Linking performance measures to resource allocation: Exploring unmapped terrain

Quality in Higher Education

Volumn 5, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 191-209

  Ewell, Peter T ^a  

^a National Center for Higher Education Management Systems   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0344786282     PISSN: 13538322     EISSN: 14701081     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/1353832990050302     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Astin, A.W., 1991. Assessment For Excellence: the philosophy and practice of assessment and evaluation in higher education, New York: Macmillan.
2. Banta, T.W., Lambert, E.W., Pike, G.R., Schmidhammer, J.L., and Schneider, J.A., 1987. Estimated score gain on the ACT COMP Examination: valid tool for institutional assessment?. Research in Higher Education, 27: 195–217.
3. Banta, T.W., Rudolph, L., Van Dyke, J., and Fisher, H., 1996. Performance funding comes of age in Tennessee. Journal of Higher Education, 67(1): 23–45.
4. Bottrill, K.V., and Borden, V.M.H., 1994. “ Appendix: Examples from the Literature ”. In Using Performance Indicators to Guide Strategic Decision Making, New Directions for Institutional Research, Edited by: Borden, V., and Banta, T., Vol. No. 82, 107–120. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
5. Burke, J.C., 1997. Performance Funding Indicators: what do they say about concerns, values, and models for State Baccalaureate Institutions?, Albany, NY: Rockefeller Institute of Government of the State University of New York.
6. Colorado Commission on Higher Education. 1997. CCHE Performance Indicators, Denver, CO: Colorado Commission on Higher Education.
7. Davis, D., 1996. The Real World of Performance Indicators: a review of their use in selected Commonwealth countries, London, UK: Commonwealth Higher Education Management Service (CHEMS).
8. Education Commission of the States. 1995. Making Quality Count in Undergraduate Education: a report for the ECS chairman's ‘Quality Counts’ agenda in higher education, Denver, CO: Education Commission of the States.
9. Ewell, P.T., 1997. Putting it all on the line: South Carolina's performance funding initiative. Assessment Update, 9(1): 9–11.
10. Ewell, P.T., 1994. “ Developing statewide performance indicators for higher education: policy themes and variations ”. In Charting Higher Education Accountability: a sourcebook on state-level performance indicators, Edited by: Ruppert, S., 147–166. Denver, CO: Education Commission of the States.
11. Ewell, P.T., and Jones, D.P., 1994. “ Pointing the way: indicators as policy tools in higher education ”. In Charting Higher Education Accountability: a sourcebook on state-level performance indicators, Edited by: Ruppert, S., 6–16. Denver, CO: Education Commission of the States.
12. Ewell, P.T., and Jones, D.P., 1996. Indicators of ‘Good Practice’ in Undergraduate Education: a handbook for development and implementation, Boulder, CO: National Center for Higher Education Management Systems.
13. Ewell, P.T., Wellman, J.T., and Paulson, K., 1997. Refashioning Accountability: toward a ‘distributed’ system of quality assurance for higher education, Denver, CO: Education Commission of the States.
14. Higher Education Funding Council for England. 1993. Annual Report: promoting quality and opportunity, Bristol, UK: HEFCE.
15. Jones, D.P., 1984. Higher Education Budgeting at the State Level: concepts and principles, Boulder, CO: National Center for Higher Education Management Systems.
16. Jones, D.P., 1995. Strategic budgeting: the Board's role in public colleges and universities, AGB Occasional Paper No. 28 Washington, DC: Association of Governing Boards of Colleges and Universities.
17. Jongbloed, B.W.A., and Westerheijden, D.F., 1994. “ Performance indicators and quality assessment in European higher education ”. In Using Performance Indicators to Guide Strategic Decision Making, New Directions for Institutional Research, Edited by: Borden, V., and Banta, T., Vol. No.82, 37–50. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
18. Kells, H.R., ed. 1990. The Development of Performance Indicators for Higher Education: a compendium for eleven countries, Paris: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development.
19. Kells, H.R., ed. 1993. The Development of Performance Indicators for Higher Education: a compendium for twelve countries, Paris: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development.
20. Linke, R., 1991. Performance Indicators in Higher Education: report of a trial evaluation study, Canberra, Australia: Australian Government Publishing Service.
21. National Center for Higher Education Management Systems. 1992. An Evaluation of the Ohio Selective Excellence Program, Boulder, CO: National Center for Higher Education Management Systems.
22. National Center for Higher Education Management Systems. 1994. A preliminary study of the feasibility and utility for National Policy of ‘Good Practice’ indicators in undergraduate education, Washington, DC: Office of Educational Research and Improvement, US Department of Education.
23. Richardson, R.C., Jr. 1994. “ Effectiveness in undergraduate education: an analysis of State quality indicators ”. In Charting Higher Education Accountability: a sourcebook on state-level performance indicators, Edited by: Ruppert, S., 131–146. Denver, CO: Education Commission of the States.
24. Ruppert, S.S., ed. 1994. Charting Higher Education Accountability: a sourcebook on state-level performance indicators, Denver, CO: Education Commission of the States.
25. Seppanen, L.J., 1995. “ Linkages to the world of employment ”. In Student Tracking: new techniques, new demands, new directions in institutional research, Edited by: Ewell, P., Vol. No. 87, 77–92. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
26. Shavelson, R.J., McDonnell, L.M., and Oakes, J. 1989. Indicators for Monitoring Mathematics and Science Education: a sourcebook, Santa Monica, CA: The RAND Corporation.
27. Steele, J.M., Using measures of student outcomes and growth to improve college programs. paper presented at the National Forum of the Association of Institutional Research. May.
28. Stein, R.B., Performance reporting/funding program: Missouri's efforts to integrate state and campus strategic planning. Performance Indicators in Higher Education: what works, what doesn't, and what's next?. College Station, TX. Proceedings from the Pre-Conference Symposium of the 11th AAHE Conference on Assessment and Quality, Edited by: Gaither, G., pp. 36–58. Texas A&M University.
29. Warren Piper, D., “ Performance-related funding as a way of encouraging high-quality performance in higher education: an Australian perspective ”. In Quality Assurance in South African Higher Education: national and international perspectives, Edited by: Strydom, A., Lategan, L., and Muller, A., 244–268. Bloemfontein, South Africa: The University of the Orange Free State.
30. Yorke, M., 1995. Siamese twins? Performance indicators in the service of accountability and enhancement. Quality in Higher Education, 1(1): 13–30.
31. Yorke, M., 1996. Indicators of Programme Quality: a project prepared for HEQC, London, UK: Higher Education Quality Council.