|
Volumn 16, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 241-248
|
Comparison of 3.0 T versus 1.5 T MR: Imaging of the Spine
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
GADOLINIUM;
ARTIFACT;
DIFFUSION WEIGHTED IMAGING;
FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING;
HUMAN;
IMAGING SYSTEM;
INTERMETHOD COMPARISON;
MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY;
MAGNETISM;
NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING;
OPTICAL RESOLUTION;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
PROTON NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE;
REVIEW;
SIGNAL NOISE RATIO;
SPINE RADIOGRAPHY;
ARTIFACTS;
CONTRAST MEDIA;
DIFFUSION MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING;
GADOLINIUM DTPA;
HUMANS;
IMAGE ENHANCEMENT;
IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL;
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING;
MAGNETICS;
SPINE;
|
EID: 33747144129
PISSN: 10525149
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1016/j.nic.2006.02.005 Document Type: Review |
Times cited : (40)
|
References (10)
|