Financing electronic waste recycling Californian households' willingness to pay advanced recycling fees

Journal of Environmental Management

Volumn 84, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 547-559

  Nixon, Hilary ^a   Saphores, Jean Daniel M ^b  

^a SAN JOSE STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b University of California at Irvine   (United States)

Author keywords

Electronic waste; Ordered logit; Principal components analysis; Recycling financing

Indexed keywords

ECONOMIC ANALYSIS; ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; RECYCLING; WASTES;

CALIFORNIA; ELECTRONIC WASTE RECYCLING; ELECTRONICS WASTES; MAIL SURVEYS; ORDERED LOGIT; PRINCIPAL-COMPONENT ANALYSIS; RECYCLING FEE; RECYCLING FINANCING; RECYCLING RATE; WILLINGNESS TO PAY;

ELECTRONIC WASTE;

ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT; HOUSEHOLD SURVEY; RECYCLING; SOLID WASTE; WASTE MANAGEMENT; WILLINGNESS TO PAY;

ADULT; AGE; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOMESTIC WASTE; EDUCATION; ELECTRONICS; FUNDING; GOVERNMENT; HUMAN; INCOME; POLICY; POPULATION DENSITY; POSTAL MAIL; RECYCLING; UNITED STATES; WASTE MANAGEMENT;

