Enhanced biologically inspired model

26th IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, CVPR

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages

  Huang, Yongzhen ^a   Huang, Kaiqi ^a   Wang, Liangsheng ^a   Tao, Dacheng ^b   Tan, Tieniu ^a   Li, Xuelong ^c  

^a INSTITUTE OF AUTOMATION   (China)

^b HONG KONG POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY   (Hong Kong)

^c UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; COMPUTER VISION; FEATURE EXTRACTION; IMAGE PROCESSING; OBJECT RECOGNITION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; SENSOR NETWORKS;

BIOLOGICALLY INSPIRED MODELS; COMPUTATIONAL COSTS; EMPIRICAL STUDIES; FEATURE SELECTION; FEED-FORWARD; FRAMES PER SECOND; SPARSITY CONSTRAINTS; STATE-OF-THE-ART METHODS; VISUAL CORTICES;

DATABASE SYSTEMS;

EID: 51949110595     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/CVPR.2008.4587599     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (36)

1. http://www.robots.ox.ac.uk/vgg/data3.html.
2. http://cbcl.mit.edu/software-datasets/index.html.
3. http://cbcl.mit.edu/software-datasets/streetscenes.
4. S. Belongie, J. Malik, and J. Puzicha. Shape matching and object recognition using shape contexts. IEEE Trans. on PAMI, 24(4):509-522, 2002.
5. A. Berg, T. Berg, and J. Malik. Shape matching and object recognition using low distortion correspondence. CVPR, 2005.
6. P. Berkes and L. Wiskott. Slow feature analysis yields a rich repertoire of complex cell properties. Journal of Vision, 5:579-602, 2005.
7. S. Bileschi and L. Wolf. Image representations beyond histograms of gradients: The role of gestalt descriptors. CVPR, 2007.
8. C. C. Chang and C. J. Lin. LIBSVM: a library for support vector machines, 2001. Software available at http://www.csie.ntu.edu.tw/cjlin/libsvm.
9. Y. Chen and J. Z. Wang. A region-based fuzzy feature matching approach to content-based image retrieval. IEEE Trans. on PAMI, 24(9):1252-1267, 2002.
10. N. Cristianini and J. Shawe-Taylor. Support vector machines and other kernel-based learning methods. cambridge, 2000. U.K.: Cambridge Univ. Press.
11. G. Csurka, C. Bray, C. Dance, and L. Fan. Visual categorization with bags of keypoints. ECCV, 2004.
12. N. Dalal and B. Triggs. Histograms of oriented gradients for human detection. CVPR, 2005.
13. L. Fei-Fei, R. Fergus, and P. Perona. Learning generative visual models from few training examples: an incremental bayesian approach tested on 101 object categories. CVPR, 2004.
14. K. Grauman and T. Darrell. Pyramid match kernels: Discriminative classification with sets of image features, 2006. Technical Report MIT-CSAIL-TR-2006-020.
15. T. Hastie and R. Tibshirani. Classification by pairwise coupling. The annals of statistics, 26(2):451-471, 1998.
16. S. Hochstein and M. Ahissar. View from the top: Hierarchies and reverse hierarchies in the visual system. J. Neuron, 36(5):791-804, 2002.
17. A. Holub, M. Welling, and P. Perona. Exploiting unlabelled data for hybrid object classification. Proc. Neural Information Processing Systems, Workshop Inter-Class Transfer, 2005.
18. A. Hyvarinen and P. O. Hoyer. A two-layer sparse coding model learns simple and complex cell receptive fields and topography from natural images. Vision Research, 41(18):2413-2423, 2001.
19. S. Lazebnik, C. Schmid, and J. Ponce. A sparse texture representation using local affine regions, 2004. Technical Report, Beckman Institute, University of Illinois.
20. T. Leung and J. Malik. Representing and recognizing the visual appearance of materials using three-dimensional textons. International Journal of Computer Vision, 43(1):29-44, 2001.
21. D. G. Lowe. Distinctive image features from dcale-invariant key-points. International Journal of Computer Vision, 2(60):91-110, 2004.
22. K. Mikolajczyk and C. Schmid. A performance evaluation of local descriptors. IEEE Trans. on PAMI, 27(10):1615-1630, 2005.
23. P. Moreno and L. Wiskott. Slow feature analysis yields a rich repertoire of complex cell properties. Journal of Vision, 5:579-602, 2005.
24. G. Murphy and D. Medin. The role of theories in conceptual coherence. Psychological Review, 92:289-316, 1985.
25. J. Mutch and D. G. Lowe. Multiclass object recognition with sparse, localized features. CVPR, 2006.
26. W. Niblack, R. Barber, W. Equitz, M. Fickner, E. Glasman, D. Petkovic, and P. Yanker. The QBIC project: Querying images by content using color, texture and shape. Proc. Storage and Retrieval for Image and Video Databases,SPIE, 1993.
27. Y. Rui, T. S. Huang, and S. Mehrotra. Content-Based image retrieval with relevance feedback in MARS. IEEE Intl. Conf. on Image Processing, 1997.
28. K. Sakai and S. Tanaka. Spatial pooling in the second-order spatial structure of cortical complex cells. Vision Research, 40:855-871, 2000.
29. B. Schiele and J. Crowley. Recognition without correspondence using multidimensional receptive field histograms. International Journal of Computer Vision, 36(1):31-35, 2000.
30. T. Serre, L. Wolf, S. Bileschi, M. Riesenhuber, and T. Poggio. Robust object recognition with cortex-like mechanisms. IEEE Trans. on PAMI, 29(6), 1993.
31. T. Serre, L. Wolf, and T. Poggio. Object recognition with features inspired by visual cortex. CVPR, 2005.
32. V. N. Vapnik. Statistical learning theory, 1998. New York: John Wiley.
33. P. Viola and M. Jones. Rapid object detection using a boosted cascade of simple features. CVPR, 2001.
34. P. Viola and M. Jones. Robust real-time object detection. Proc. Of IEEE Workshop on Statistical and Computa-tional Theories of Vision, 2001.
35. J. Z. Wang, G. Wiederhold, O. Firschein, and S. X. Wei. Content based image indexing and searching using daubechies wavelets. J. Digital Libraries, 1(4):311-328, 1998.
36. L. Wolf, S. Bileschi, and E. Meyers. Perception strategies in hierarchical vision systems. CVPR, 2006.