Matched filters, mate choice and the evolution of sexually selected traits

PLoS ONE

Volumn 3, Issue 8, 2008, Pages

  Kostarakos, Konstantinos ^a   Hartbauer, Manfred ^a   Römer, Heiner ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRAZ   (Austria)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ANIMAL COMMUNICATION; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIRECTIONAL HEARING; ECOLOGICAL SPECIALIZATION; EVOLUTION; FEMALE; INSECT; INTERNEURON; MALE; MATE CHOICE; NEUROPHYSIOLOGY; NONHUMAN; SEXUAL SELECTION; SOUND DETECTION; SOUND TRANSMISSION; TUNING CURVE; ANIMAL; DECISION MAKING; GRYLLIDAE; PERCEPTIVE THRESHOLD; PHYSIOLOGY; PREDICTION AND FORECASTING; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; VOCALIZATION;

GRYLLINAE;

ANIMALS; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; GRYLLIDAE; MALE; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; SENSORY THRESHOLDS; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; SOUND LOCALIZATION; VOCALIZATION, ANIMAL;

EID: 51749117774     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003005     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Capranica RR, Moffat AJM (1983) Neurobehavioral correlates of sound communication in anurans. In: Ewert JP, Capranica RR, Ingle D, eds (1983) Vertebrate Neuroethology. New York Plenum. pp 701-730.
2. Gerhardt HC, Schwarz JJ (2001) Auditory tuning and frequency preferences in anurans. In: Ryan MJ, ed (2001) Anuran communication. Washington DC: Smithsonian Institution Press. pp 73-85.
3. Wilczynski W, Keddy-Hector A, Ryan MJ (1992) Call patterns and basilar papilla tuning in cricket frogs. I. Differences among populations and between sexes. Brain Behav Evol 39: 229-237.
4. Witte K, Farris HE, Ryan MJ, Wilczynski W (2005) How cricket frog females deal with a noisy world: habitat-related differences in auditory tuning. Behav Ecol 16: 571-579.
5. Gerhardt HC, Huber F (2002) Acoustic communication in insects and anurans. Chicago, London: University of Chicago Press.
6. Jennions MD, Petrie M (1997) Variation in mate choice and mating preferences: a review of causes and consequences. Biol. Rev. 72: 283-327.
7. Simmons LW, Ritchie MG (1996) Symmetry in the songs of crickets. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 263: 305-311.
8. Simmons, LW, Zuk M, Rotenberry JT (2001) Geographic variation in female preference functions and male songs of the field cricket Teleogryllus oceanicus. Evolution 55: 1386-1394.
9. Scheuber H, Jacot A, Brinkhof MWG (2003) The effect of past condition on a multicomponent signal. Proc R Soc Lond B 270: 1779-1785.
10. Bentsen CL, Hunt J, Jennions MD, Brooks R (2006) Complex multivariate sexual selection on male acoustic signaling in a wild population of Teleogryllus commidus. Am Nat 167 (4): E102-E116.
11. Scheuber H, Jacot A, Brinkhof MWG (2003) Condition dependence of a multicompronent sexual signal in the field cricket Gryllus campestris. Anim Behav 65: 721-727.
12. Nocke H (1972) Physiological aspects of sound communication of crickets (Gryllus campestris L.). J Comp, Physiol A 80: 141-162.
13. Helversen von D, Balakrishnan R, Helversen von O (2004) Acoustic communication in a duetting grasshopper: receiver response variability, male strategies and signal design. Anim Behav 68: 131-144.
14. Bennet-Clark HC (1998) Size and scale effects as constraints in insect sound communication. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B 353: 407-419.
15. Ferreira M, Ferguson JWH (2002) Geographic variation in the calling song of the field cricket Gryllus bimaculatus (Orthoptera: Gryllidae) and its relevance to mate recognition and mate choice. J Zool Lond 257: 163-170.
16. Hill KG, Boyan GS (1976) Directional hearing in crickets. Nature 262: 390-391.
17. Hunt J, Brooks R, Jennions MD (2005) Female mate choice as a condition-dependent life-history trait. Am Nat 166: 79-92.
18. Verburgt L, Fergusen JWH, Weber T (2008) Phonotactic response of female crickets on the Kramer treadmill: methodology, sensory and behavioural implications. J Comp Physiol A 194: 79-96.
19. Schildberger K, Hörner M (1988) The function of auditory neurons in cricket phonotaxis. I. Influence of hyperpolarization of identified neurons on sound localization. J Comp Physiol A 163: 621-631.
