Magnetic resonance imaging of the spine at 3 Tesla

Seminars in Musculoskeletal Radiology

Volumn 12, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 238-252

  Fries, Peter ^a   Runge, Val M ^b   Kirchin, Miles A ^c   Watkins, David M ^b   Buecker, Arno ^a   Schneider, Guenther ^a  

^a SAARLAND UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Bracco Imaging SpA   (Italy)

Author keywords

3 Tesla; Degenerative disease; Magnetic resonance; Neoplastic disease; Spine

Indexed keywords

ARTIFACT; CERVICAL SPINE RADIOGRAPHY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DIELECTRIC CONSTANT; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; RADIATION ABSORPTION; RADIODIAGNOSIS; REVIEW; SPINE RADIOGRAPHY; THORAX RADIOGRAPHY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; THREE DIMENSIONAL TESLA MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING;

ARTIFACTS; CONTRAST MEDIA; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MAGNETICS; SPINAL DISEASES; SPINAL NEOPLASMS; SPINE;

EID: 51649126037     PISSN: 10897860     EISSN: 1098898X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-0028-1083107     Document Type: Review

References (12)

1. Frayne R, Goodyear BG, Dickhoff P, Lauzon ML, Sevick RJ. Magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0 Tesla: challenges and advantages in clinical neurological imaging. Invest Radiol 2003;38(7):385-402
2. Phalke VV, Gujar S, Quint DJ. Comparison of 3.0 T versus 1.5 T MR: imaging of the spine. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 2006;16(2):241-248 ix
3. Shapiro MD. MR imaging of the spine at 3T. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2006;14(1):97-108
4. Lichy MP, Wietek BM, Mugler JP III, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the body trunk using a single-slab, 3-dimensional, T2-weighted turbo-spin-echo sequence with high sampling efficiency (SPACE) for high spatial resolution imaging: initial clinical experiences. Invest Radiol 2005;40(12):754-760
5. Wetzel SG, Johnson G, Tan AG, et al. Three-dimensional, T1-weighted gradient-echo imaging of the brain with a volumetric interpolated examination. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2002;23(6):995-1002
6. Rofsky NM, Lee VS, Laub G, et al. Abdominal MR imaging with a volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination. Radiology 1999;212(3):876-884
7. Mugler JP III, Bao S, Mulkern RV, et al. Optimized single-slab three-dimensional spin-echo MR imaging of the brain. Radiology 2000;216(3):891-899
8. Mugler JP III, Kiefer B, Brookeman JR. Three-dimensional T2-weighted imaging of the brain using very long spin-echo trains. In: Proceedings of the 8th Annual Meeting of ISMRM, Denver, 2000:687
9. Rodegerdts EA, Boss A, Riemarzik K, et al. 3D imaging of the whole spine at 3T compared to 1.5T: initial experiences. Acta Radiol 2006;47(5):488-493
10. Colosimo C, Cianfoni A, Di Leila GM, Gaudino S. Contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the spine: when, why and how? How to optimize contrast protocols in MR imaging of the spine. Neuroradiology 2006;48(suppl 1):18-33
11. Maravilla KR, Maldjian JA, Schmalfuss IM, et al. Contrast enhancement of central nervous system lesions: multicenter intraindividual crossover comparative study of two MR contrast agents. Radiology 2006;240(2):389-400
12. Pintaske J, Martirosian P, Graf H, et al. Relaxivity of Gadopentetate Dimeglumine (Magnevist), Gadobutrol (Gadovist), and Gadobenate Dimeglumine (MultiHance) in human blood plasma at 0.2, 1.5, and 3 Tesla. Invest Radiol 2006;41(3):213-221