From symptom relief to interpersonal change: Treatment outcome and effectiveness in inpatient psychotherapy

Psychotherapy Research

Volumn 18, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 615-624

  Haase, Matthias ^a   Frommer, Jörg ^a   Franke, Gabriele Helga ^b   Hoffmann, Thilo ^c   Schulze Muetzel, Jörg ^c   Jäger, Susanne ^d   Grabe, Hans Jörgen ^e   Spitzer, Carsten ^e   Schmitz, Norbert ^f  

^a OTTO VON GUERICKE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b Department of Rehabilitation Psychology   (Germany)

^c AWO Hospital   (Germany)

^d UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES MAGDEBURG STENDAL   (Germany)

^e UNIVERSITY OF GREIFSWALD   (Germany)

^f MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Anxiety; Depression; Dream work; Eating disorders; Process research; Psychoanalytic psychodynamic therapy; Psychotherapist training supervision development; Trauma

Indexed keywords

ADJUSTMENT DISORDER; ANXIETY DISORDER; ART THERAPY; ARTICLE; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEPRESSION; DISSOCIATIVE DISORDER; DISTRESS SYNDROME; EATING DISORDER; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GROUP THERAPY; HOSPITAL PATIENT; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; INTERPERSONAL STRESS; INVENTORY OF INTERPERSONAL PROBLEMS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MUSIC THERAPY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHODYNAMICS; PSYCHOLOGICAL RATING SCALE; PSYCHOLOGICAL WELL BEING; PSYCHOTHERAPY; RELAXATION TRAINING; SOMATOFORM DISORDER; SYMPTOM CHECKLIST 90; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADAPTATION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; ADJUSTMENT DISORDERS; ADULT; ANXIETY DISORDERS; COMBINED MODALITY THERAPY; DEPRESSIVE DISORDER; EATING DISORDERS; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME AND PROCESS ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PATIENT ADMISSION; PERSONALITY INVENTORY; PSYCHOANALYTIC THERAPY; PSYCHOMETRICS; SOMATOFORM DISORDERS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 52049125533     PISSN: 10503307     EISSN: 14684381     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10503300802192158     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Bachrach, H. M., Galatzer-Levy, R., Skolnikoff, A. and Waldron, S. (1991) On the efficacy of psychoanalysis. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 39, pp. 871-916.
2. Barkham, M., Rees, A., Stiles, W. B., Hardy, G. E. and Shapiro, D. A. (2002) Dose-effect relations for psychotherapy of mild depression: A quasi-experimental comparison of effects of 2, 8, and 16 sessions. Psychotherapy Research, 12, pp. 463-474.
3. Beutel, M. F., Hoflich, A., Kurth, R., Brosig, B., Gieler, U., Milch, W. and Reimer, C. H. (2005) Short-term and long-term inpatient psychotherapy: Indication, results, predictors. Zeitschrift für Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie, 51:2, pp. 145-162.
4. Bräutigam, W., Senf, W. and Kordy, H. (1990) pp. 189-208. Springer, Berlin
5. Cohen, J. (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, Academic Press, New York
6. Davies-Osterkamp, S., Strauss, B. M. and Schmitz, N. (1996) Interpersonal problems as predictors of symptom-related treatment outcome in long-term psychotherapy. Psychotherapy Research, 6, pp. 164-176.
7. Derogatis, L. R. (1977) SCL-90-R, administration, scoring and procedures manual-I for the R(evised) version, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
8. Franke, G. H. (2002) Die Symptom-Checkliste von Derogatis - Deutsche version - Manual, ed 2, revised, Beltz, Gottingen, Germany
9. Franke, G. H., Hoffmann, T. and Frommer, J. (2005) Does improvement of symptoms four weeks after the beginning of psychodynamic inpatient psychotherapy correspond to long term outcome?. Zeitschrift für Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie, 51, pp. 360-372.
