The effects of agent nonverbal communication on procedural and attitudinal learning outcomes

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 5208 LNAI, Issue , 2008, Pages 208-214

  Baylor, Amy L ^a   Kim, Soyoung ^b  

^a FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Yonsei University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Agent nonverbal communication; Attitude change; Gestures; Interface agents; Pedagogical agents; Persuasive technology; Procedural learning

Indexed keywords

AGENT NONVERBAL COMMUNICATION; ATTITUDE CHANGE; DEICTIC GESTURE; DIFFERENTIAL EFFECTS; EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES; FACIAL EXPRESSIONS; FACTORIAL DESIGNS; GESTURES; INTELLIGENT VIRTUAL AGENTS; INTERFACE AGENTS; INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCES; LEARNING OUTCOMES; NON-VERBAL COMMUNICATIONS; PEDAGOGICAL AGENTS; PERSUASIVE TECHNOLOGY; PROCEDURAL LEARNING;

AGENTS; COMMUNICATION; INTELLIGENT AGENTS;

EDUCATION;

EID: 52149111869     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-85483-8_21     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (27)

1. Atkinson, R.K.: Optimizing learning from examples using animated pedagogical agents. Journal of Educational Psychology 94, 416-427 (2002)
2. Moreno, R., Mayer, R.E., Spires, H.A., Lester, J.C.: The case for social agency in computer-based teaching: do students learn more deeply when they interact with animated pedagogical agents? Cognition and Instruction 19, 177-213 (2001)
3. Baylor, A.L.: Expanding preservice teachers' metacognitive awareness of instructional planning through pedagogical agents. Educational Technology. Research & Development 50, 5-22 (2002b)
4. Baylor, A.L., Kim, Y.: Validating Pedagogical Agent Roles: Expert, Motivator, and Mentor. The ED-MEDIA, Honolulu, Hawaii (2003b)
5. Baylor, A.L., Ryu, J.: Does the presence of image and animation enhance pedagogical agent persona? Journal of Educational Computing Research 28, 373-395 (2003)
6. Baylor, A.L., Shen, E., Huang, X.: Which Pedagogical Agent do Learners Choose? The Effects of Gender and Ethnicity. In: The E-Learn World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, & Higher Education, Phoenix, Arizona (2003)
7. Kim, Y., Baylor, A.L., Reed, G.: The Impact of Image and Voice with Pedagogical Agents. In: The E-Learn World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare & Higher Education, Phoenix, Arizona (2003)
8. Allbeck, J., Badler, N.: Representing and Parameterizing Agent Behaviors. In: Prendinger, H., Ishizuka, M. (eds.) Life-like Characters: Tools, Affective Functions and Applications. Springer, Germany (2003)
9. Lester, J., Towns, S., Callaway, C., Voerman, J., Fitzgerald, P.: Deictic and Emotive Communication in Animated Pedagogical Agents. In: Cassel, J., Sullivan, S.P.J., Churchill, E. (eds.) Embodied Conversational Agents. The MIT Press, Cambridge (2001)
10. Baylor, A.L.: The Impact of Pedagogical Agent Image on Affective Outcomes. In: Intelligent User Interface International Conference, San Diego, CA (2005)
11. Baylor, A.L., Plant, E.A.: Pedagogical agents as social models for engineering: The influence of agent appearance on female choice. AI-ED Amsterdam (2005)
12. Baylor, A.L., Shen, E., Warren, D., Park, S.: Supporting learners with math anxiety: The impact of pedagogical agent emotional and motivational support. In: Workshop on Social and Emotional Intelligence in Learning Environments, held at the International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems, Maceió, Brazil (2004)
13. Baylor, A.L., Warren, D., Park, S., Shen, E., Perez, R.: The impact of frustration-mitigating messages delivered by an interface agent AI-ED, Amsterdam (2005)
14. Anderson, J.R., Corbett, A.T., Koedinger, K.R., Pelletier, K.: Cognitive tutors: Lessons learned. The Journal of the Learning Science 4, 167-207 (1995)
15. Aimeur, E., Frasson, C.: Analyzing a new learning strategy according to different knowledge levels. Computers & Education 27, 115-127 (1996)
16. Gertner, A.S., VanLehn, K.: Andes: A coached problem solving environment for physics. In: Gauthier, G., VanLehn, K., Frasson, C. (eds.) ITS 2000. LNCS, vol. 1839, pp. 133- 142. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)
17. Graesser, A., VanLehn, K., Rose, C., Jordan, P., Harter, D.: Intelligent tutoring systems with conversational dialogue. AI Magazine 22, 39-51 (2001)
18. Graesser, A., Moreno, K.N., Marineau, J.C.: AutoTutor improves deep learning of computer literacy: is it the dialogu or the talking head? In: Hoppe, U., Verdejo, F., Kay, J. (eds.) The International Conference of Artificial Intelligence in Education, pp. 47-54. IOS Press, Sydney (2003)
19. Reeves, B., Nass, C.: The Media Equation. CSLI Publications, Stanford (1996)
20. Atkinson, R.K., Mayer, R.E., Merrill, M.M.: Fostering social agency in multimedia learning: Examining the impact of an animated agent's voice. Contemporary Educational Psychology 30, 117-139 (2005)
21. Baylor, A.L., Ryu, J., Shen, E.: The Effects of Pedagogical Agent Voice and Animation on Learning, Motivation and Perceived Persona. ED-MEDIA, Hawaii (2003)
22. Johnson, W.L., Rickel, J.W., Lester, J.C.: Animated pedagogical agents: face-to-face interaction in interactive learning environments. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 11, 47-78 (2000)
23. Lester, J.C., Towns, S.G., Callaway, C.B., Voerman, J.L., FitzGerald, P.J.: Deictic amd Emotive Communication in Animated Pedagogical Agents. In: Sullivant, J. (ed.) Embodied Conversational Agents. MIT Press, Boston (2000)
24. Mousavi, S., Low, R., Sweller, J.: Reducing cognitive load by mixing auditory and visual presentation modes. Journal of Educational Psychology 87, 319-334 (1995)
25. Cassell, J., Sullivan, J., Prevost, S., Churchill, E. (eds.): Embodied Conversational Agents. MIT Press, Cambridge (2000)
26. Lee, K.M., Nass, C.: Designing social presence of social actors in human computer interaction. CHI (2003)
27. Gagne, R.: The Conditions of Learning. Holt, Rinehart & Winston, New York (1985)