Rupture process of the 2004 Parkfield earthquake from near-fault seismic waveform and geodetic records

Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth

Volumn 113, Issue 7, 2008, Pages

  Kim, Ahyi ^a   Dreger, Douglas S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EARTHQUAKE RUPTURE; GPS; PARKFIELD EARTHQUAKE 2004; SEISMIC MOMENT; STRONG MOTION; SYNTHETIC APERTURE RADAR; WAVEFORM ANALYSIS;

EID: 51549122016     PISSN: 21699313     EISSN: 21699356     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1029/2007JB005115     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Allmann, B. P., and P. M. Shearer (2007), Spatial and temporal stress drop variations in small earthquakes near Parkfield, California, J. Geophys. Res., 112, B04305, doi:10.1029/2006JB004395.
2. Bakun, W. H., and A. G. Lindh (1985), The Parkfield, California, earthquake prediction experiment, Science, 229, 619-624.
3. Bakun, W. H., and T. V. McEvilly (1979), Earthquakes near Parkfield, California: Comparing the 1934 and 1966 sequences, Science, 205, 1375-1377.
4. Bakun, W. H., and T. V. McEvilly (1984), Recurrence models and Parkfield, California, earthquakes, J. Geophys. Res., 89, 3051-3058.
5. Ben-Zion, Y., and P. Malin (1991), San Andreas fault zone head waves near Parkfield, California, Science, 251, 1592-1594.
6. Colice, B., and G. Beroza (1994), Slip distribution of the 1992 Landers earthquake and its implications for earthquake source mechanics, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 84, 692-712.
7. Custódio, S., and R. J. Archuleta (2007), Parkfield earthquakes: Characteristic or complementary?, J. Geophys. Res., 112, B05310, doi:10.1029/2006JB004617.
8. w6.0 Parkfield, California, earthquake: Inversion of near-source ground motion using multiple data sets, Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, L23312, doi:10.1029/2005GL024417.
9. Das, S., and C. Henry (2003), Spatial relation between main earthquake slip and its aftershock distribution, Rev. Geophys., 41(3), 1013, doi:10.1029/2002RG000119.
10. Dreger, D. (1997), The large aftershocks of the Northridge earthquake and their relationship to mainshock slip and fault zone complexity, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 87, 1259-1266.
11. Dreger, D., and A. Kim (2006), Rupture process of the 2004 Parkfield earthquake utilizing near-fault seismic records and implications for ShakeMap, paper presented at SMIP06 Seminar on Utilization of Strong-Motion Data, Calif. Geol. Surv., Oakland, Calif., 28 Sept.
12. Dreger, D., and B. Romanowicz (1994), Source characteristics of events in the San Francisco Bay Region, U. S. Geol. Surv. Open File Rep., 94-176, 301-309.
13. Dreger, D. S., L. Gee, P. Lombard, M. H. Murray, and B. Romanowicz (2005), Rapid finite-source analysis and near-fault strong ground motions: Application to the 2003 Mw6.5 San Simeon and 2004 Mw6.0 Parkfield earthquakes, Seismol. Res. Lett., 76, 40-48.
14. Fletcher, J. B., P. Spudich, and L. M. Baker (2006), Rupture propagation of the 2004 Parkfield earthquake from observations at the UPSAR array, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 96, S129-S142.
15. Graves, R. W., and D. J. Wald (2001), Resolution analysis of finite fault source inversion using one- and three-dimensional Green's functions: 1. Strong motions, J. Geophys. Res., 106(B5), 8745-8766.
16. Hartzell, S. H., and T. H. Heaton (1983), Inversion of strong ground motion and teleseismic waveform data for the fault rupture history of the 1979 Imperial Valley, California, earthquake, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 73, 1553-1583.
17. Jahnke, G., H. Igel, and Y. Ben-Zion (2002), Three-dimensional calculations of fault zone guided wave in various irregular structures, Geophys. J. Int., 151, 416-426.
18. Johanson, I. A., E. J. Fielding, F. Rolandone, and R. Bürgmann (2006), Coseismic and postseismic slip of the 2004 Parkfield earthquake from space-geodetic data, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 96, S269-S282.
