Genetic analysis of heterosis for yield and yield components in rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) by quantitative trait locus mapping

Genetics

Volumn 179, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 1547-1558

  Radoev, Mladen ^a   Becker, Heiko C ^a   Ecke, Wolfgang ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GÖTTINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CULTIVAR; EPISTASIS; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE INTERACTION; GENE MAPPING; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENETIC TRAIT; GRAIN; HAPLOIDY; HETEROSIS; MARKER GENE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCUS; RAPESEED; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CHROMOSOME MAP; CROSS BREEDING; GENETIC DATABASE; GENETIC EPISTASIS; GENETIC MARKER; GENETICS; GENOTYPE; INHERITANCE; TURNIP;

BRASSICA NAPUS;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BRASSICA RAPA; CHROMOSOME MAPPING; CROSSES, GENETIC; DATABASES, GENETIC; EPISTASIS, GENETIC; GENETIC MARKERS; GENOTYPE; HAPLOIDY; HYBRID VIGOR; INHERITANCE PATTERNS; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCI;

EID: 52049124217     PISSN: 00166731     EISSN: 00166731     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1534/genetics.108.089680     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. BECKER, H. C., 1987 Quantitative Genetik und Zuchtmethodik bei Raps - Versuch einer Literaturübersicht. Bericht über die Arbeitstagung der Saatzuchtleiter in Gumpenstein. Verlag der Bundesanstalt für alpenländische Landwirtschaft. Gumpenstein, Austria, pp. 67-82.
2. CROW, J. F., 1999 Dominance and overdominance, pp. 49-58 in The Genetics and Exploitation of Heterosis in Crops, edited by J. G. COORS and S. PANDEY. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI.
3. DIEPENBROCK, W., and H. C. BECKER, 1995 Physiological Potentials for Yield Improvement of Annual Oil and Protein Crops (Advances in Plant Breeding 17). Blackwell Wiss.-Verl., Berlin/Vienna.
4. FRASCAROLI, E., M. A. CANE, P. LANDI, G. PEA, L. GIANFRANCESCHI et al., 2007 Classical genetic and quantitative trait loci analyses of heterosis in a maize hybrid between two elite inbred lines. Genetics 176: 625-644.
5. GALLAIS, A., and M. RIVES, 1993 Detection, number and effects of QTLs for a complex character. Agronomie 13: 723-738.
6. GOODNIGHT, C. J., 1999 Epistasis and heterosis, pp. 59-68 in The Genetics and Exploitation of Heterosis in Crops, edited by J. G. COORS and S. PANDEY. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI.
7. GRAHAM, G. I., D. W. WOLF and C. W. STUBER, 1997 Characterization of a yield quantitative trait locus on chromozome five of maize by fine mapping. Crop Sci. 37: 1601-1610.
8. JANSEN, R. C., and P. STAM, 1994 High resolution of quantitative traits into multiple loci via interval mapping. Genetics 136: 1447-1455.
9. KUSTERER, B., J. MUMINOVIC, H. F. UTZ, H.-P. PIEPHO, S. BARTH et al., 2007a Analysis of a triple testcross design with recombinant inbred lines reveals a significant role of epistasis in heterosis for biomass-related traits in Arabidopsis. Genetics 175: 2009-2017.
10. KUSTERER, B., H.-P. PIEPHO, H. F. UTZ, C. C. SCHÖN, J. MUMINOVIC et al., 2007b Heterosis for biomass-related traits in Arabidopsis investigated by quantitative trait loci analysis of the triple testcross design with recombinant inbred lines. Genetics 177: 1839-1850.
11. LANDER, E. S., and D. BOTSTEIN, 1989 Mapping Mendelian factors underlying quantitative traits using RFLP linkage maps. Genetics 121: 185-199.
12. LI, Z.-K., L. J. LUO, H. W. MEI, D. L. WANG, Q. Y. SHU et al., 2001 Overdominant epistatic loci are the primary genetic basis of inbreeding depression and heterosis in rice. I. Biomass and grain yield. Genetics 158: 1737-1753.
13. LINCOLN, S. E., M. J. DALY and E. S. LANDER, 1993 Constructing Genetic Linkage Maps With MAPMAKER/EXP 3.0: A Tutorial and Reference Manual. Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research, Cambridge, MA.
14. LOWE, A. J., C. MOULE, M. TRICK and K. J. EDWARDS, 2004 Efficient large-scale development of microsatellites for marker and mapping applications in Brassica crop species. Theor. Appl. Genet. 108: 1103-1112.
