Accelerometer-based wireless body area network to estimate intensity of therapy in post-acute rehabilitation

Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation

Volumn 5, Issue , 2008, Pages

  Choquette, Stéphane ^a,b   Hamel, Mathieu ^a   Boissy, Patrick ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY INSTITUTE OF GERIATRICS OF SHERBROOKE   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE SHERBROOKE   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCELEROMETER; AGED; ARTICLE; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; HUMAN; IMMOBILIZATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEASUREMENT; METHODOLOGY; MOTION ANALYSIS SYSTEM; PHYSIOTHERAPY; ACCELERATION; AMBULATORY MONITORING; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; DISABLED PERSON; EQUIPMENT; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; INSTRUMENTATION; MALE; TELEMETRY; TRANSDUCER;

ACCELERATION; ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; DISABLED PERSONS; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; EQUIPMENT FAILURE ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MONITORING, AMBULATORY; PHYSICAL THERAPY MODALITIES; TELEMETRY; TRANSDUCERS;

EID: 52149091885     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17430003     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1743-0003-5-20     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. State of the science on postacute rehabilitation: setting a research agenda and developing an evidence base for practice and public policy: an introduction. AW Heinemann, JAssist Technol 2008 20 1 55 60
2. Specialist rehabilitation after stroke. J Gladman D Barer P Langhorne, Bmj 1996 312 1623 1624 8664701
3. It's more than a black box; it's a Russian doll: defining rehabilitation treatments. J Whyte T Hart, Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2003 82 639 652 10.1097/00002060-200308000-00012 12872021
4. Effects of augmented exercise therapy time after stroke: a meta-analysis. G Kwakkel R van Peppen RC Wagenaar S Wood Dauphinee C Richards A Ashburn K Miller N Lincoln C Partridge I Wellwood P Langhorne, Stroke 2004 35 2529 2539 10.1161/01.STR.0000143153.76460.7d 15472114
5. The relation between therapy intensity and outcomes of rehabilitation in skilled nursing facilities. DU Jette RL Warren C Wirtalla, Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005 86 373 379 10.1016/j.apmr.2004.10.018 15759214
6. Effects of intensity of rehabilitation after stroke. A research synthesis. G Kwakkel RC Wagenaar TW Koelman GJ Lankhorst JC Koetsier, Stroke 1997 28 1550 1556 9259747
7. Intensity of rehabilitation: some answers and more questions? P Langhorne, J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2002 72 430 431 11909896
8. Impact of intensity of practice after stroke: issues for consideration. G Kwakkel, Disabil Rehabil 2006 28 823 830 10.1080/09638280500534861 16777769
9. Rehabilitation therapy after stroke.[comment]. D Wade, Lancet 1999 354 176 177 10.1016/S0140-6736(99)90064-8 10421294
10. Little therapy, little physical activity: rehabilitation within the first 14 days of organized stroke unit care. J Bernhardt J Chan I Nicola JM Collier, J Rehabil Med 2007 39 43 48 10.2340/16501977-0013 17225037
11. Inactive and alone: physical activity within the first 14 days of acute stroke unit care. J Bernhardt H Dewey A Thrift G Donnan, Stroke 2004 35 1005 1009 10.1161/01.STR.0000120727.40792.40 14988574
12. Une étude de temps et mouvements en réadaptation fonctionnelle intensive: le point de vue des usagers. P Boissy S Choquette K Perreault J Desrosiers the CHARGE team, L'avancement des connaissances et des technologies au service de la personne âgée Actes des échanges cliniques et scientifiques sur le vieillissement Montréal: EDISEM éditeur;, Bernier R, Roy P, 2007 64 81
