A rejection mechanism in 2D bounded confidence provides more conformity

Advances in Complex Systems

Volumn 11, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 529-549

  Huet, S ^a   Deffuant, G ^a   Jager, W ^b  

^a Cemagref   (France)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Attraction and rejection; Bounded confidence model; Consensus; Multidimensional; Opinion dynamics

Indexed keywords

EID: 52149109277     PISSN: 02195259     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1142/S0219525908001799     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (48)

1. Eagly, A. H. and Chaiken, S., The Psychology of Attitudes (Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1993).
2. Mason, W. A., Conrey, F. R. and Smith, E. R., Situating social influence processes: Dynamic, multidimensional flows of influence within social networks, Pers. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 11 (2007) 279-300.
3. Festinger, L., A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance (Stanford University Press, 1957).
4. Moschis, G. P., Social comparison and informal group influence, J. Mktg. Res. 13(3) (1976) 237-244.
5. Price, L. L. and Feick, L. F., The role of interpersonal sources in external search: An informational perspective, Adv. Consum,. Res. 11 (1984) 250-253.
6. Brehm, J. W., A Theory of Psychological Reactance (Academic Press, New York, 1966).
7. Heider, F., Attitudes and cognitive organization, J. Psychol. 21 (1946) 107-112.
8. Rogers, R. W. and Prentice-Dunn, S., Protection motivation theory, in Handbook of Health Behavior Research, ed. Gochman, D. (Plenum, New York, 1997), pp. 113-132.
9. Sherif, M. and Hovland, C. I., Social Judgement (Yale University Press, 1961).
10. Tajfel, H., Differentiation Between Social Groups: Studies in the Social Psychology of Mergroup Relations (Academic Press, London, 1978).
11. Turner, J. C. et al., Rediscovering the Social Groups: A Self-Categorization Theory (Basil Blackwell, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1987).
12. Brewer, M. B., The social self: On being the same and different at the same time, Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 17(5) (1991) 475-482.
13. Eagly, A. H. and Chaiken, S., Process theories of attitude formation and change: Attribution approaches and social judgment theory, in The Psychology of Attitudes, Eagly, S. A. H. C. (ed.) (Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1993), pp. 351-388.
14. Wood, W., et al., Self-definition, defensive processing, and influence: The normative impact of majority and minority groups, J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 71 (1996) 1181-1193.
15. Allport, G. W., Social Psychology (Houghton Mifflin, Boston, 1924).
16. Sherif, M., A. study of some social factors in perception, Arch. Psychol. 27 (1935) 187.
17. Moscovici, S. and Zavalloni, M., The group as a polarizer of attitudes, J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 12 (1969) 125-135.
18. Nowak, A. and Vallacher, R. R., Dynamical Social Psychology (Guilford, New York, 1998).
19. Deffuant, G. et al., Mixing beliefs among interacting agents, Adv. Complex Syst. 3 (2001) 87-98.
20. Galam, S. and Moscovici, S., Towards a theory of collective phenomena: Consensus and attitude changes in groups, J. Soc. Psychol. 21 (1991) 49-74.
21. Hegselmann, R. and Krause, U., Opinion dynamics and bounded confidence models, analysis and simulation, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul. 5(3) (2002).
22. Latané, B., Dynamic social impact: The creation of culture by communication, J. Commun. 46(4) (1996) 13-25.
23. Weisbuch, G. et al., Meet, discuss and segregate! Complexity 7(3) (2002) 55-63.
24. Deffuant, G. et al., How can extremism prevail? A study based on the relative agreement interaction model, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul. 5(4) (2002).