CALIFORNIA; NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 33845792826     PISSN: 03014797     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.07.003     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Ajzen I. From intentions to actions: a theory of planned behavior. In: Kuhl J., and Beckman J. (Eds). Action-Control: From Cognition to Behavior (1985), Springer, New York 11-39
2. Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50 (1991) 179-211
3. Alreck P.L., and Settle R.B. The Survey Research Handbook. Second ed (1995), Irwin McGraw-Hill, Boston, MA
4. Andreoni J. Impure altruism and donations to public goods: a theory of warm-glow giving. The Economic Journal 100 (1990) 464-477
5. Basel Action Network and Silicon Valley Toxics Coalition, 2002. Exporting Harm: The High-tech Trashing of Asia. Seattle, WA; San Jose, CA.
6. Blaine T.W., Lichtkoppler F.R., Jones K.R., and Zondag R.H. An assessment of household willingness to pay for curbside recycling; a comparison of payment care and referendum approaches. Journal of Environmental Management 76 1 (2005) 15-22
7. Bohm P. Estimating demand for public goods: An experiment. European Economics Review 3 (1972) 111-130
8. Brant R. Assessing proportionality in the proportional odds model for ordinal logistic regression. Biometrics 46 (1990) 1171-1178
9. Brook R.K., and McLachlan S.M. Factors influencing farmers' concerns regarding bovine tuberculosis in wildlife and livestock around Riding Mountain National Park. Journal of Environmental Management 80 2 (2006) 156-166
10. Brown C. Consumers' preferences for locally produced food: a study in southeast Missouri. American Journal of Alternative Agriculture 18 (2003) 213-224
11. Caplan A.J., Grijalva T.C., and Jakus P.M. Waste not or want not? A contingent ranking analysis of curbside waste disposal options. Ecological Economics 43 (2002) 185-197
12. Cascadia Consulting Group, 2005. Will they cover costs over time? An assessment of the advanced recovery fees needed to sustain recycling of covered electronics products under ESHB 2488. Draft Report, Washington.
13. Chan K. Mass communication and pro-environmental behavior: waste recycling in Hong Kong. Journal of Environmental Management 52 4 (1998) 317-325
14. Charnley S., and Engelbert B. Evaluating public participation in environmental decision-making: EPA's superfund community involvement program. Journal of Environmental Management 77 3 (2005) 165-182
15. Chung S.-S., and Poon C.-S. The attitudinal differences in source separation and waste reduction between the general public and housewives in Hong Kong. Journal of Environmental Management 48 3 (1996) 215-227
16. Chung S.-S., and Poon C.-S. A comparison of waste-reduction practices and new environmental paradigm of rural and urban Chinese citizens. Journal of Environmental Management 62 (2001) 3-19
17. CIWMB. Statewide Waste Characterization Study (Publication #340-04-005) (2004), California Integrated Waste Management Board, Sacramento, CA
18. CIWMB, 2006. Electronic product management news. Sacramento, CA: California Integrated Waste Management Board. Accessed June 22, 2006 from http://www.ciwmb.ca.gov/electronics/News/
19. Clark C.F., Kotchen M.J., and Moore M.R. Internal and external influences on pro-environmental behavior: participation in a green electricity program. Journal of Environmental Psychology 23 (2003) 237-246
20. Cornes R., and Sandler T. Easy riders, joint production, and public goods. The Economic Journal 94 375 (1984) 580-598
21. Council of State Governments, 2006. Northeast Regional Electronics Management Project. Eastern Regional Conference. New York, NY. Available from 〈http://www.csgeast.org/enrgwaste.asp〉 01/26/06.
22. Darby L., and Obara L. Household recycling behaviour and attitudes towards the disposal of small electrical and electronic equipment. Resources Conservation and Recycling 44 (2005) 17-35
23. De Pelsmacker P., Driesen L., and Rayp G. Do consumers case about ethics? Willingness to pay for fair-trade coffee. The Journal of Consumer Affairs 39 (2005) 363-385
24. Dillon, P.S., 1994. Mandated electronic equipment recycling in Europe: implications for companies and US public policy. Working Paper. Tufts University.
25. Dunlap R.E., and Van Liere K.D. The "New Environmental Paradigm". Journal of Environmental Education 9 4 (1978) 10-19
26. Ebreo A., Hershey J., and Vining J. Reducing solid waste: linking recycling to environmentally responsible consumerism. Environment and Behavior 31 10 (1999) 107-135
27. EPA. Municipal Solid Waste in the United States: 2003 Facts and Figures EPA-530-F-05-003 (2005), Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, Washington, DC
28. Folz D.H. Municipal recycling performance: a public sector environmental success story. Public Administration Review 59 4 (1999) 336-345
29. Fowler Jr. F.J. Survey Research Methods. Second ed (1993), Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA
30. Fransson N., and Garling T. Environmental concern: conceptual definitions, measurement methods, and research findings. Journal of Environmental Psychology 19 (1999) 369-382
31. GAO [General Accounting Office], 2005. Electronic waste: Strengthening the role of the federal government in encouraging recycling and reuse. Report to Congressional Requesters, Washington, D.C.
32. Guagnano G., Stern P.C., and Dietz T. Influences on attitude-behavior relationships: a natural experiment with curbside recycling. Environment and Behavior 27 (1995) 699-718
33. Harris R., Burress D., and Eicher S. Demands for Local and Organic Produce: A Brief Review of the Literature (2000), Institute for Public Policy and Business Research, University of Kansas
34. Hosmer D.W., and Lemeshow S. Applied Logistic Regression. Second ed (2000), Wiley, New York
35. Huisman, J., Stevels, A., Marinelli, T., Magalini, F., 2006. Where did WEEE go wrong in Europe? Practical and academic lessons for the US. In: Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE International Symposium on Electronics and the Environment, ISBN:1-4244-0351-0, San Francisco (May).
