Gender differences in introductory atmospheric and oceanic science exams: Multiple choice versus constructed response questions

Journal of Science Education and Technology

Volumn 10, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 127-136

  Weaver, Andrew J ^a   Raptis, Helen ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VICTORIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Constructed response; Earth science education; Gender differences; Multiple choice; Science education

Indexed keywords

EID: 52549094041     PISSN: 10590145     EISSN: 15731839     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/a:1009464913309     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Ahrens, C. D. (1994). Meteorology Today, An Introduction to Weather, Climate, and the Environment, 4th edn., West Publishing Company, St. Paul, MN, 591 pp.
2. Ahrens, C. D. (1999). Meteorology Today, An Introduction to Weather, Climate, and the Environment, 5th edn., Brooks/Cole, Pacific Grove CA, 528 pp.
3. Allison, D. E. (1984). The effect of item-difficulty sequence, intelligence, and sex on test performance, reliability, and item difficulty and discrimination. Measurement and Evaluation in Guidance 16: 211-217.
4. Barnett-Foster, D., and Nagy, P. (1995). A comparison of undergraduate test response strategies for multiple-choice and constructed-response questions. The Alberta Journal of Educational Research XLI: 18-35.
5. Ben-Shakhar, G., and Sinai, Y. (1991). Gender differences in multiple-choice tests: The role of differential guessing tendencies. Journal of Educational Measurement 28: 23-35.
6. Bolger, N., and Kellaghan, T (1990). Method of measurement and gender differences in scholastic achievement. Journal of Educational Measurement 21:165-174.
7. Breland, H. M., Danos, D. O., Kahn, H. D., Kubota, M. Y., and Bonner, M. W. (1994). Performance versus objective testing and gender: An exploratory study of an advanced placement history examination. Journal of Educational Measurement 31: 275-293.
8. Bridgeman, B., and Lewis, C. (1994). The relationship of essay and multiple-choice scores with grades in college courses. Journal of Educational Measurement 31: 37-50.
9. Chase, C. I. (1968). The impact of some obvious variables on essay test scores. Journal of Educational Measurement 5: 315-318.
10. De Mars, C. E. (1998). Gender differences in mathematics and science on a high school proficiency exam: The role of response format. Applied Measurement in Education 11: 279-299.
11. De Mars, C. E. (2000). Test stakes and item format interactions. Applied Measurement in Education 13: 55-77.
12. Duxbury, A. L., and Duxbury, A. B. (1994). An Introduction to the World's Oceans. W. M. C. Brown Publishers, Dubuque, IA, 472 pp.
13. Garner, M., and Engelhard, G. J. (1999). Gender differences in performance on multiple-choice and constructed response mathematics items. Applied Measurement in Education 12:29-51.
14. Gelargi, A. M. G. (1998). The effects of item order arrangement, change of format, ability and gender on student performance in multiple choice questions in managerial accounting. Accounting Educators' Journal X: 33-46.
15. Hamilton, L. S. (1998). Gender differences on high school science achievement tests: Do format and content matter. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 20: 179-195.
16. Hanna, G. (1986). Sex differences in the mathematics achievement of eighth graders in Ontario. Journal of Research in Mathematics Education 17: 231-237.
17. Heim, A. W., and Watts, K. P. (1967). An experiment on multiple choice versus open-ended answering in a vocabulary test. British Journal of Educational Psychology 37: 339-346.
18. Herlitz, A., Nilsson, L.-G., and Bäckman, L. (1997). Gender differences in episodic memory. Memory and Cognition 25:801-811.
19. Hughes, D. C., Keeling, B., and Tuck, B. F. (1983). Effects of achievement expectations and handwriting quality on scoring essays. Journal of Educational Measurement 20: 65-70.
20. Klimko, I. P. (1984). Item arrangement, cognitive entry characteristics, sex, and test anxiety as predictors of achievement examination performance. The Journal of Experimental Education 52: 214-219.
21. Langenfeld, T E. (1997). Test fairness: Internal and external investigations of gender bias in mathematics testing. Educational Measurement 16: 20-26.
22. Lumsden, K. G., and Scott, A. (1987). The economics student reexamined: Male-female differences in comprehension. Journal of Economic Education 18: 365-376.
23. Maccoby, E. E., and Jacklin, C. N. (1974). The psychology of sex differences, Standard University Press, Stanford, CA, 634 pp.
24. Mazzeo, J., Schmitt, A. P., and Bleistein, C. A. (1993): Sex-related performance differences on constructed-response and multiple-choice sections of advanced placement examinations. College Board Report No. 92-7. College Entrance Examination Board, New York, NY.
25. Meyer, M. R. (1992). Gender differences in test taking: A review. In Romberg, T. A. (Ed.), Mathematics Assessment and Evaluation: Imperatives for Mathematics Educators, State University of New York Press, Albany, NY, 369 pp.
26. Miller, L. D., Mitchell, C. E., and Ausdall, M. V. (1994). Evaluating achievement in mathematics: Exploring the gender biases of timed testing. Education 114: 436-438.
27. Moran, J. M., and Morgan, M. D. (1991). Meteorology: The Atmosphere and the Science of Weather, 3rd edn., MacMillan Publishing Company, New York, NY, 586 pp.
28. Moran, J. M., and Morgan, M. D. (1994). Meteorology: The Atmosphere and the Science of Weather, 4th edn., MacMillan Publishing Company, New York, NY, 517 pp.
29. Moran, J. M., and Morgan, M. D. (1997). Meteorology: The Atmosphere and the Science of Weather, 5th edn., Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 530 pp.
30. Murphy, R. J. L. (1980). Sex differences in GCE examination entry statistics and success rates. Educational Studies 6: 169-178.
31. Murphy, R. J. L. (1982). Sex differences in objective test performance. British Journal of Educational Psychology 52:213-219.
32. Plake, B. S., and Ansorge, C. J. (1984). Effects of item arrangement, sex of the subject, and test anxiety on cognitive and self-perception scores in a nonquantitative content area. Educational and Psychological Measurement 19: 49-57.
33. Plake, B. S., Ansorge, C. J., Parker, C. S., and Lowry, S. R. (1982). Effects of item arrangement, knowledge of arrangement, and test anxiety, and sex on test performance. Journal of Educational Measurement 44: 423-430.
34. Rowley, G. L. (1974). Which examinees are most favoured by the use of multiple choice tests. Journal of Educational Measurement 11: 15-23.
35. Skinnner, N. F. (1983). Switching answers on multiple-choice questions: Shrewdness or shibboleth? Teaching of Psychology 10: 220-222.
36. Slakter, M. J. (1968). The effect of guessing strategy on objective test scores. Journal of Educational Measurement 5: 217-222.
37. Ryan, K. E., and Fan, M. (1996). Examining gender DIF on a multiple-choice test of mathematics: A confirmatory approach. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice 15: 15-20.
38. Traub, R. E. (1992). On the equivalence of traits assessed by multiple choice and constructed response tests. In Bennett, R., and Ward, W. (Eds.), Construction versus choice in cognitive measurement, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 29-44.
39. Walstad, W. B., and Robson, D. (1997). Differential item functioning and male-female differences on multiple-choice tests in economics. Journal of Economic Education 16: 155-171.
40. Wester, A., and Henriksson, W (2000). The interaction between item format and gender differences in mathematics performance based on TIMSS Data. Studies in Educational Evaluation 26: 79-90.