State of the science on postacute rehabilitation: Setting a Research Agenda and developing an evidence base for practice and public policy. An introduction

Assistive Technology

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 55-60

  Heinemann, Allen W ^a  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Health policy; Outcome and process assessment (health care); Outcomes research; Rehabilitation

Indexed keywords

ADVOCACY GROUPS; CRITICAL ISSUES; FUNDING AGENCIES; HEALTH POLICY; INDUSTRY REPRESENTATIVES; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; POLICY MAKERS; PROCESS ASSESSMENTS; REHABILITATION; REHABILITATION OUTCOMES; REHABILITATION SERVICES; RESEARCH AGENDA; TRAINING CENTERS;

HEALTH; HEALTH CARE; KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT; MEDICINE;

RESEARCH;

ACUTE DISEASE; ARTICLE; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HUMAN; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; POLICY; REHABILITATION CENTER; TIME; UNITED STATES;

ACUTE DISEASE; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; HEALTH POLICY; HUMANS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PUBLIC POLICY; REHABILITATION CENTERS; TIME FACTORS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 52149084781     PISSN: 10400435     EISSN: 19493614     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10400435.2008.10131932     Document Type: Review

References (12)

1. Beeuwkes Buntin, M. (2007). Access to postacute rehabilitation. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 88, 1488-1493.
2. Chan, L. (2007). The state of the science: Challenges in designing postacute care payment policy. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 88, 1522-1525.
3. Clohan, D. B., Durkin, E., Hammel, J., et al. (2007). Postacute rehabilitation research and policy recommendations. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 88, 1535-1541.
4. Duncan, P. W., Velozo, C. A., & Sissine, M. E. (2007). State-of- the-science on post-acute rehabilitation: Measurement and methodologies for assessing quality and establishing policy for postacute care. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 88, 1482-1487.
5. Gage, B. (2007). Overview of the CMS patient assessment tool development study. Paper presented at the State of the Science Symposium on Post-acute Rehabilitation: Setting a Research Agenda and Developing an Evidence Base for Practice and Public Policy, Arlington, VA.
6. Johnston, M. V., Graves, D. E., & Greene, M. (2007). The uniform post-acute assessment tool: Systematically evaluating the quality of measurement evidence. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 88, 1505-1512.
7. Kane, R. L. (2007). Assessing the effectiveness of postacute care rehabilitation. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 88, 1500-1504.
8. Kaplan, S. J. (2007). Growth and payment adequacy of post- acute care rehabilitation. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 88, 1494-1499.
9. Medicare Payment Advisory Commission . (2006, June).Adat a book: Heal thc are spending and the Medicare Progr am. Retrieved February 8, 2007, from http ://www.medpac.gov/publicat ions/congressionaLreports/Jun06DataBoolLEntire. report.pdf
10. National Institute of Chi ld Health and Human Development.(2005, Febru ary 14-1 5). Nat ional Insti tu tes of Heal th work-shop to develop a research agenda on appropria te settings for rehabilitat ion. Retrieved February 8, 2007, from http://www.nichd.nih .gov/publi cati ons/pubs/upload/rehab.settings.2005. pdf
11. Ottenbacher, K, & Graham, J. E. (2007). The state of the science: Access to postacute care rehabilitation services. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 88, 1513-1521.
12. Prvu Bettger, J. A., & Stineman, M. G. (2007). The effectiveness of multidisciplinary rehabilitation services in postacute care: State of the science. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 88, 1526-1534.