25. Weisbuch, G., Deffuant, G. and Amblard, F., Persuasion dynamics, Physica A 353 (2005) 555-575.
26. Jager, W. and Amblard, F., A. dynamical perspective on attitude change, in NAAC-SOS Conf. 2004 (Jun. 27-29, 2004, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania), http://www.casos.cs.cmu.edu/naacsos
27. Jager, W. and Amblard F., Multiple attitude dynamics in large populations, in Agent 2005 Conference on Generative Social Processes, Models, and Mechanisms (2005).
28. Salzarulo, L., A continuous opinion dynamics model based on the principle of metacontrast, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul. 9(1) (2006).
29. Urbig, D. and Malitz, R., Dynamics of structured attitudes and opinions, in Third Conf. European Social Simulation Association (Sep. 5-8, 2005; Koblenz, Germany).
30. Urbig, D. and Malitz, R., Drifting to more extreme but balanced atttiudes: Multidimensional attitudes and selective exposure, in 4th Conf. European Social Simulation Association (Sep. 10-14, 2007; Toulouse).
31. Axelrod, R., The dissemination of culture: A model with local convergence and global polarization, J. Conflict Resol. 41 (1997) 203-226.
32. Deffuant, G. and Huet, S., Propagation effects of filtering incongruent information, J. Bus. Res. 60 (2007) 816-825.
33. Fortunato, S., et al., Vector opinion dynamics in a bounded confidence consensus model, Int. J. Mod. Phys. C 16 (2005) 1535-1551.
34. Huet, S. and Deffuant, G., When do interactions increase or decrease primacy effect?, in Model-2-Model (2007, Marseille).
35. Jager, W. and Amblard, F., Uniformity, bipolarization and pluriformity captured as generic stylized behavior with an agent-based simlation model of attitude change, Comput. Math. Org. Theor. 10 (2004) 295-303.
36. Carletti, T., Fanelli, D., Guarino, A., Bagnoli, F. and Guazzini, A., Opinion dynamics in an open community, arXiv: 0712.1024.
37. Grimm, V. et al., A. standard protocol for describing individual-based and agent-based models, Ecol. Model. 198 (2006) 115-126.
38. Galam, S., Contrarian deterministic effects on opinion dynamics: "the hung elections scenario", Physica A 333 (2004) 453-460.
39. Borghesi, C. and Galam, S., Chaotic, staggered and polarized dynamics in opinion forming: The contrarian effect, Phys. Rev. E 73 (2006) 066118.
40. de La Lama, M. S., Lopez, J. M. and Wio, H. S., Spontaneous emergence of contrarian-like behaviour in an opinion spreading model, Europhys. Lett. 72 (2005) 851-857.
41. Wio, H. S., de la Lama, M. S. and Lopez, J. M., Contrarian-like behavior and system size stochastic resonance in an opinion spreading model, Physica A. 371 (2006) 108-111.
42. Urbig, D. and Lorenz, J., Communication regimes in opinion dynamics: Changing the number of communicating agents, in Second Conf. European Social Simulation Association (ESSA) (Sep. 16-19, 2004, Valladolid, Spain).
43. Lorenz, J., Continuous opinion dynamics of multidimensional allocation problems under bounded confidence: More dimensions lead to better chances for consensus, Eur. J. Econ. Soc. Syst. 19 (2006) 213-227.
44. Lorenz, J., Fostering consensus in multidimensional continuous opinion dynamics under bounded confidence, in Managing Complexity: Insights, Concepts, Applications, ed. D. Helbing (Budapest Springer Berlin/Heidelberg, Understanding Complex Systems, 2008), pp. 321-334.
45. Lorenz, J., Continuous opinion dynamics under bounded confidence: A survey, Int. J. Mod. Phy. C 18 (2007) 1819-1838.
46. Castellano, C., Fortunato, S. and Loreto, V., Statistical physics of social dynamics (2007), arXiv: 0710.3256.
47. E. Ben-Naim, Krapivsky, P. L. and Redner, S., Bifurcations and patterns in compromise processes, Physica D 184 (2003) 190-204.
48. Laguna, M. F., Abramson, G. and Zanette, D. H., Minorities in a model for opinion formation, Complexity 9 (2004) 31-36.