A framework for evaluating the economic performance of recycling systems: A case study of North American electronics recycling systems

Environmental Science and Technology

Volumn 42, Issue 18, 2008, Pages 6800-6808

  Gregory, Jeremy R ^a,c   Kirchain, Randolph E ^a,b  

^a MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b USA   (United States)

^c NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATA PROCESSING; DATA STORAGE EQUIPMENT; FINANCE; MANUFACTURE;

ALBERTA; CALIFORNIA; CASE STUDIES; CASH FLOWS; DATA COLLECTIONS; DESCRIPTORS; ECONOMIC PERFORMANCES; ELECTRONICS RECYCLING; MANAGEMENT COSTS; NORTH AMERICA; PROCESSING COSTS; RECYCLING SYSTEMS; SYSTEM COMPONENTS; SYSTEM MANAGEMENT;

RECYCLING;

COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; ECONOMIC IMPACT; MODELING; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; RECYCLING;

ARTICLE; CANADA; CONSUMER; COST; ECONOMIC EVALUATION; ELECTRONIC WASTE; ELECTRONICS; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; INDUSTRIAL WASTE; LANDFILL; NORTH AMERICA; RECYCLING; SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT; UNITED STATES;

ALBERTA; CALIFORNIA; CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; ELECTRONICS; EVALUATION STUDIES AS TOPIC; MAINE; NORTH AMERICA; REFUSE DISPOSAL;

