Innovation systems are self-organizing complex adaptive systems

AAAI Spring Symposium - Technical Report

Volumn SS-08-03, Issue , 2008, Pages 142-148

  Yilmaz, Levent ^a  

^a AUBURN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CO-EVOLUTION; COMPLEX ADAPTIVE SYSTEMS; CONFLICT RESOLUTIONS; DIFFERENT SCALES; EVOLUTION PROCESSES; INNOVATION SYSTEMS; INTERACTING AGENTS; OPEN SOURCE SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT; ORGANIZATIONAL DESIGNS; ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURING; SELF-ORGANIZING; STRUCTURE AND DYNAMICS; TECHNICAL REPORTS; USER INNOVATION;

CHLORINE COMPOUNDS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE; COORDINATION REACTIONS; DECISION MAKING; GOVERNMENT DATA PROCESSING; INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS; MACHINE DESIGN; MECHANISMS; OPEN SYSTEMS; PROBLEM SOLVING; SPRINGS (COMPONENTS); TECHNOLOGY;

ADAPTIVE SYSTEMS;

EID: 52449097794     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. Amabile, M. T. 1988. Model of creativity and innovation in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior 10:123-167.
2. Amabile, M. T. 1996. Creativity in Context: Update to the Social Psychology of Creativity. Boulder, CO: Westview.
3. Anderson, N.; Dreu, K. C.; and Nijstad, A. B. 1990. The routinization of innovation research: A constructively critical review of the state-of-the-science. Journal of Organizational Behavior 25:147-173.
4. Burt, S. R. 1992. Structural Holes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
5. Csikszenthmihalyi, M. 1999. Implications of a systems perspective for the study of creativity. Handbook of Creativity 313-338.
6. Dhanaraj, C., and Parkhe, A. 2006. Orchestrating innovation networks. Academy of Management Review 31(3):659-669.
7. Furst, S.; Blackburn, R.; and Rosen, B. 1999. Virtual teams: A proposed agenda for research. Information Systems Journal 9:249-269.
8. Holland, J. H. 1995. Hidden Order: How Adaptation Builds Complexity. Perseus Books.
9. Kanter, M. R. 1988. When a thousand flowers bloom: Structural, collective, and social conditions for innovation in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior 10:123-167.
10. Kilduff, M., and Tsai, W. 2006. Social Networks and Organizations. SAGE Publications.
11. Kurtzberg, R. T., and Amabile, M. T. 2001. From guilford to creative synergy: Opening the black box of team level creativity. Creativity Research Journal 13:285-294.
12. Miller, J. H., and Page, S. E. 2007. Complex Adaptive Systems: An Introduction to Computational Models of Social Life. Princeton: Princeton UNiversity Press.
13. Mullen, B.; Johnson, C.; and Salas, E. 1990. Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: A meta-analytic integration. Basic and Applied Social Psychology 12:3-23.
14. NSF. 2006. Final report from the nsf innovation and discovery workshop: The scientific basis of individual and team innovation and discovery. Technical report, National Science Foundation, Arlington, VA, USA.
15. Powell, W. W.; Koput, W. K.; and Smith-Doerr, L. 1996. Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly 41:116-145.
16. Rowley, J. T. 2001. Moving beyond dyadic ties: A network theory of stakeholder influences. Academy of Management Review 22:887-910.
17. Tangmunarunkit, H.; Govindran, R.; Jamin, S.; Shenker, S.; and Willingner, W. 2001. Network topology generators: Degree-based vs. structural. Proceedings of the ACM Special Interest Group on Data Communications (SIGCOMM). 37-45.
18. van Wendel de Joode, R.; de Bruijn, J. A.; and van Eete, M. J. G. 2003. Protecting the Virtual Commons: Self-Organizing Open Source and Free Software Communities and Innovative Intellectual Property Regimes. The Hague: T. M. C. Asser Press.
19. von Hippel, E. 2001. Innovation by user communities: Learning from open-source software. MIT Sloan Management Review Summer 2001:82-86.
20. Vroom, V H. 1964. Work and Motivation. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
21. West, A. M., and Farr, L. J. 1990. Innovation at work. Innovation and creativity at work: Psychological and organizational strategies.