Competence-driven project portfolio selection, scheduling and staff assignment

Central European Journal of Operations Research

Volumn 16, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 281-306

  Gutjahr, Walter J ^a   Katzensteiner, Stefan ^a   Reiter, Peter ^a   Stummer, Christian ^a   Denk, Michaela ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

^b E Commerce Competence Center   (Austria)

Author keywords

Competence development; Metaheuristics; Optimization; Project portfolio; Project scheduling; Staff assignment

Indexed keywords

EID: 52149104922     PISSN: 1435246X     EISSN: 16139178     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10100-008-0057-z     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Brooks F (1975). The mythical man-month. Addison-Wesley, New York
2. ANK Chen TM Edgington 2005 Assessing value in organizational knowledge creation: considerations for knowledge workers MIS Quart 29 279 309
3. MA Coffin BW Taylor 1996 Multiple criteria R&D project selection and scheduling using fuzzy logic Comput Oper Res 23 207 220
4. D'Aveni RA (1994). Hypercompetition: managing the dynamics of strategic maneuvering. The Free Press, New York
5. Dorigo M and Stützle T (2004). Ant colony optimization. MIT Press, Cambridge
6. Dreyfus H and Dreyfus S (1986). Mind over machine: the power of human intuition and expertise in the era of the computer. The Free Press, New York
7. S Dutta O Narasimhan S Rajiv 1999 Conceptualizing and measuring capabilities: methodology and empirical application Strat Manage J 26 277 285
8. Erpenbeck J, Heyse V (1999) Kompetenzbiographie-Kompetenzmilieu- Kompetenztransfer. QUEM-Report 62, Berlin
9. WJ Gutjahr 2006 On the finite-time dynamics of ant colony optimization Methodol Comput Appl Probab 8 105 133
10. Gutjahr WJ, Katzensteiner S, Reiter P (2007) A VNS algorithm for noisy problems and its application to project portfolio analysis. In: Hromkovic J et al (eds) Proceedings SAGA 2007 (Stochastic algorithms: foundations and applications). LNCS, vol 4665. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 93-104
11. A Haesli P Boxall 2005 When knowledge management meets HR strategy: an exploration of personalization-retention and codification-recruitment configurations Int J Human Resour Manage 16 1955 1975
12. HR-XML Consortium (2007) Competencies (Measurable Characteristics) Recommendation 2006-02-28. Available at http://ns.hr-xml.org/2_4/HR-XML-2_4/CPO/ Competencies.html, last visited: March 30, 2007
13. R Kolisch S Hartmann 2006 Experimental investigation of heuristics for resource-constrained project scheduling: an update Euro J Oper Res 174 23 37
14. R Kolisch K Meyer R Mohr 2005 Maximizing R&D portfolio value Res Technol Manage 48 33 39
15. Michalewicz Z (1996). Genetic algorithms + data structures = evolution programs. Springer, London
16. Michalewicz Z, Arabas J (1994) Genetic algorithms for the 0/1 knapsack problem. In: Proceedings of 8th international symposium on methodologies for intelligent systems. LNCS, vol 869. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 134-143
17. RH Möhring F Stork 2000 Linear preselective policies for stochastic project scheduling Math Methods Oper Res 52 501 515
18. O Ngwenyama A Guergachi T McLaren 2007 Using the learing curve to maximize IT productivity: a decision analysis model for timing software upgrades Int J Product Econ 105 524 535
19. OECD (2006) Main Science and Technology Indicators 2006/2, OECD, Paris
20. R Padman D Zhu 2006 Knowledge integration using problem spaces: a study in resource-constrained project scheduling J Scheduling 9 133 152
21. MA Peteraf 2001 The cornerstones of competitive advantage: a resource-based view Strat Manage J 1 179 191
22. T Stützle HH Hoos 2000 MAX-MIN Ant System Future Generation Comput Syst 16 889 914
23. R Venkatraman S Venkatraman 1995 R&D project selection and scheduling for organizations facing product obsolescence R&D Manage 25 57 70
24. M-C Wu S-H Sun 2006 A project scheduling and staff assignment model considering learning effect Int J Adv Manufact Technol 28 1190 1195