Comparative evaluation of 64-slice CT angiography and digital subtraction angiography in assessing the cervicocranial vasculature

Vascular Health and Risk Management

Volumn 4, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 901-907

  Klingebiel, Randolf ^a   Kentenich, Max ^a   Bauknecht, Hans Christian ^a   Masuhr, Florian ^a   Siebert, Eberhard ^a   Busch, Markus ^a   Bohner, Georg ^a  

^a CHARITÉ UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN BERLIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Angiography; CNS; CT angiography

Indexed keywords

IOPROMIDE;

ADULT; ANTERIOR CEREBRAL ARTERY; ARTICLE; CAROTID ARTERY DISEASE; CEREBRAL ARTERY DISEASE; CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY SCANNER; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DIGITAL SUBTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTERNAL CAROTID ARTERY; MALE; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE; POSTERIOR CEREBRAL ARTERY; POSTERIOR INFERIOR CEREBELLAR ARTERY; RADIATION DOSE; RADIATION EXPOSURE; RADIOLOGIST; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY;

ADULT; ANGIOGRAPHY, DIGITAL SUBTRACTION; CEREBRAL ANGIOGRAPHY; CEREBROVASCULAR DISORDERS; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; RADIATION DOSAGE; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 52249109979     PISSN: 11766344     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Bartlett ES, Walters TD, Symons SP, et al. 2006. Quantification of carotid stenosis on CT angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 27:13-19.
2. Bendszus M, Koltzenburg M, Burger R, et al. 1999. Silent embolism in diagnostic cerebral angiography and neurointerventional procedures: a prospective study. Lancet, 354:1594-7.
3. Elijovich L, Kazmi K, Gauvrit JY, et al. 2006. The emerging role of multidetector row CT angiography in the diagnosis of cervical arterial dissection: preliminary study. Neuroradiology, 48:606-12.
4. Heiserman JE, Dean BL, Hodak JA, et al. 1994. Neurologic complications of cerebral angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 15:1401-7.
5. Hu H. 1999. Multi-slice helical CT: scan and reconstruction. Med Phys, 26:5-18.
6. Kaufmann TJ, Huston J 3rd, Mandrekar JN, et al. 2007. Complications of diagnostic cerebral angiography: Evaluation of 19,826 consecutive patients. Radiology, 243:812-19.
7. Klingebiel R, Busch M, Bonner G, et al. 2002. Multi-slice CT angiography in the evaluation of patients with acute cerebrovascular disease - a promising new diagnostic tool. J Neurol, 249:43-9.
8. Landis JR, Koch GG. 1977. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33:159-74.
9. Leffers AM, Wagner A. 2000. Neurologic complications of cerebral angiography. A retrospective study of complication rate and patient risk factors. Acta Radiol, 41:204-10.
10. Marshall NW, Noble J, Faulkner K. 1995. Patient and staff dosimetry in neutoradiological procedures. Br J Radiol, 68:495-501.
11. Osborn AG. 1998. Diagnostic Cerebral Angiography, 2nd Edition. Philadelphia, USA: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins.
12. Pai SB, Varma RG, Kulkarni RN. 2005. Microsurgical anatomy of the middle cerebral artery. Neurol India, 53:186-90.
13. Schuknecht B. 2004. Latest techniques in head and neck CT angiography. Neuroradiology, 46:s208-13.
14. Silvennoinen HM, Ikonen S, Soinne L, et al. 2007. CT angiographic analysis of carotid artery stenosis: Comparison of manual assessment, semiautomatic vessel analysis, and digital subtraction angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 28:97-103.
15. Schellinger PD, Richter G, Köhrmann M, et al. 2007 Noninvasive angiography (magnetic resonance and computed tomography) in the diagnosis of ischemic cerebrovascular disease. Cerebrovasc Dis, 24(Suppl 1):16-23.
16. Tomandl BF, Hammen T, Klotz E, et al. 2006. Bone-subtraction CT angiography for the evaluation of intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 27:55-9.
17. Utter GH, Hollingworth W, Hallam DK, et al. 2006. Sixteen-slice CT angiography in patients with suspected blunt carotid and vertebral artery injuries. J Am Coll Surg, 203:838-8.
18. Villablanca JP, Nael K, Habibi R, et al. 2006. 3 T contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography for evaluation of the intracranial arteries: comparison with time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography and multislice computed tomography angiography. Invest Radiol, 41:799-05.
19. Villablarea JP, Rodriguez FJ, Stockman T, et al. 2007. MDCT angiography for detection and quantification of small intracranial arteries: comparison with conventional catheter angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 188:593-602.
20. Vollmer TL, Guarnaccia J, Harrington W, et al. 1993. Idiopathic granulomatous angiitis of the central nervous system. Diagnostic challenges. Arch Neurol, 50:925-30.