Comparability of GCSE examinations in different subjects: An application of the Rasch model

Oxford Review of Education

Volumn 34, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 609-636

  Coe, Robert ^a  

^a DURHAM UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 52049102613     PISSN: 03054985     EISSN: 14653915     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/03054980801970312     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Alton, A. & Pearson, S. (1996) Statistical Approaches to Inter-Subject Comparability. Unpublished UCLES research paper.
2. Baird, J., Cresswell, M. and Newton, P. (2000) Would the real gold standard please step forward? Research Papers in Education, 15(2), 213-229.
3. Baird, J. (2007) Alternative conceptions of comparability, in: P. Newton, J. Baird, H. Goldstein, H. Patrick and P. Tymms (Eds) Techniques for monitoring the comparability of examination standards (London, Qualifications and Curriculum Authority).
4. BBC (2000) Vocational GCSEs target disaffected, BBC News Online, 6 July. Available online at http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/education/821444.stm.
5. Coe, R. (2007) Common examinee methods for monitoring the comparability of examination standards, in: P. Newton, J. Baird, H. Goldstein, H. Patrick and P. Tymms (Eds) Techniques for monitoring the comparability of examination standards (London, Qualifications and Curriculum Authority).
6. Coe, R., Searle, J., Barmby, P., Jones, K. & Higgins, S. (2007) Relative difficulty of examinations in different subjects. Report for SCORE (Science Community Partnership Supporting Education) (Durham, Curriculum, Evaluation and Management Centre, Durham University).
7. Cresswell, M. J. (1996) Defining, setting and maintaining standards in curriculum-embedded examinations: judgemental and statistical approaches, in: H. Goldstein and T. Lewis (Eds) Assessment: problems, developments and statistical issues (Chichester, John Wiley & Sons).
8. Dearing, R. (1996) Review of qualifications for 16-19 year olds (London, School Curriculum and Assessment Authority).
9. Dunford, J. (2003) We do still have to address the issue of equal standards for all A-level subjects, Guardian Education, 26 August.
10. Fitz-Gibbon, C. T. & Vincent, L. (1994) Candidates' performance in public examinations in mathematics and science (London, SCAA).
11. Fitz-Gibbon, C. T. & Vincent, L. (1997) Difficulties regarding subject difficulties: developing reasonable explanations for observable data, Oxford Review of Education, 23(3), 291-298.
12. Goldstein, H. & Cresswell, M. (1996) The comparability of different subjects in public examinations: a theoretical and practical critique, Oxford Review of Education, 22(4), 435-442.
13. Jones, B. E. (2003) Subject pairs over time: a review of the evidence and the issues. Unpublished AQA research paper RC/220.
14. Karabatsos, G. (2000) A critique of Rasch residual fit statistics, Journal of Applied Measurement, 1 (2), 152-176.
15. Kelly, A. (1976) A study of the comparability of external examinations in different subjects, Research in Education, 16, 37-63.
16. Lamprianou, J. (2007) Commentary on Chapter 8, in: P. Newton, J. Baird, H. Goldstein, H. Patrick and P. Tymms (Eds) Techniques for monitoring the comparability of examination standards (London, Qualifications and Curriculum Authority).
17. Linacre, J. M. (2005a) WINSTEPS Rasch measurement computer program (Chicago, Winsteps.com).
18. Linacre, J. M. (2005b) A user's guide to WINSTEPS MINISTEP Rasch-model computer programs (Chicago, Winsteps.com).
19. LSC (Learning and Skills Council). (2006) Treatment of fails in the calculation of value added and distance travelled for the learner achievement tracker (18 July 2006). Available online at http://readingroom.lsc.gov.uk/ lsc/2006/quality/performanceachievement/ nattreatmentoffailsinthecalculationofvalueaddedanddistancetravelledmeasures-br- july2006.pdf (accessed 17 November 2006).
20. rd edn.) (New York, Macmillan).
21. Newton, P. E. (1997) Measuring comparability of standards between subjects: why our statistical techniques do not make the grade, British Educational Research Journal, 23(4), 433-449.
22. Newton, P. E. (2005) Examination standards and the limits of linking, Assessment in Education, 12(2), 105-123.
23. Newton, P., Baird, J., Goldstein, H., Patrick, H. & Tymms, P. (Eds) (2007) Techniques for monitoring the comparability of examination standards (London, Qualifications and Curriculum Authority).
24. Nuttall, D. L., Backhouse, J. K. & Willmott, A. S. (1974) Comparability of standards between subjects, Schools Council Examinations Bulletin, 29.
25. QCA (Qualifications and Curriculum Authority). (2004a) GCSE, GCSE in vocational subjects, GCE, VCE, GNVQ and AEA code of practice 2004/5. Available online at http://www.qca.org.uk/downloads/ 6295_gcse_vocgcse_gce_vce_gnvq_aea_code-of-practice_04-05.pdf (accessed 30 July 2006).
26. QCA (Qualifications and Curriculum Authority). (2004b) Including all approved qualifications in school and college performance indicators. Available online at http://www.qca.org.uk/14-19/devel-opments/index_including- all-approved.htm (accessed 20 February2007).
27. Rasch, G. (1960/1980) Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests (Copenhagen, Danish Institute for Educational Research). Expanded edition (1980) with foreword and afterword by B. D. Wright (Chicago, The University of Chicago Press).
28. Schagen, I. & Schagen, S. (2003) Analysis of national value-added datasets to assess the impact of selection on pupil performance, British Educational Research Journal, 29(4), 561-582.
29. Smith, R. M., Schumacker, R. E. & Bush, M. J. (1998) Using item mean squares to evaluate fit to the Rasch model, Journal of Outcome Measurment, 2(1), 66-78.
30. Sparkes, B. (2000) Subject comparisons - a Scottish perspective, Oxford Review of Education, 26(2), 175-189.
31. TISC (Tertiary Institutions Service Centre). (1998) Scaling (Perth, Curriculum Council, Government of Western Australia). Available online at http://www.curriculum.wa.edu.au/files/pdf/scaling.pdf (accessed 29 September 2006).
32. Tognolini, J. & Andrich, D. (1996) Analysis of profiles of students applying for entrance to universities, Applied Measurement in Education, 9(4), 323-353.
33. TQA (Tasmanian Qualifications Authority). (2000) Using Rasch analysis to scale TCE subjects. Available online at http://www.tqa.tas.gov.au/4DCGI/
34. TQA (Tasmanian Qualifications Authority). (2004) How the scaled awards are calculated and used to determine the tertiary entrance score. Available online at http://www.tqa.tas.gov.au/0477 (accessed 20 September 2007). 35 Willmott, A. (1995) A national study of subject grading standards at A-level, Summer 1993. A report commissioned by the Standing Research Advisory Committee for the GCE A-level examinations, Oxford.
35. Wright, B. D. (1997) Measurement for social science and education: history of social science measurement (Chicago, Institute for Objective Measurement). Available online at http://www.rasch.org/memo62.htm (accessed 4 September 2007).
36. Wright B. D. & Masters G. N. (1982) Rating scale analysis (Chicago, MESA Press).
37. Wright, B. D. & Stone, M. H. (1979) Best test design (Chicago, MESA Press).