. Annals of Political and Social Science 595(1): 249-263.
5. Bradburd, Donald., 2006 Fuzzy Boundaries and Hard Rules: Unfunded Research and the IRB. American Ethnologist 33(4): 492-498.
6. Dingwall, Robert., 2006 Confronting the Anti-Democrats: The Unethical Nature of Ethical Regulation in Social Science. Plenary Address to BSA Medical Sociology Group Annual Conference, Edinburgh, September.
7. Garfinkel, Harold., 1967 Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
8. Goffman, Erving., 1961 Encounters. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.
9. Haggerty, Kevin., 2004 Ethics Creep: Governing Social Science in the Name of Ethics. Qualitative Sociology 27(4): 391-414.
10. Hamburger, Philip., 2005 The New Censorship: Institutional Review Boards. The Supreme Court Review 2004: 271-354.
11. Jacob, Marie-Andrée., 2007 Form-Made Persons: Consent Forms as Consent’s Blind Spots. Political and Legal Anthropology Review 30(2).
12. Katz, Jack., 2006 Ethical Escape Routes for Underground Ethnographers. American Ethnologist 33(4): 499-506.
13. Lederman, Rena., 2006 The Perils of Working at Home: IRB “Mission Creep” as Context and Content for an Ethnography of Disciplinary Knowledge. American Ethnologist 33(4): 482-491.
14. Lederman, Rena., 2007 Comparative “Research”: A Modest Proposal concerning the Object of Research Regulation. Political and Legal Anthropology Review 30(2).
15. Merton, Robert K., 1957 Social Theory and Social Structure. New York: The Free Press.
16. Shannon, Jennifer., 2007 Informed Consent: Documenting the Intersection of Bureaucratic Regulation and Ethnographic Practice. Political and Legal Anthropology Review 30(2).