Population differences in condition-dependent sexual selection may promote divergence in non-sexual traits

Evolutionary Ecology Research

Volumn 10, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 763-773

  Pfennig, Karin S ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

Fitness trade offs; Mate choice; Mate quality recognition; Reproductive character displacement; Sexual selection; Speciation; Species recognition

Indexed keywords

ANURA; PELOBATIDAE; SPEA MULTIPLICATA;

EID: 51949106626     PISSN: 15220613     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Altwegg, R. and Reyer, H.U. 2003. Patterns of natural selection on size at metamorphosis in water frogs. Evolution, 57: 872-882.
2. Andersson, M. 1994. Sexual Selection. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
3. Bevier, C.R. 1997. Utilization of energy substrates during calling activity in tropical frogs. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 41: 343-352.
4. Candolin, U. 2003. The use of multiple cues in mate choice. Biol. Rev., 78: 575-595.
5. Cherry, M.I. 1993. Sexual selection in the raucous toad, Bufo rangeri. Anim. Behav., 45: 359-373.
6. Coyne, J.A. and Orr, H.A. 2004. Speciation. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
7. Dobzhansky, T. 1940. Speciation as a stage in evolutionary divergence. Am. Nat., 74: 312-321.
8. Forester, D.C. 1973. Mating call as a reproductive isolating mechanism between Scaphiopus bombifrons and S. hammondii. Copeia, 1973: 60-67.
9. Forester, D.C. 1975. Laboratory evidence for potential gene flow between two species of spadefoot toads, Scaphiopus bombifrons and Scaphiopus hammondii. Herpetologica, 31: 282-286.
10. Gerhardt, H.C. 1982. Sound pattern-recognition in some North American treefrogs (Anura, Hylidae) - implications for mate choice. Am. Zool., 22: 581-595.
11. Gerhardt, H.C. 1991. Female mate choice in treefrogs - static and dynamic acoustic criteria. Anim. Behav., 42: 615-635.
12. Gerhardt, H.C. 1994. Reproductive character displacement of female mate choice in the gray treefrog, Hyla chrysoscelis. Anim. Behav., 47: 959-969.
13. Grafe, T.U. 1996. Energetics of vocalization in the African reed frog (Hyperolius marmoratus). Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A, 114: 235-243.
14. Grafen, A. 1990. Sexual selection unhandicapped by the Fisher process. J. Theor. Biol., 144: 473-516.
15. Gumm, J.M., Gonzalez, R., Aspbury, A.S. and Gabor, C.R. 2006. Do I know you? Species recognition operates within and between the sexes in a unisexual-bisexual species complex of mollies. Ethology, 112: 448-457.
16. Hankison, S.J. and Morris, M.R. 2003. Avoiding a compromise between sexual selection and species recognition: female swordtail fish assess multiple species-specific cues. Behav. Ecol., 14: 282-287.
17. Hebets, E.A. and Papaj, D.R. 2005. Complex signal function: developing a framework of testable hypotheses. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 57: 197-214.
18. Hoskin, C.J., Higgie, M., McDonald, K.R. and Moritz, C. 2005. Reinforcement drives rapid allopatric speciation. Nature, 437: 1353-1356.
19. Howard, D.J. 1993. Reinforcement: origin, dynamics, and fate of an evolutionary hypothesis. In Hybrid Zones and the Evolutionary Process (R.G. Harrison, ed.), pp. 46-69. New York: Oxford University Press.
20. Kirkpatrick, M. 1982. Sexual selection and the evolution of female choice. Evolution, 36: 1-12.
21. Kirkpatrick, M. and Ryan, M.J. 1991. The evolution of mating preferences and the paradox of the lek. Nature, 350: 33-38.
22. Lande, R. 1980. Sexual dimorphism, sexual selection, and adaptation in polygenic characters. Evolution, 34: 292-305.
23. Lorch, P.D., Proulx, S., Rowe, L. and Day, T. 2003. Condition-dependent sexual selection can accelerate adaptation. Evol. Ecol. Res., 5: 867-881.
24. Pfennig, D.W., Mabry, A. and Orange, D. 1991. Environmental causes of correlations between age and size at metamorphosis in Scaphiopus multiplicatus. Ecology, 72: 2240-2248.
25. Pfennig, D.W., Rice, A.M. and Martin, R.A. 2006. Ecological opportunity and phenotypic plasticity interact to promote character displacement and species coexistence. Ecology, 87: 769-779.
26. Pfennig, K.S. 1998. The evolution of mate choice and the potential for conflict between species and mate-quality recognition. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 265: 1743-1748.
27. Pfennig, K.S. 2000. Female spadefoot toads compromise on mate quality to ensure conspecific matings. Behav. Ecol., 11: 220-227.
28. Pfennig, K.S. and Pfennig, D.W. 2005. Character displacement as the 'best of a bad situation': fitness trade-offs resulting from selection to minimize resource and mate competition. Evolution, 59: 2200-2208.
29. Pfennig, K.S. and Ryan, M.J. 2006. Reproductive character displacement generates reproductive isolation among conspecific populations: an artificial neural network study. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B, 273: 1361-1368.
30. Pfennig, K.S. and Simovich, M.A. 2002. Differential selection to avoid hybridization in two toad species. Evolution, 56: 1840-1848.
31. Prestwich, K.N., Brugger, K.E. and Topping, M. 1989. Energy and communication in 3 species of hylid frogs - power input, power output and efficiency. J. Exp. Biol., 144: 53-80.
32. Rosenthal, G.G., Wagner, W.E. and Ryan, M.J. 2002. Secondary reduction of preference for the sword ornament in the pygmy swordtail Xiphophorus nigrensis (Pisces: Poeciliidae). Anim. Behav., 63: 37-45.
33. Rowe, L. and Houle, D. 1996. The lek paradox and the capture of genetic variance by condition dependent traits. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B, 263: 1415-1421.
34. Ryan, M.J. and Rand, A.S. 1993. Species recognition and sexual selection as a unitary problem in animal communication. Evolution, 47: 647-657.
35. Servedio, M.R. and Noor, M.A.F. 2003. The role of reinforcement in speciation: theory and data. Annu. Rev. Evol. Ecol. Syst., 34: 339-364.
36. Shaw, K.L. and Herlihy, D. 2000. Acoustic preference functions and song variability in the Hawaiian cricket Laupala cerasina. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B, 267: 577-584.
37. Simovich, M.A. 1985. Analysis of a hybrid zone between the spadefoot toads Scaphiopus multiplicatus and Scaphiopus bombifrons. PhD thesis, University of California.
38. Simovich, M.A., Sassaman, C.A. and Chovnick, A. 1991. Post-mating selection of hybrid toads (Scaphiopus multiplicatus and Scaphiopus bombifrons). Proc. San Diego Soc. Nat. Hist., 1991: 1-6.
39. Taigen, T.L. and Wells, K.D. 1985. Energetics of vocalization by an anuran amphibian (Hyla versicolor). J. Comp. Physiol. B: Biochem. Syst. Environ. Physiol., 155: 163-170.
40. Tanaka, Y. 1996. Sexual selection enhances population extinction in a changing environment. J. Theor. Biol., 180: 197-206.
41. Tomkins, J.L., Radwan, J., Kotiaho, J.S. and Tregenza, T. 2004. Genic capture and resolving the lek paradox. Trends Ecol. Evol., 19: 323-328.
42. Webb, C. 2003. A complete classification of Darwinian extinction in ecological interactions. Am. Nat., 161: 181-205.