10. Franz, M., Janssen, P., Lensche, H., Schmidtke, V., Tetzlaff, M. Martin, K. et al. (2000) On the effects of psychoanalytic oriented psychotherapy - An inpatient multicenter study. Zeitschrift für Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie, 46, pp. 242-258.
11. Grissom, G. R., Lyons, J. S. and Lutz, W. (2002) Standing on the shoulders of a giant: Development of an outcome management system based on the dose model and phase model of psychotherapy. Psychotherapy Research, 12, pp. 397-412.
12. Hessel, A., Schumacher, J., Geyer, M. and Brahler, E. (2001) Symptom-Checkliste SCL-90-R. Testtheoretische Überprüfung und Normierung an einer bevölkerungsreprasentativen Stichprobe [Validation and standardization based on a representative sample of the German population]. Diagnostica, 47, pp. 27-39.
13. Heuft, G., Eich, W., Henningsen, P., Janssen, P. L., Merkle, W. Fichter, M. et al. (2002) Psychosomatic and psychotherapeutic medicine goes to DRG - Prozedurenkatalog OPS 301 2.1 als erster Schritt. Zeitschrift für Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie, 48, pp. 90-103.
14. Horowitz, L. M., Strauss, B. and Kordy, H. (2000) Inventar zur Erfassung interpersonaler Probleme, Beltz, Weinheim, Germany
15. Howard, K. I., Kopta, S. M., Krause, M. S. and Orlinsky, D. E. (1989) The dose-effect relationship in psychotherapy. American Psychologist, 41, pp. 159-164.
16. Howard, K. I., Lueger, R. J., Maling, M. S. and Martinovich, Z. (1993) A phase model of psychotherapy outcome: Causal mediation of change. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 61, pp. 678-685.
17. Jacobson, N. S. and Truax, P. (1991) Clinical significance: A statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59, pp. 12-19.
18. Junge, A. and Ahrens, S. (1996) Inpatient psychosomatic treatment-Patient markers and treatment sucess. Psychotherapie, Psychosomatik, Medizinische Psychologie, 46, pp. 430-437.
19. Klose, C., Matteucci-Gothe, R. and Linden, M. (2006) Pre- and post-treatment in inpatient psychosomatic rehabilitation. Rehabilitation, 45, pp. 359-368.
20. Lambert, M. J., Hansen, N. B. and Finch, A. E. (2001) Patient-focused research: Using patient outcome data to enhance treatment effects. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 69, pp. 159-172.
21. Lambert, M. J. and Ogles, B. M. (2004) Bergin and Garfield's handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change, pp. 139-193. Wiley, New York
22. Lang, T. and Hoyer, J. (2003) Klinische Untersuchungsverfahren. Zeitschrift für Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie, 32:4, pp. 332-334.
23. Leichsenring, F. (2005) Are psychodynamic and psychoanalytic therapies effective? A review of empirical data. The International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 86, pp. 841-868.
24. Lueger, R. J. (1995) Ein Phasenmodell der Veränderung in der Psychotherapie. Psychotherapeut, 40, pp. 267-278.
25. Mohr, D. C. (1995) Negative outcome in psychotherapy: A critical review. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 2, pp. 1-27.
26. Rudolf, G., Jakobsen, T., Micka, R. and Schumann, E. (2004) Results of psychodynamic inpatient psychotherapy in relation to diagnosis. Zeitschrift für Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie, 50, pp. 37-52.
27. Sack, M., Lempa, W., Lamprecht, F. and Schmidt-Ott, G. (2003) Individualized therapy goals and treatment efficacy - A follow-up study one year after inpatient psychotherapy. Zeitschrift für Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie, 49, pp. 63-73.
28. Schmitz, N. and Davies-Osterkamp, S. (1997) Klinische und statistische Signifikanz - Diskutiert am Beispiel der Symptom Check Liste (SCL-90-R) [Clinical and statistical significance using the symptom check list (SCL-90-R)]. Diagnostica, 43:1, pp. 80-96.
29. Stiles, W. B. and Shapiro, D. A. (1989) Abuse of the drug metaphor in psychotherapy process-outcome research. Clinical Psychology Review, 9, pp. 521-543.
30. Wuchner, M., Eckert, J. and Biermann-Ratjen, E. M. (1993) Vergleich von Diagnosegruppen und Klientelen verschiedener Kliniken. Gruppenpsychotherapie Gruppendynamik, 29, pp. 198-214.