Evaluation at university and state eevee in itaey: Need for a system of evaluation and indicators

Tertiary Education and Management

Volumn 7, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 149-162

  Biggeri, Luigi ^a   Bini, Matilde ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORENCE   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 52549096739     PISSN: 13583883     EISSN: 15731936     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13583883.2001.9967048     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Biggeri, L. (1999). Autonomia e Valutazione dell'Insegnamento, nel Sistema Universitario Italiano. Atti del Convegni dell'Accademia del Lincei, Giornata di Studio su "L'lnsegnamento Universitario in Italia". Rome, 21 January.
2. Biggeri, L., Bini, M. Grilli, L. (1999). The Transition from University to Work: A Multilevel Approach to the Analysis of the Time to Get the First Job. Working Papers no. 79, Firenze: Dipartimento di Statistica.
3. Biggeri, L. Scarpitti, L. (1998). Evaluation in the Italian University System. International Conference on "Evaluation: Profession, Business or Politics?" Rome, 29-31 October.
4. Bini, M. (1999). Valutazione dell'Efficacia dell'Istruzione Universitaria Rispetto al Mercato del Lavoro. Roma: MURST - Osservatorio per la Valutazione del Sistema Universitario.
5. Ewell, P.T. (1999). Linking Performance Measures to Resource Allocation: Exploring Unmapped Terrain. Quality in Higher Education 5(3), 191-208.
6. Goldstein, H. (1995). Multilevel Statistical Models. Eondon: Edward Arnold.
7. Goldstein, H. Woodhouse, G. (1988). Educational Performance Indicators and EEA Eeague Tables. Oxford Review of Education 14(3), 301-320.
8. Hirschberg, J.G., Maasoumi, E. Slottje, D.J. (1991). Cluster Analysis for Measuring Welfare and Quality of Eife Across Countries. Journal of Econometrics 50, 131-150.
9. Kilgore, K.M. (1995). Measuring Outcomes in the Postacute Continuum. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 76,21-26.
10. OECD (1997). Education at a Glance: OECD Indicators. Parigi: CERI.
11. Osservatorio per la Valutazione del Sistema Universitario (1998). Indicazioni per la Preparazione delle Relazioni del Nuclei di Valutazione Interna e Insieme Minima di Indicatori. Rome: MURST - Osservatorio per la Valutazione del Sistema Universitario.
12. Osservatorio per la Valutazione del Sistema Universitario (2000). Informazioni e Dati ehe i Nuclei di Valutazione degli Atenei sono Tenuti a Comunicare nell 'Anno 2000. Rome: MURST - Osservatorio per la Valutazione del Sistema Universitario.
13. Sarrico, C.S. et al. (1997). Data Envelopment Analysis and University Selection. Journal of the Operational Research Society 48, 1163-1177.
14. Schmilz, C.C. (1993). Assessing the Validity of Higher Education Indicators. Journal of Higher Education 64(5), 575-521.
15. Smith, P. (1990). The Use of Performance Indicators in the Public Sector. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A 153, 53-72.
16. Smith, P. (1995). On the Unintended Consequences of Publishing Performance Indicators in the Public Sector. International Journal of Public Administration 18, 277-310.
17. Yorke, M. (1998). Performance Indicators Relating to Student Development: Can They be Trusted? Quality in Higher Education 4(1), 45-61.