Willingness to accept compensation for the environmental risks of oil transport on the Amazon: A choice modeling experiment

Ecological Economics

Volumn 67, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 552-559

  Casey, James F ^a   Kahn, James R ^a,b   Rivas, Alexandre A F ^a,b  

^a WASHINGTON AND LEE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF AMAZONAS   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Amazon River; Choice experiments; Ecosystem services; Non use value

Indexed keywords

ECONOMIC IMPACT; ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE; ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY; ENVIRONMENTAL RISK; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; MODELING; TRANSPORTATION SAFETY;

AMAZON RIVER; SOUTH AMERICA;

EID: 52049092532     PISSN: 09218009     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.01.006     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Attfield R., and Wilkins B. International Justice and the Third World: Studies in the Philosophy of Development (1992), Routledge, London and New York
2. Franceschi D., and Kahn J.R. Beyond strong sustainability. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology 10 (2003) 211-220
3. Grossman G.M., and Krueger A.B. Economic growth and the environment. Quarterly Journal of Economics 110 2 (1994) 353-377
4. Hanley N., Wright R.E., and Abramawicz V. Using choice experiments to value the environment. Environmental and Resource Economics 11 3-4 (1998) 413
5. Holmes T.P., and Adamowicz W.L. In: Champ P., Brown T., and Boyle K. (Eds). Attribute-based Methods. A Primer on Non-market Valuation (2003), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands
6. Li C.-Z., Kuuluvainen J., Pouta E., Rekola M., and Tahvonen O. Using choice experiments to value the Natura 2000 nature conservation programs in Finland. Environmental and Resource Economics 29 (2004) 361-374
7. Louviere J.J., Hensher D.A., and Swait J.D. Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and Applications (2000), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
8. Makhijani, Arjun. (1992). From Global Capitalism to Economic Justice: An Inquiry into the Elimination of Systemic Poverty, Violence and Environmental Destruction in the World Economy, New York and London: Council on International and Public Affairs, Apex Press.
9. Matthews K., Johnson F.R., Dunford R.W., and Desvousges W. The potential role of conjoint analysis in natural resource damage assessments. Triangle Economic Research working paper (1998)
10. McFadden D. Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. In: Zarembka P. (Ed). Frontiers in Econometrics (1974), Academic Press, New York
11. Pearce D.W., and Warford J.J. World Without End (1993), Oxford University Press for the World Bank., Washington, D.C.
12. Roe B., Boyle K.J., and Teisl M.F. Using conjoint analysis to derive estimates of compensating variation. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 31 2 (1996) 145-159
13. Rolfe J., Bennett J., and Louviere J. Choice modelling and its potential application to tropical rainforest preservation. Ecological Economics 35 (2000) 289-302
14. Shrestha R.K., and Alavalapati J.R.R. Valuing environmental benefits of silvopasture practice: a case study of the Lake Okeechobee watershed in Florida. Ecological Economics 49 (2004) 349-359
15. Stern D.I. The rise and fall of the environmental Kuznets curve. World Development 32 8 (2004) 1419-1439
16. Stevens T.H., Belkner R., Dennis D., Kittredge D., and Willis C. Comparison of contingent valuation and conjoint analysis for ecosystem management. Ecological Economics 32 1 (2000) 63-74
17. Stevens T.H., Barret C., and Willis C. Conjoint analysis of groundwater protection programs. Agriculture and Resource Economics Review (1997) 229-236 October
18. Stewart S., and Kahn J.R. An introduction to choice modeling for non-market valuation. In: Alberini A., and Kahn J.R. (Eds). Handbook of Contingent Valuation (2005), Edward Elgar Publishers, Cheltenham, UK
19. Stewart S., et al. Valuing biodiversity in a rural valley: Clinch and Powell watershed. In: Bruins R.J.F., and Heberling M.T. (Eds). Economics and Ecological Risk Assessment: Applications to Watershed Management (2005), CRC Press, New York 253-290
20. Swallow S.K., Opaluch J.J., and Weaver T.F. Siting noxious facilities: an approach that integrates technical, economic, and political considerations. Land Economics 68 n3 (1992) 283-301 (August)