20. Atkins G, Henley J, Handysides R, Stout J (1992) Evaluation of the behavioral roles of ascending auditory interneurons in calling song phonotaxis by the female cricket (Acheta domesticus) J Comp Physiol A 170: 363-372.
21. Huber F, Kleindienst H-U, Weber T, Thorsen J (1984) Auditory behaviour of the cricket III. Tracking of male calling song by surgically and developmentally one-eared females and the curious role of the anterior tympanum. J Comp Physiol A 155: 725-738.
22. Pollack GS (1986) Discrimination of calling song models by the cricket, Teleogryllus oceanicus: The influence of sound direction on neural coding of the stimulus temporal pattern and on phonotactic behavior. J Comp Physiol A 158: 549-561.
23. Schildberger K (1994) The auditory pathway of crickets: Adaptations for intraspecific communication. In: Neural Basis of Behavioural Adaptations. Schildberger K, Elsner N. editors. Fortschr Zool Stuttgart, New York, Gustav Fischer 39: 209-225.
24. Michelsen A (1998) Biophysical basis of sound localization in insects. In: Hoy RR, Popper AN, Fay RR, eds (1998) Comparative hearing: Insects. New York: Springer. pp 18-22.
25. Thorsen J, Weber T, Huber F (1982) Auditory behaviour of the cricket. II. Simplicity of calling-song recognition in Gryllus and anomalous phonotaxis at abnormal carrier frequencies. J Comp Physiol A 146: 361-378.
26. Wendler G, Löhe G (1993) The role of the medial septum in the acoustic trachea of the cricket Gryllus bimaculatus. J Comp Physiol A 173: 557-564.
27. Michelsen A, Löhe G (1995) Tuned directionality in cricket ears. Nature 375: 639.
28. Ryan MJ, Keddy-Hector A (1992) Directional patterns of female mate choice and the role of sensory biases. Am Nat 139: S4-S35.
29. Ryan MJ, Rand AS (1993) Sexual selection and signal evolution: the ghost of biases past. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B 340: 187-195.
30. Gerhardt HC (1991) Female mate choice in treefrogs: static and dynamic acoustic choice criteria. Anim Behav 42: 615-635.
31. Greenfield MD (2002) Signallers and receivers: mechanisms and evolution of arthropod communication. Oxford: Oxford Univ Press.
32. Brooks R, Hunt J, Blows MW, Smith MJ, Bussière LF, Jennions, MD (2005) Experimental evidence for multivariate stabilizing sexual selection. Evolution 59: 871-880.
33. Rheinlaender J, Römer H (1986) Insect hearing in the field I. The use of identified nerve cells as "biological microphones". J Comp Physiol A 158: 647-651.
34. Michelsen A, Rohrseitz K (1997) Directional sound processing and interaural sound transmission in a small and a large grasshopper. J Exp Biol 198: 1817-1827.
35. Gilbert F, Elsner N (2000) Directional hearing of a grasshopper in the field. J Exp Biol 203: 983-993.
36. Sun LX, Wilczynski W, Rand AS, Ryan MJ (2001) Trade-off in short- and long-distance communication in túngara (Physalaemus pustulosus) and cricket (Acris crepitans) frogs. Behav Ecol 11: 102-109.
37. Sharov AG (1968) Phylogeny of the Orthopteroidea (Transl 1971, Israel Program for Scientific Translation, Jerusalem). Trans Paleontol Inst Acas Sci USSR 118: 1-216.
38. Dirsh VM (1975) A preliminary revision of the families and sub-families of Acridoidea (Orthoptera, Insecta). Bull Brit Mus (Nat hist) 10: 349-419.
39. Kirkpatrick M (1987) The evolutionary forces acting on female mating preferences in polygynous animals. In: Bradbury JW, Andersson MB, eds (1987) Sexual selection: testing the alternatives. Chichester: Wiley. pp 67-82.
40. Guilford T, Dawkins MS (1991) Receiver psychology and the evolution of animal signals. Anim Behav 42: 1-14.
41. Hill GE (1994) Geographic variation in male ornamentation and female preference in the house finch: a comparative test of models of sexual selection. Behav Ecol 5: 64-73.
42. Dawkins MS, Guilford T (1996) Sensory bias and the adaptiveness of female choice. Am Nat 148: 937-942.
43. Hedwig B, Poulet JFA (2004) Complex auditory behaviour emerges from simple reactive steering. Nature 430: 781-785.
44. Hedwig B, Poulet JFA (2005) Mechanisms underlying phonotactic steering in the cricket Gryllus bimaculatus revealed with a fast trackball system. J Exp Biol 208: 915-927.