13. Ambulatory monitoring of activity levels of individuals in the sub-acute stage following stroke: a case series. WH Gage KF Zabjek KM Sibley A Tang D Brooks WE McIlroy, J Neuroeng Rehabil 2007 4 41 10.1186/1743-0003-4-41 17961260
14. Applying the clinical practice improvement approach to stroke rehabilitation: methods used and baseline results. J Gassaway SD Horn G DeJong RJ Smout C Clark R James, Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005 86 S16 S33 10.1016/j.apmr.2005.08.114 16373137
15. Stroke rehabilitation patients, practice, and outcomes: is earlier and more aggressive therapy better? SD Horn G DeJong RJ Smout J Gassaway R James B Conroy, Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005 86 S101 S114 10.1016/j.apmr.2005.09.016 16373145
16. A comparison of work-sampling and time-and-motion techniques for studies in health services research. SA Finkler JR Knickman G Hendrickson M Lipkin Jr WG Thompson, Health Serv Res 1993 28 577 597 8270422
17. Use of time by stroke patients: a comparison of four European rehabilitation centers. L De Wit K Putman E Dejaeger I Baert P Berman K Bogaerts N Brinkmann L Connell H Feys W Jenni, Stroke 2005 36 1977 1983 10.1161/01.STR.0000177871.59003.e3 16081860
18. A wireless body area network of intelligent motion sensors for computer assisted physical rehabilitation. E Jovanov A Milenkovic C Otto PC de Groen, J Neuroeng Rehabil 2005 2 1 6 10.1186/1743-0003-2-6 15740621
19. Cardiovascular stress during a contemporary stroke rehabilitation program: is the intensity adequate to induce a training effect? MJ MacKay-Lyons L Makrides, Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation 2002 83 1378 1383 10.1053/apmr.2002.35089
20. G Welk, Physical activity assessments for health-related research Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics 2002
21. Challenges and opportunities for measuring physical activity in sedentary adults. CE Tudor-Locke AM Myers, 2001 91 100 11227981
22. The eSMAF: a software for the assessment and follow-up of functional autonomy in geriatrics. P Boissy S Briere M Tousignant E Rousseau, BMC Geriatr 2007 7 2 17298673 10.1186/1471-2318-7-2
23. Measuring balance in the elderly: validation of an instrument. KO Berg SL Wood-Dauphinee JI Williams B Maki, Can J Public Health 1992 83 Suppl 2 S7 11 1468055
24. The timed "Up & Go": a test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons.[see comment]. D Podsiadlo S Richardson, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 1991 39 142 148 1991946
25. Mobility after stroke: reliability of measures of impairment and disability. FM Collen DT Wade CM Bradshaw, Int Disabil Stud 1990 12 6 9 2211468
26. Toward a taxonomy of rehabilitation interventions: Using an inductive approach to examine the "black box" of rehabilitation. G Dejong SD Horn JA Gassaway MD Slavin MP Dijkers, Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004 85 678 686 10.1016/j.apmr.2003.06.033 15083447
27. Le Système de mesure de l'autonomie fonctionnelle (SMAF). R Hébert R Carrier A Bilodeau, Revue de gériatrie 1988 13 161 167
28. Wearable wireless body area sensor networks for increased telepresence in geriatric telerehabilitation applications. M Hamel R Fontaine P Boissy, IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine 2007 27 29 37 10.1109/MEMB.2008. 919491
29. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. JM Bland DG Altman, Lancet 1986 1 307 310 2868172
30. Comparing methods of measurement: why plotting difference against standard method is misleading. JM Bland DG Altman, Lancet 1995 346 1085 1087 10.1016/S0140-6736(95)91748-9 7564793
31. A comparison of self-reported and observational work sampling techniques for measuring time in nursing tasks. A Ampt J Westbrook N Creswick N Mallock, J Health Serv Res Policy 2007 12 18 24 10.1258/135581907779497576 17244393
32. Comparison of housestaff's estimates of their workday activities with results of a random work-sampling study. E Oddone S Guarisco D Simel, Acad Med 1993 68 859 861 10.1097/00001888-199311000-00017 8216660