Connections and tensions between university and school districts: Research review boards and school-based research

Alberta Journal of Educational Research

Volumn 51, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 277-292

  Tilley, Susan A ^a,d   Killins, Janet ^b   Van Oosten, Deborah ^c  

^a BROCK UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b District School Board of Niagara

^c UNIVERSITY OF ONTARIO INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Canada)

^d Faculty of Education   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 31144435935     PISSN: 00024805     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (27)

1. Adler, P.A., & Adler, P. (2002). Do university lawyers and the police define research values? In W.C. van den Hoonaard (Ed.), Walking the tightrope: Ethical issues for qualitative researchers (pp. 34-42). Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.
2. Anderson, G. (1998). Fundamentals of educational research. Bristol, PA: Palmer Press.
3. Arhar, J., Holly, M., & Kasten, W. (2000). Action research for teachers: Traveling the yellow brick road. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
4. Canada, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council, Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council and Canadian Institutes of Health. (2002). Memorandum of understanding on the roles and responsibilities in the management of federal grants and awards (MOU). Ottawa: Author.
5. Carson, T., & Sumara, D. (2001). Action research as a living practice. New York: Peter Lang.
6. Cochran-Smith, M. (1994). The power of teacher research in teacher education. In S. Hollingsworth & H. Sockett (Eds.), Teacher research and educational reform: Ninety-third yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education (pp. 142-165). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
7. Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. (1990). Research on teaching and teacher research: The issues that divide. Educational Researcher, 19(2), 2-11.
8. Coffey, A., & Atkinson, P. (1996). Making sense of qualitative data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
9. Constas, M.A. (1992). Qualitative analysis as a public event: The documentation of category development procedures. American Educational Research Journal, 29, 253-266.
10. Creswell, J.W. (2002). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
11. District School Board of Niagara. (2000-2001, rev. 2002). Educational research committee procedures. Niagara, ON: Author.
12. District School Board of Niagara. (2001). Approval of conduct and research policy. Niagara, ON: Author.
13. District School Board of Niagara. (2002). Administrative procedures: Approval and conduct of research. Niagara, ON: Author.
14. Freeman, D. (1998). Doing teacher-research: From inquiry to understanding. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
15. Foucault, M. (1979). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. New York: Vintage Books.
16. Foucault, M. (1980). Prison talk. In C. Gordon (Ed.), Michel Foucault: Power/knowledge, selected interviews, 1972-1977 (pp. 37-54). Brighton, UK: Harvester Press.
17. Goswami, D. (Ed.). (1987). Reclaiming the classroom: Teacher research as an agency for change. Montclair, NJ: Boynton/Cool Publishers.
18. Hollingsworth, S., & Sockett, H. (1994). Positioning teacher research in educational reform: An introduction. In S. Hollingsworth & H. Sockett (Eds.), Teacher research and educational reform: Ninety-third yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education (pp. 1-20). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
19. Owen, M. (2004). Conflict and convergence: The ethics review of action research. Journal of Research Administration, 35(11), 21-30.
20. Page, R.N. (2001). Reshaping graduate preparation in educational research methods: One school's experience. Educational Researcher, 30(5), 19-25.
21. Pritchard, I. (2002). Travelers and trolls: Practitioner research and institutional review boards. Educational Researcher, 31(3), 3-13.
22. Reason, P., & Bradbury. H. (Eds.). (2001). Handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
23. Social Sciences and Humanities Research Ethics Special Working Committee. (2004). Giving voice to the spectrum. Ottawa: Interagency Advisory Panel and Secretariat on Research Ethics.
24. Tilley, S.A. (1998). Conducting respectful research: A critique of practice. Canadian Journal of Education, 23, 316-328.
25. Tri-Council Policy Statement: Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans. (1998 with 2000, 2002 updates). Retrieved November 23, 2004, from: http://www.pre.ethics.gc.ca/english/policystatement/policystatement.cfm
26. van den Hoonaard, W.C. (Ed.). (2002). Walking the tightrope: Ethical issues for qualitative researchers. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.
27. Zeni, J. (Ed.). (2001). A guide to ethical decision making for insider research. In J. Zeni (Ed.), Ethical issues in practitioner research (pp. 153-165). New York: Teachers College Press.