A three-point minimal solution for panoramic stitching with lens distortion

26th IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, CVPR

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages

  Jin, Hailin ^a  

^a ADOBE RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; CAMERAS; COMPUTER VISION; FEATURE EXTRACTION; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE PROCESSING; LENSES; PATTERN RECOGNITION; WELL TESTING;

FOCAL LENGTHS; HYPOTHESIS TESTING; LENS DISTORTIONS; MINIMAL SOLUTIONS; NUMERICAL INSTABILITIES; PANORAMIC STITCHING; POINT CORRESPONDENCES; REAL IMAGES;

OPTICAL INSTRUMENTS;

EID: 51949118162     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/CVPR.2008.4587686     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (27)

1. A. Agarwala. Efficient gradient-domain compositing using quadtrees. In Proc. of ACM SIGGRAPH, 2007.
2. J. P. Barreto and K. Daniilidis. Fundamental matrix for cameras with radial distortion. In Proc. of Intl. Conf. on Computer Vision, 2005.
3. M. Brown, R. I. Hartley, and D. Nister. Minimal solutions for panoramic stitching. In Proc. of IEEE Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2007.
4. M. Brown and D. G. Lowe. Automatic panoramic image stitching using invariant features. Int. J. of Computer Vision, 74(1):59-73, 2006.
5. M. Byröd, K. Josephson, and K. Åström. Improving numerical accuracy of gröbner basis polynomial equation solvers. In Proc. of Intl. Conf. on Computer Vision, 2007.
6. M A. Fischler and R. C. Bolles. Random sample consensus: a paradigm for model fitting with applications to image analysis and automated cartography. Communications of the ACM, 24(6):381-395, June 1981.
7. A.W. Fitzgibbon. Simultaneous linear estimation of multiple view geometry and lens distortion. In Proc. of IEEE Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2001.
8. C. Geyer and H. Stewénius. A nine-point algorithm for estimating para-catadioptric fundamental matrices. In Proc. of IEEE Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2007.
9. D. R. Grayson and M. E. Stillman. Macaulay 2, a software system for research in algebraic geometry. Available at http://www.math.uiuc.edu/Macaulay2.
10. R. Hartley and A. Zisserman. Multiple view geometry in computer vision. Cambridge University Press, 2000.
11. Z. Kukelova and T. Pajdla. A minimal solution to the autocalibration of radial distortion. In Proc. of IEEE Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2007.
12. Z. Kukelova and T. Pajdla. Two minimal problems for cameras with radial distortion. In Proc. of Seventh Workshop on Omnidirectional Vision, Camera Networks and Nonclassical Cameras, 2007.
13. H. Li and R. Hartley. A non-iterative method for correcting lens distortion from nine point correspondences. In Proc. of Workshop on Omnidirectional Vision, Camera Networks and Non-classical cameras, 2005.
14. H. Li and R. Hartley. Five-point motion estimation made easy. In Proc. of Intl. Con. on Pattern Recognition, volume 1, pages 630-633, 2006.
15. D. G. Lowe. Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints. Int. J. of Computer Vision, 60(2):91-110, November 2004.
16. B. Micusik and T. Pajdla. Estimation of omnidirectional camera model from epipolar geometry. In Proc. of IEEE Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, volume 1, pages 485-490, June 2003.
17. J. J. Moré. The Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm: Implementation and theory. Lecture Notes in Mathematics. Springer Berlin / Heidelberg, 1978.
18. D. Nister. An efficient solution to the five-point relative pose problem. IEEE Trans. on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 26(6):756-777, June 2004.
19. H. S. Sawhney and R. Kumar. True multi-image alignment and its application to mosaicing and lens distortion correction. IEEE Trans. on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 21(3):235-243, March 1999.
20. R. M. Steele and C. Jaynes. Overconstrained linear estimation of radial distortion and multi-view geometry. In Proc. of Europ. Conf. on Computer Vision, pages 253-264, 2006.
21. H. Stewénius. Gröbner Basis Methods for Minimal Problems in Computer Vision. PhD thesis, Lund University, April 2005.
22. H. Stewénius, F. Kahl, D. Nister, and F. Schaffalitzky. A minimal solution for relative pose with unknown focal length. In Proc. of IEEE Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 789-794, June 2005.
23. H. Stewénius, F. Schaffalitzky, and D. Nister. How hard is 3-view triangulation really? In Proc. of Intl. Conf. on Computer Vision, 2005.
24. R. Szeliski. Image alignment and stitching: A tutorial. Foundations and Trends in Computer Graphics and Vision, 2(1), 2006.
25. B. Triggs, P. F. McLauchlan, R. I. Hartley, and A.W. Fitzgibbon. Bundle adjustment - a modern synthesis. In Proc. Intl. Workshop on Vision Algorithms: Theory and Practice, pages 298-372, 1999.
26. R. Y. Tsai. Versatile camera calibration technique for high accuracy 3d machine vision metrology using off-the-shelf tv cameras and lenses. IEEE Trans. of Robotics and Automation, 3(4):323-344, August 1987.
27. Z. Zhang. A flexible new technique for camera calibration. IEEE Trans. on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 22(11):1330-1334, November 2000.