Distinguishing thermodynamic and kinetic views of the preferential hydration of protein surfaces

Biophysical Journal

Volumn 95, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 2219-2225

  Hamsa Priya, M ^b   Shah, J K ^a   Asthagiri, D ^b   Paulaitis, M E ^b  

^a University of Notre Dame   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LYSOZYME; MICROCOCCAL NUCLEASE; PROTEIN; WATER;

ARTICLE; BINDING SITE; CHEMICAL MODEL; CHEMISTRY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; KINETICS; SURFACE PROPERTY; THERMODYNAMICS;

BINDING SITES; COMPUTER SIMULATION; KINETICS; MICROCOCCAL NUCLEASE; MODELS, CHEMICAL; MURAMIDASE; PROTEINS; SURFACE PROPERTIES; THERMODYNAMICS; WATER;

EID: 51649131252     PISSN: 00063495     EISSN: 15420086     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1529/biophysj.108.133553     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Neal, B. L., D. Asthagiri, and A. M. Lenhoff. 1998. Molecular origins of osmotic second virial coefficients of proteins. Biophys. J. 75:2469-2477.
2. Asthagiri, D., B. L. Neal, and A. M. Lenhoff. 1999. Calculation of short range interactions between proteins. Biophys. Chem. 78:219-231.
3. Paulaitis, M. E., and L. R. Pratt. 2002. Hydration theory for molecular biophysics. Adv. Protein Chem. 62:283-310.
4. Pratt, L. R., and R. A. LaViolette. 1998. Quasi-chemical theories of associated liquids. Mol. Phys. 94:909-915.
5. Pratt, L. R., and S. B. Rempe. 1999. Quasi-chemical theory and implicit solvent models for simulations. In Simulation and Theory of Electrostatic Interactions in Solution. Computational Chemistry, Biophysics, and Aqueous Solutions. AIP Conference Proceedings. L. R. Pratt, and G. Hummer, editors. AIP Press, Melville, NY.
6. Paliwal, A., D. Asthagiri, D. Abras, A. M. Lenhoff, and M. E. Paulaitis. 2005. Light-scattering studies of protein solutions: role of hydration in weak protein-protein interactions. Biophys. J. 89:1564-1573.
7. Babu, S., and C. Lim. 1999. Theory of ionic hydration: insights from molecular dynamics simulations and experiment. J. Phys. Chem. B. 103:7958-7968.
8. 2+ and first-transition-row metals. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126:1285-1289.
9. Denisov, V. P., and B. Halle. 1996. Protein hydration dynamics in aqueous solution. Faraday Discuss. 103:244-274.
10. Otting, G., E. Liepinsh, and K. Wuthrich. 1991. Protein hydration in aqueous solution. Science. 254:974-980.
11. Dellerue, S., A. J. Petrescu, J. C. Smith, and M. C. Bellissent-Funel. 2001. Radially softening diffusive motions in a globular protein. Biophys. J. 81:1666-1676.
12. Pal, S. K., J. Peon, and A. H. Zewail. 2002. Biological water at the protein surface: dynamical solvation probed directly with femtosecond resolution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 99:1763-1768.
13. Rocchi, C., A. R. Bizzarri, and S. Cannistraro. 1997. Water residence times around copper plastocyanin: a molecular dynamics simulation approach. Chem. Phys. 214:261-276.
14. Makarov, V. A., B. K. Andrews, P. E. Smith, and B. M. Pettitt. 2000. Residence times of water molecules in the hydration sites of myoglobin. Biophys. J. 79:2966-2974.
15. Garcia, A. E., and L. Stiller. 1993. Computation of the mean residence time of water in the hydration shells of biomolecules. J. Comput. Chem. 14:1396-1406.
16. Schröder, C., T. Rudas, S. Boresch, and O. Steinhauser. 2006. Simulation studies of the protein water interface. I. Properties at the molecular resolution. J. Chem. Phys. 124:1-18.
17. Brunne, R. M., E. Liepinsh, G. Otting, K. Wüthrich, and W. F. van Gunsteren. 1993. Hydration of proteins: a comparison of experimental residence times of water molecules solvating the bovine pancreatic trypsin inhibitor with theoretical model calculations. J. Mol. Biol. 231:1040-1048.
18. Bandyopadhyay, S., S. Chakraborty, and B. Bagchi. 2005. Secondary structure sensitivity of hydrogen bond lifetime dynamics in the protein hydration layer. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127:16660-16667.
19. Bandyopadhyay, S., S. Chakraborty, S. Balasubramanian, and B. Bagchi. 2005. Sensitivity of polar solvation dynamics to the secondary structures of aqueous proteins and the role of surface exposure of the probe. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127:4071-4075.
20. Beck, D. A. C., D. O. V. Alonso, and V. Daggett. 2003. A microscopic view of peptide and protein solvation. Biophys. Chem. 100:221-237.
21. Zwanzig, R. 2001. Nonequilibrium Statistical Mechanics. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
22. Gillespie, D. T. 2002. The chemical Langevin and Fokker-Planck equations for the reversible isomerization reaction. J. Phys. Chem. A. 106:5063-5071.
23. Diamond, R., D. C. Phillips, C. C. F. Blake, and A. C. T. North. 1974. Real space refinement of the structure of hen egg white lysozyme. J. Mol. Biol. 82:371-391.
24. Jorgensen, W., J. Chandrasekhar, J. D. Madura, R. W. Impey, and M. L. Klein. 1983. Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water. J. Chem. Phys. 79:926-935.
25. 2+ and thymidine-3′,5′-bisphosphate. J. Biomol. NMR. 10:143-164.
26. Kalé, L., R. Skeel, M. Bhandarkar, R. Brunner, N. G. N. Kraweta, J. Phillips, A. Shinozaki, K. Varadarajan, and K. Schulten. 1999. NAMD2: greater scalability for parallel molecular dynamics. J. Comput. Phys. 151:283-312.
27. MacKerell, A. D., N. Banavali, and N. Foloppe. 2000. Development and current status of the CHARMM force field for nucleic acids. Biopolymers. 56:257-265.
28. Ryckaert, J. P., G. Ciccotti, and H. J. C. Berendsen. 1977. Numerical integration of the Cartesian equations of motion of a system with constraints: molecular dynamics of n-alkanes. J. Comput. Phys. 23:327-341.
29. Asthagiri, D., A. Paliwal, D. Abras, A. M. Lenhoff, and M. E. Paulaitis. 2005. A Consistent experimental and modeling approach to light-scattering studies of protein-protein interactions in solution. Biophys. J. 88:3300-3309.
30. McCammon, J. A., and S. C. Harvey. 1987. Dynamics of Proteins and Nucleic Acids. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.