Effective design rationale: Understanding the barriers

Rationale Management in Software Engineering

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 73-90

  Horner, John ^a   Atwood, M E ^a  

^a Drexel University   (United States)

Author keywords

design rationale; design theory; information retrieval

Indexed keywords

ENGINEERING; INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL;

DESIGN ISSUES; DESIGN PROCESS; DESIGN RATIONALE; DESIGN RESEARCH; DESIGN THEORY; EFFECTIVE DESIGNS; INHERENT LIMITATIONS;

DESIGN;

EID: 52249113719     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-30998-7_3     Document Type: Chapter

References (30)

1. Alexander C (1979) The Timeless Way of Building. Oxford University Press, Oxford
2. Atwood ME, McCain KW, Williams JC (2002) How does the design community think about design? In: Symposium on Designing Interactive Systems, pp. 125-132
3. Belkin N (1980) Anomalous states of knowledge as a basis for information retrieval. Can. J. Inform. Sci., 5:133-143
4. Brooks FP (1995) The Mythical Man-Month: Essays on Software Engineering. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA
5. Brown J, Duguid P (2000) The Social Life of Information. Harvard Business School Press
6. Conklin J, Burgess-Yakemovic KC (1991) A process-oriented approach to design rationale. Hum.-Comput. Interact., 6 (3-4):357-391
7. Fischer G. (2004) Social creativity: Turning barriers into opportunities for collaborative design. In: Proceeding from Participatory Design Conference, pp. 152-161
8. Friedman K (2003) Theory construction in design research: criteria: approaches, and methods. Des. Stud. 24(6):507-522
9. Gruber T, Russell D (1996) Generative design rationale. Beyond the record and replay paradigm. In: Moran TP, Carroll JM (eds.) Design Rationale: Concepts, Techniques, and Use. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah NJ
10. Grudin J (1994) Groupware and social dynamics: eight challenges for developers. Commun. ACM 37(1):92-105
11. Grudin J (1996) Evaluating opportunities for design capture. In: Moran TP, Carroll JM (eds.) Design Rationale: Concepts, Techniques, and Use. Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah NJ
12. Herbsleb JD, Kuwana E (1993) Preserving knowledge in design projects: What designers need to know. In: Proceedings of Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 7-14
13. Janis IL (1972) Victims of Group Think: A Psychological Study of Foreign Policy Decisions and Fiascos. Houghton-Mifflin, Boston MA
14. Karsenty, L (1996) An empirical evaluation of design rationale documents. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, New York, pp. 150-156
15. Lee J, Lai KY (1991) What's in design rationale? Human-Computer Interaction 6 (3-4):251-280
16. Lewis C, Reiman J, Bell B (1996) Problem centered design for expressiveness and facility in a graphical programming system. In Moran TP, Carroll JM (eds.) Design Rationale: Concepts, Techniques, and Use. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah NJ, pp. 147-183
17. MacLean A, Young RM, Bellotti VME, Moran TP (1991) Questions, options, and criteria: Elements of design space analysis. Hum.-Comput. Int. 6 (3-4):201-250
18. Muller MJ, Carey K (2002) Design as a minority discipline in a software company: Towards requirements for a community of practice.. In: Proceedings from CHI, ACM, New York, pp. 383-390
19. Norman DA (1990) The Design of Everyday Things. Doubleday, New York
20. Polanyi M (1966) The Tacit Dimension. Doubleday, New York
21. Rittel H, Weber M (1984) Planning problems are wicked problems. In: Cross N (ed.), Developments in Design Methodology, Chichester. Wiley, New York, pp. 135-144
22. Schön DA (1987) Educating the reflective practitioner: toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions.. Jossey-Bass.
23. Sharrock W, Anderson R (1996) Synthesis organizational innovation and the articulation of design space. In: Moran TP, Carroll JM (eds.) Design rationale: Concepts, Techniques, and Use. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah NJ
24. Shipman F, McCall R (1999) Incremental formalization with the hyperobject substrate, ACM Trans. Inform. Syst. 17:199-227
25. Buckingham Shum S, Hammond N (1994) Argumentation-based design rationale: What use at what cost? Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 40(4):603-652
26. Simon HA (1996) The sciences of the artificial, MIT Press, Cambridge MA
27. Tenner E (1996) Why things bite back: technology and the revenge of unintended consequences. Vintage, New York
28. Wenger E (2002) Cultivating communities of practice: A guide to managing knowledge. Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge MA
29. Wilson P (1993) Situational relevance, Info Stor Retrieval, 9:457-471
30. Wolf C, Karat, J (1997) Capturing what is needed in multi-user system design: Observations from the design of three healthcare systems.. In: Proceedings from DIS, ACM, New York, pp. 405-415