19. Korneev, V. A., R. M. Nadeau, and T. V. McEvilly (2003), Seismological studies at Parkfield IX: Fault zone imaging using guided wave attenuation, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 93, 1415-1426.
20. Langbein, J., et al. (2005), Preliminary report on the 28 September 2004, M 6.0 Parkfield, California earthquake, Seismol. Res. Lett., 76, 10-26.
21. Lawson, C. L., and R. J. Hanson (1974), Solving Least Squares Problems, 340 pp., Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, N. J.
22. Li, Y.-G., and J. E. Vidale (1996), Low-velocity fault-zone guided waves: Numerical investigations of trapping efficiency, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 86, 371-378.
23. Liu, P., S. Custódio, and R. J. Archuleta (2006), Kinematic inversion of the 2004 Mw6.0 Parkfield earthquake including site effects, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 96, S143-S158.
24. Mendoza, C., and S. H. Hartzell (1988), Aftershock patterns and mainshock faulting, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 78, 1438-1449.
25. Michael, A. J., and D. Eberhart-Phillips (1991), Relationships between fault behavior, subsurface geology, and three-dimensional velocity models, Science, 253, 651-654.
26. Michelini, A., and T. V. McEvilly (1991), Seismological studies at Parkfield, part I: Simultaneous inversion for velocity structure and hypocenters using cubic B-splines parameterization, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 81, 524-552.
27. Murray, J., and J. Langbein (2006), Slip on the San Andreas fault at Parkfield, California, over two earthquake cycles, and the implications for seismic hazard, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 96, S283-S303.
28. Ripperger, J., and P. M. Mai (2004), Fast computation of static stress changes on 2D faults from final slip distributions, Geophys. Res. Lett., 31, L18610, doi:10.1029/2004GL020594.
29. Rolandone, F., D. Dreger, M. Murray, and R. Bürgmann (2006), Coseismic slip distribution of the 2003 M 6.6 San Simeon earthquake, California, determined from GPS measurements and seismic waveform data, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L16315, doi:10.1029/2006GL027079.
30. Saikia, C. K. (1994), Modified frequency-wavenumber algorithm for regional seismograms using Filon's quadrature: Modeling of Lg waves in eastern North America, Geophys. J. Int., 118, 142-158.
31. Segall, P., and Y. Dou (1993), How similar were the 1934 and 1966 Parkfield earthquakes?, J. Geophys. Res., 98, 4527-4538.
32. Shakal, A., H. Haddadi, V. Graizer, K. Lin, and M. Huang (2006), Some key features of the strong-motion data from the M6.0 Parkfield, California, earthquake of 28 September 2004, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 96, S90-S118.
33. Stein, R. S., G. C. P. King, and J. Lin (1994), Stress triggering of the 1994 M = 6.7 Northridge, California, earthquake by its predecessors, Science, 265, 1432-1435.
34. Thurber, C., H. Zhang, F. Waldhauser, J. Hardebeck, A. Michaels, and D. Eberhart-Phillips (2006), Three-dimensional compressional wavespeed model, earthquake relocations, and focal mechanisms for the Parkfield, California, region, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 96, S39-S49.
35. Wald, D. J., and R. W. Graves (2001), Resolution analysis of finite fault source inversion using one- and three-dimensional Green's functions: 2. Combining seismic and geodetic data, J. Geophys. Res., 106(B5), 8767-8788.
36. Wald, D. J., T. H. Heaton, and D. V. Helmberger (1991), Rupture model of the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake from the inversion of strong motion and broadband teleseismic data, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 81, 1540-1572.
37. Wang, R., F. Martin, and F. Roth (2003), Computation of deformation induced by earthquakes in multi-layered elastic crust: FORTRAN programs EDGRN/EDCMP, Comput. Geosci., 29, 195-207.
38. Wessel, P., and W. H. F. Smith (1995), New version of the generic mapping tools released, Eos Trans. AGU, 76(29), 329.