ALBERTA; CALIFORNIA; CANADA; MAINE; MARYLAND; NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 51949103569     PISSN: 0013936X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/es702666v     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Griff, A. L. Is recycling good for the environment? In Society of Plastics Engineers Global Plastics Environmental Conference, Detroit, MI, 2003.
2. Waste & Resources Action Programme. Environmental Benefits of Recycling: An International Review of Life Cycle Comparisons for Key Materials in the UK Recycling Sector, 2006.
3. Hendrickson, C.; Lave, L.; McMichael, F. Reconsider recycling. Chemtech 1995, 25 (8), 56-60.
4. Lave, L. B.; Hendrickson, C. T.; Conway-Schempf, N. M.; McMichael, F. C. Municipal solid waste recycling issues. J. Environ. Eng. 1999, 125 (10), 944-949.
5. Dunlap, R. E. The State of Environmentalism in the U.S.; available at http://www.galluppoll.com/content/?ci=27256 (accessed August 9, 2007).
6. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Municipal Solid Waste in the United States: 2005 Facts and Figures; U.S. EPA: Washington, DC, 2005.
7. Gunter, M. Do economists reach a conclusion on household and municipal recycling? Econ. J. Watch 2007, 4 (1), 83-111.
8. Ackerman, F. Why Do We Recycle?; Island Press: Washington, DC, 1997.
9. The Truth about Recycling. Economist June 7, 2007; pp 22-26.
10. Porter, R. C. The Economics of Waste; Resources for the Future: Washington, DC, 2002.
11. Craighill, A. L.; Powell, J. C. Lifecycle assessment and economic evaluation of recycling: A case study. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 1996, 17 (2), 75-96.
12. Callan, S. J.; Thomas, J. M. The impact of state and local policies on the recycling effort. Eastern Econ. J. 1997, 23 (4), 411-423.
13. Hong, S.; Adams, R. M.; Love, H. A. An economic analysis of household recycling of solid wastes: The case of Portland, Oregon. J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 1993, 25 (2), 136-146.
14. Fullerton, D. ; Kinnaman, T. C. The Economics of Household Garbage and Recycling Behavior; Edward Elgar: Northampton, MA, 2002.
15. Kinnaman, T. C. Policy watch - examining the justification for residential recycling. J. Econ. Perspect. 2006, 20 (4), 219-232.
16. Pearce, D. Does European Union environmental policy pass a cost - benefit test? World Econ. 2004, 5 (3), 115-137.
17. Dantec, D. Analysis of the cost of recycling compliance for the automobile industry. Master's Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2005.
18. Ferrão, P.; Amaral, J. Assessing the economics of auto recycling activities in relation to European Union directive on end of life vehicles. Technol. Forecast. Social Change 2006, 73 (3), 277-289.
19. Field, F. R., III; Ehrenfeld, J. R.; Roos, D.; Clark, J. P. Automobile Recycling Policy: Findings and Recommendations; International Motor Vehicle Program: Philadelphia, PA, 1994.
20. Caudill, R.; Jackson, S. ; Rifer, W. ; Marella, F.; Cole, S.; Willmott, A. Assessing base level of service for electronics collection and recycling programs: Seattle-Tacoma case study. In 2003 IEEE International Symposium on Electronics and the Environment, May 19-22, 2003; Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers: Boston, MA, 2003; pp 309-314.
21. Lu, Q.; Stuart, J. A. An investigation of bulk recycling planning for an electronics recycling facility receiving industrial returns versus residential returns. IEEE Trans. Electron. Packag. Manufact. 2003, 26 (4), 320-327.
22. Kang, H. Y.; Schoenung, J. M. Economic analysis of electronic waste recycling: Modeling the cost and revenue of a materials recovery facility in California. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2006, 40 (5), 1672-1680.
23. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Final Report on the Mid-Atlantic States'Electronics Recycling Pilot, U.S. EPA: Washington, DC, 2004.
24. Product Stewardship Institute. The collection and recycling of used computers using a reverse distribution system: A pilot project with Staples, Inc; available at http://www.productstewardship.us/associations/6596/files/ Staples_final_rep.doc; accessed May 2007.
25. Macauley, M.; Palmer, K.; Shih, J. S. Dealing with electronic waste: Modeling the costs and environmental benefits of computer monitor disposal. J. Environ. Manage. 2003, 68 (1), 13-22.
26. National Center for Electronics Recycling. A Study of the State-by-State e-Waste Patchwork; National Center for Electronics Recycling, October 2006.
27. Smith, S. Analytical Framework for Evaluating the Costs and Benefits of Extended Producer Responsibility Programmes; Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development: Paris, France, 2005.
28. Bohr, P. The economics of electronics recycling: New approaches to extended producer responsibility. PhD Thesis, Technical University Berlin, 2007.
29. Huisman, J.; Magalini, F. ; Kuehr, R.; Maurer, C.; Ogilvie, S.; Poll, J.; Delgado, C. ; Artim, E. ; Szlezak, J. ; Stevels, A. 2008 Review of Directive 2002/96 on Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE): Final Report; United Nations University: Bonn, Germany, 2007.
30. Magalini, F.; Huisman, J. Management of WEEE and cost models across the EU: Could the EPR principle lead us to a better environmental policy? In 2007 IEEE International Symposium on Electronics and the Environment, Orlando, FL; Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.: Piscataway, NJ, 2007; pp 143-148.
31. Sander, K.; Schilling, S.; Tojo, N.; Rossem, C. v.; Vernon, J.; George, C. The Producer Responsibility Principle of the WEEE Directive, Okopol Institute for Environmental Strategies: Hamburg, Germany, 2007.
32. Stole, L. P. State legislation in electronics product stewardship. In E-Scrap: North American Electronics Recycling Conference Proceedings, Austin, TX, October 18-19, 2006.
33. Northwest Product Stewardship Council. Front-end financing (FEF) scenarios for collection/recycling of electronic products; available at http://www.productstewardship.net/PDFs/productsElectronicsFinancingScenarios. pdf; accessed May 2007.
34. Province of Alberta. Order in council 212: Designated material recycling and management regulation. In Environmental Protection and Enhancement Act - Section 175: Alberta, CA, 2004.
35. Province of Alberta. Order in council 213: Electronics designation regulation. In Environmental Protection and Enhancement Act - Section 175: Alberta, CA, 2004;
36. Alberta Recycling Management Authority. 2005-2006 Annual Report; 2006.
37. Alberta Recycling Management Authority. Alberta's Electronic Recycling Program; available at http://www.albertarecycling.ca/public/data/documents/ ElectronicsFactsAugust2005PDF.PDF; accessed September 1, 2006.
38. Alberta Recycling Management Authority. Quick Facts & Stats: Electronics Recycling; available at http://www.albertarecycling.ca/ BasicContent.aspx?id=66; accessed February 19, 2007.
39. Wright, D. Alberta Recycling Management Authority, Personal Communication, September 11, 2006.
40. State of California. Senate Bill 20: Electronic Waste Recycling Act of 2003. In California Statutes; Sacramento, California, 2003.
41. National Center for Electronics Recycling. NCER meeting with Shirley Willd-Wagner, Jeff Hunts, California Integrated Waste Management Board; Richard Parrott and Jim Van Gundy, Board of Equalization; August 3-4, 2006.
42. National Electronics Recycling Infrastructure Clearinghouse. State Electronics Recycling Law Implementation Status; available at http://www.ecyclingresource.org/ContentPage.aspx? PageId=23; accessed May 8, 2007.
43. California Integrated Waste Management Board. California Electronic Waste Recycling Act: Analysis of 2005 Net Cost Reports; Sacramento, CA, 2007.
44. State of Maine. Title 38, section 1610. Electronic Waste; Maine Revised Statutes Annotated, 2005.
45. Cifrino, C. Maine Department of Environmental Protection. Personal communication April 27, 2007.
46. State of Maryland. Title 9, subtitle 17, part IV. Statewide Computer Recycling Pilot Program; Article - Environment, 2005.
47. Miller, H. Recycling and Operations Program, Maryland Department of the Environment. Personal communication April 26, 2007.
48. Fredholm, S. ; Gregory, J.; Kirchain, R. Characterizing architectural options for electronic waste recycling systems. In Proceedings of the 2008 IEEE International Symposium on Electronics and the Environment, San Francisco, CA, 2008.
49. Rifer, W. Survey of collectors and processors. In E-Scrap: North American Electronics Recycling Conference, Orlando, FL, October 27-28, 2005.
50. Nixon, H.; Saphores, J.-D. M. Financing electronic waste recycling Californian households' willingness to pay advanced recycling fees. J. Environ. Manage. 2007, 84 (4), 547-559.