A troubled dance: Doing the work of research ethics review

Journal of Academic Ethics

Volumn 6, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 91-104

  Tilley, Susan A ^a  

^a BROCK UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Canadian research ethics boards; REB research review practices; University ethics review

Indexed keywords

EID: 51849136910     PISSN: 15701727     EISSN: 15728544     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10805-008-9058-8     Document Type: Review

References (18)

1. Anderson, P. V. (1996). Ethics, Institutional Review Boards, and the involvement of human participants in composition research. In P. Mortensen, & G. Kirsch (Eds.), Ethics and representation in qualitative studies of literacy (pp. 260-285). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
2. Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada. (1998 with 2000, 2002 and 2005 amendments). Tri-Council policy statement: Ethical conduct for research involving humans. Retrieved April 15, 2008, from http://pre.ethics.gc.ca/english/policystatement/policystatement.cfm.
3. M. H. Fitzgerald 2005 Punctuated equilibrium, moral panics, and the ethics review process Journal of Academic Ethics 2 315 338
4. Foucault, M. (1980). Prison talk. In C. Gordon (Ed.), Michel Foucault: Power/Knowledge, selected interviews, 1972-1977 (pp. 37-54). Brighton, England: Harvester Press.
5. J. P. Grayson R. Myles 2005 How research ethics boards are undermining survey research on Canadian university students Journal of Academic Ethics 2 293 314
6. M. Guillemin L. Gillam 2004 Ethics, reflexivity, and "ethically important moments" in research Qualitative Inquiry 10 261 280
7. K. D. Haggerty 2004 Ethics creep: Governing social sciences research in the name of ethics Qualitative Sociology 27 4 319 414
8. C. Halse A. Honey 2005 Unravelling ethics: Illuminating the moral dilemmas of research ethics Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society: Special Issue on Dilemmas in Feminist Social Research 30 4 1 34
9. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
10. Y. S. Lincoln W. G. Tierney 2004 Qualitative research and institutional review boards Qualitative Inquiry 10 2 219 234
11. I. Pritchard 2002 Travelers and trolls: Practitioner research and institutional review boards Educational Researcher 31 3 3 13
12. Sieber, J. E. (1992). Planning ethically responsible research: A guide for students and internal review boards. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
13. Smith, D. (1990). The conceptual practices of power: A feminist sociology of knowledge. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
14. Social Sciences and Humanities Research Ethics Special Working Committee (2004). Giving voice to the spectrum: Report of the Social Sciences and Humanities Working Committee to the Interagency Advisory Panel on Research Ethics. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: Interagency Panel on Research Ethics.
15. Tilley, S. A., & Ratkovic, S. (2006, May). District school boards and ethics review of school-based research: An Ontario perspective. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Canadian Society for the Study of Education, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
16. Tilley, S. A., Killins, J., & Van Oosten, D. (2005). Connections and tensions between university and school districts: Research review boards and school-based research. Alberta Journal of Education, 51(3), 1-16.
17. van den Hoonaard, W. C. (2002). Walking the tightrope: Ethical issues for qualitative researchers. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
18. Zeni, J. (2001). A guide to ethical decision making for insider research. In J. Zeni (Ed.), Ethical -issues in practitioner research (pp. 153-165). New York: Teachers College Press.