15. LU, H., J. ROMERO-SEVERSON and R. BERNARDO, 2003 Genetic basis of heterosis explored by simple sequence repeat markers in a random-mated maize population. Theor. Appl. Genet. 107: 494-502.
16. LUO, L. J., Z.-K. LI, H. W. MEI, Q. Y. SHU, R. TABIEN et al., 2001 Overdominant epistatic loci are the primary genetic basis of inbreeding depression and heterosis in rice. II. Grain yield components. Genetics 158: 1755-1771.
17. MCVETTY, P. B. E., 1995 Review of performance and seed production of hybrid brassicas. Proceedings of the 9th International Rapeseed Congress, Cambridge, UK, pp. 98-103.
18. MEI, H. W., L. J. LUO, C. S. YING, Y. P. WANG, X. Q. YU et al., 2003 Gene actions of QTLs affecting several agronomic traits resolved in a recombinant inbred rice population and two testcross populations. Theor. Appl. Genet. 107: 89-101.
19. MEI, H. W., Z. K. LI, Q. Y. SHU, L. B. GUO, Y. P. WANG et al., 2005 Gene actions of QTLs affecting several agronomic traits resolved in a recombinant inbred rice population and two backcross populations. Theor. Appl. Genet. 110: 649-659.
20. MELCHINGER, A. E., H. F. UTZ, H.-P. PIEPHO, Z.-B. ZENG and C. C. SCHÖN, 2007a The role of epistasis in the manifestation of heterosis: a systems-oriented approach. Genetics 177: 1815-1825.
21. MELCHINGER, A. E., H.-P. PIEPHO, H. F. UTZ, J. MUMINOVIC, T. WEGENAST et al., 2007b Genetic basis of heterosis for growth-related traits in Arabidopsis investigated by testcross progenies of near-isogenic lines reveals a significant role of epistasis. Genetics 177: 1827-1837.
22. MIHALJEVIC, R., H. F. UTZ and A. E.MELCHINGER, 2005 No evidence for epistasis in hybrid and per se performance of elite European flint maize inbreds from generation means and QTL analyses. Crop Sci. 45: 2605-2613.
23. PARKIN, I. A. P., A. G. SHARPE, D. J. KEITH and D. J. LYDIATE, 1995 Identification of the A and C genomes of amphidiploid Brassica napus (oilseed rape). Genome 38: 1122-1131.
24. PATTERSON, H. D., and E. R. WILLIAMS, 1976 A new class of resolvable incomplete block designs. Biometrika 63: 83-92.
25. PIQUEMAL, J., E. CINQUIN, F. COUTON, C. RONDEAU, E. SEIGNORET et al., 2005 Construction of an oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.) genetic map with SSR markers. Theor. Appl. Genet. 111: 1514-1523.
26. SCHUELKE, M., 2000 An economic method for the fluorescent labeling of PCR fragments. Nat. Biotech. 18: 233-234.
27. SEMEL, Y., J. NISSENBAU, N. MENDA, M. ZINDER, U. KRIEGER et al., 2006 Overdominant quantitative trait loci for yield and fitness in tomato. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103: 12981-12986.
28. STUBER, C. W., 1999 Biochemistry, molecular biology, and physiology of heterosis, pp. 173-183 in The Genetics and Exploitation of Heterosis in Crops, edited by J. G. Coors and S. Pandey. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI.
29. STUBER, C. W., S. E. LINCOLN, D.W. WOLFF, T.HELENTJARIS and E. S. LANDER, 1992 Identification of genetic factors contributing to heterosis in a hybrid from two elite maize inbred lines using molecular markers. Genetics 132: 823-839.
30. UTZ, H. F., 2003 PLABSTAT: a computer program for statistical analysis of plant breeding experiments. Institute of Plant Breeding, Seed Science and Population Genetics, University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany.
31. VOS, P., R. HOGERS, M. SLEEKER, M. REIJANS, T. LEE et al., 1995 AFLP: a new concept for DNA fingerprinting. Nucleic Acids Res. 23: 4407-4414.
32. WANG, D. L., J. ZHU, Z. K. L. LI and A. H. PATERSON, 1999 Mapping QTLs with epistatic effects and QTL x environment interactions by mixed linear model approaches. Theor. Appl. Genet. 99: 1255-1264.
33. XIAO, J., J. LI, L. YUAN and S. D. TANKSLEY, 1995 Dominance is the major genetic basis of heterosis in rice as revealed by QTL analysis using molecular markers. Genetics 140: 745-754.
34. YU, S. B., J. X. LI, C. G. XU, Y. F. TAN, Y. J. GAO et al., 1997 Importance of epistasis as the genetic basis of heterosis in an elite rice hybrid. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94: 9226-9231.
35. ZENG, Z. B., 1994 Precision mapping of quantitative trait loci. Genetics 136: 1457-1468.
36. ZHAO, J., H. C. BECKER, D. ZHANG, Y. ZHANG and W. ECKE, 2005 Oil content in a European x Chinese rapeseed population: QTL with additive and epistatic effects and their genotype-environment interactions. Crop Sci. 45: 51-59.