36. IAER [International Association of Electronics Recyclers]. IAER Electronics Recycling Industry Report (2006), Resources Recycling, Portland, OR
37. Jordi H. A financing system for battery recycling in Switzerland. Journal of Power Sources 57 (1995) 51-53
38. Kang H.-Y., and Schoenung J.M. Electronic waste recycling: a review of US infrastructure and technology options. Resources Conservation and Recycling 45 (2005) 368-400
39. Kim O., and Walker M. The free rider problem: experimental evidence. Public Choice 43 (1984) 3-24
40. Lake I.R., Bateman I.J., and Parfitt J.P. Assessing a kerbside recycling scheme: a quantitative and willingness to pay case study. Journal of Environmental Management 46 (1996) 239-254
41. Lansana Margai F. Evaluating the potential for environmental quality improvement in a community distressed by manmade hazards. Journal of Environmental Management 44 2 (1995) 181-190
42. Lockie S., Lyons K., Lawrence G., and Grice J. Choosing organics: a path analysis of factors underlying the selection of organic food among Australian consumers. Appetite 43 (2004) 135-146
43. Long J.S. Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables (1997), Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA
44. Long J.S., and Freese J. Regression Models for Categorical Dependent Variables using Stata. Second ed (2005), Stata Press, College Station, TX
45. Loureiro M.L., and Hine S. Preferences and willingness to pay for GM labeling policies. Food Policy 29 (2004) 467-483
46. McGuire M. Group size, group homogeneity, and the aggregate provision of pure public goods under Cournot behavior. Public Choice 18 (1974) 107-126
47. Mintel USA, 2005. Attitudes of Young Adults Towards Consumer Electronics-US Mintel Reports, October.
48. Montgomery C.A., and Helvoigt T.L. Changes in attitudes about important of and willingness to pay for salmon recovery in Oregon. Journal of Environmental Management 78 4 (2006) 330-340
49. Nixon H., and Saphores J.-D. Used oil policies to protect the environment: an overview of Canadian experiences. In: Wang K., Xiao G., Nie L., and Yang H. (Eds). Conference Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Traffic and Transportation Studies 1 (2002), American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA 73-80
50. Noe F.P., Hammitt W.E., and Bixler R.D. Park user perceptions of resource and use impacts under varied situations in three national parks. Journal of Environmental Management 49 3 (1997) 323-336
51. Olson M. The Logic of Collective Action (1965), Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
52. Palmer K., Sigman H., and Walls M. The cost of reducing municipal solid waste. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 33 (1997) 128-150
53. Pregibon D. Goodness of link tests for generalized linear models. Applied Statistics 29 (1980) 15-24
54. Raymond M. Backgrounder: Electronic Waste (2003), Raymond Communications, College Park, MD
55. Saphores J.-D., Nixon H., Ogunseitan O., and Shapiro A. Household willingness to recycle electronic waste: an application to California. Environment and Behavior 38 2 (2006) 183-208
56. Savage, M., 2006. Implementation of waste electric and electronic equipment directive in EU-25. Institute for Prospective Technological Studies, European Commission Directorate-General, Joint Research Centre. Accessed June 22, 2006 from 〈ftp://ftp.jrc.es/pub/EURdoc/eur22231en.pdf〉
57. Scanlon, K., 2001. Poison PCs and Toxic TVs: California's Biggest Environmental Crisis That You've Never Heard Of. Sacramento, CA: Californian Against Waste; San Francisco, CA; Materials for the Future Foundation; San Jose, CA: Silicon Valley Toxics Coalition.
58. Schoenung J.M., Ogunseitan O.A., Saphores J.-D.M., and Shapiro A.A. Adopting lead-free electronics: policy differences and knowledge gaps. Journal of Industrial Ecology 8 4 (2004) 59-85
59. Schultz P.W., and Oskamp S. Effort as a moderator of the attitude-behavior relationship: general environmental concern and recycling. Social Psychology Quarterly 59 4 (1996) 375-383
60. Schwartz S.H. Elicitation of moral obligation and self-sacrificing behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 15 (1970) 283-293
61. Sharma, M., 2004. Reverse logistics and environmental considerations in equipment leasing and asset management. Ph.D. Dissertation. Georgia Institute of Technology.
62. Sigman H. Midnight dumping: Public policies and illegal disposal of used oil. RAND Journal of Economics 29 1 (1998) 157-178
63. Smith V. An experimental comparison of three public good decision mechanisms. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics 81 2 (1979) 198-215
64. Steel B.S. Thinking globally and acting locally? Environmental attitudes, behaviour and activism. Journal of Environmental Management 47 1 (1996) 27-36
65. Stern P.C., Dietz T., and Guagnano G.A. The New Ecological Paradigm in social-psychological context. Environment and Behavior 27 6 (1995) 723-743
66. Stewart J. Econometrics (1991), Philip Allan, Cambridge, UK
67. Sweeney J. An experimental investigation of the free rider problem. Social Science Research 2 (1973) 277-292
68. SWICO, 2005. Activity Report 2004. Swiss Association for Information, Communication and Organizational Technology, Zurich, Switzerland.
69. Train K.E. Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation (2003), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
70. Van Liere K.D., and Dunlap R.E. The social bases of environmental concern: a review of hypotheses, explanations, and empirical evidence. Public Opinion Quarterly 44 (1980) 181-199
71. Warr P.G. The private provision of a public good is independent of the distribution of income. Economics Letters 13 (1983) 207-211
72. Young D. Voluntary purchase of public goods. Public Choice 38 (1982) 73-86