Behavioural Genetics: The Social Fly

Current Biology

Volumn 18, Issue 18, 2008, Pages

  Ritchie, Michael G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ST ANDREWS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; FLY; GENETICS; PHYSIOLOGY; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; SHORT SURVEY; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR;

ANIMALS; DIPTERA; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR;

EID: 52049119283     PISSN: 09609822     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2008.08.009     Document Type: Short Survey

References (17)

1. Barnard C. Animal Behaviour. Mechanism, Development, Function and Evolution (2004), Pearson Education Ltd, Harlow
2. Jallon J.-M. A few chemical words exchanged by Drosophila during courtship and mating. Behav. Genet. 14 (1984) 441-478
3. Coyne J.A., Crittenden A.P., and Mah K. Genetics of a pheromonal difference contributing to reproductive isolation in Drosophila. Science 265 (1994) 1461-1464
4. Demir E., and Dickson B.J. fruitless splicing specifies male courtship behavior in Drosophila. Cell 121 (2005) 785-794
5. Clyne J.D., and Miesenbock G. Sex-specific control and tuning of the pattern generator for courtship song in Drosophila. Cell 133 (2008) 354-363
6. Krupp J.J., Kent C., Billeter J.-C., Azanchi R., So A.K.-C., Lucas C., Smith B.P., Schonfeld J.A., and Levine J.D. Social experience modifies pheromone expression and mating behaviour in male Drosophila melanogaster. Curr. Biol. 18 (2008) 1373-1383
7. Kent C., Azanchi R., Smith B.P., Formosa A., and Levine J.D. Social context influences chemical communication in D. melanogaster males. Curr. Biol. 18 (2008) 1384-1389
8. Rosato E., and Kyriacou C.P. Flies, clocks and evolution. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. London B. 356 (2001) 1769-1778
9. Manning A. The effects of artificial selection for mating speed in Drosophila melanogaster. An. Behav. 9 (1961) 82-89
10. Moore A.J., Brodie III E.D., and Wolf J.B. Interacting phenotypes and the evolutionary process: I. direct and indirect genetic effects of social interactions. Evolution 51 (1997) 1352-1362
11. Moore A.J., Haynes K.F., Preziosi R.F., and Moore P.J. The evolution of interacting phenotypes: Genetics and evolution of social dominance. Am. Nat. 160 (2002) S186-S197
12. Costa R. Esterase-6 and the pheromonal effects of cis-vaccenyl acetate in Drosophila melanogaster. J. Evol. Biol. 2 (1989) 395-407
13. Kurtovic A., Widmer A., and Dickson B.J. A single class of olfactory neurons mediates behavioural responses to a Drosophila sex pheromone. Nature 446 (2007) 542-546
14. Wolf J.B., Brodie E.D., Cheverud J.M., Moore A.J., and Wade M.J. Evolutionary consequences of indirect genetic effects. Trends. Ecol. Evol. 13 (1998) 64-69
15. Petfield D., Chenoweth S.F., Rundle H.D., and Blows M.W. Genetic variance in female condition predicts indirect genetic variance in male sexual display traits. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 102 (2005) 6045-6050
16. Dukas R. Learning affects mate choice in female fruit flies. Behavioral Ecology 16 (2005) 800-804
17. Ejima A., Smith B.P.C., Lucas C., Van Naters W.V., Miller C.J., Carlson J.R., Levine J.D., and Griffith L.C. Generalization of courtship learning in Drosophila is mediated by cis-vaccenyl acetate. Curr. Biol. 17 (2007) 599-605