Disease prediction power and stability of differential expressed genes

BioMedical Engineering and Informatics: New Development and the Future - Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on BioMedical Engineering and Informatics, BMEI 2008

Volumn 1, Issue , 2008, Pages 265-268

  Yao, Chen ^a   Zhang, Min ^a   Zou, Jinfeng ^a   Gong, Xue ^a   Zhang, Lin ^b   Wang, Chen Guang ^a   Guo, Zheng ^a,b  

^a HARBIN MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ELECTRONIC SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY OF CHINA   (China)

Author keywords

Classification; Differential expressed gene; Reproducibility

Indexed keywords

CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION); COMPUTER NETWORKS; FORECASTING; GENES; SUGAR (SUCROSE);

CLASSIFICATION; DIFFERENTIAL EXPRESSED GENE; INFORMATICS; REPRODUCIBILITY;

BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING;

EID: 51549111176     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/BMEI.2008.59     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (13)

1. Golub, T.R., et al., Molecular classification of cancer:class discovery and class prediction by gene expression monitoring. Science, 1999. 286(5439): p. 531-7.
2. Lapointe, J., et al., Gene expression profiling identifies clinically relevant subtypes of prostate cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2004. 101(3): p. 811-6.
3. Ramaswamy, S., et al., Multiclass cancer diagnosis using tumor gene expression signatures. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2001. 98(26): p. 15149-54.
4. Chen, J.J., et al., Selection of differentially expressed genes in microarray data analysis. Pharmacogenomics J, 2006.
5. Tusher, V.G., R. Tibshirani, and G. Chu, Significance analysis of microarrays applied to the ionizing radiation response. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2001. 98(9): p. 5116-21.
6. Ein-Dor, L., et al., Outcome signature genes in breast cancer: is there a unique set? Bioinformatics, 2005. 21(2): p. 171-8.
7. Guo, L., et al., Rat toxicogenomic study reveals analytical consistency across microarray platforms. Nat Biotechnol, 2006. 24(9): p. 1162-9.
8. Klebanov, L., et al., Statistical methods and microarray data. Nat Biotechnol, 2007. 25(1): p. 25-6; author reply 26-7.
9. Chen, X., et al., Novel endothelial cell markers in hepatocellular carcinoma. Mod Pathol, 2004. 17(10): p. 1198-210.
10. Wang, D., et al., Effects of replacing the unreliable cDNA microarray measurements on the disease classification based on gene expression profiles and functional modules. Bioinformatics, 2006. 22(23): p. 2883-9.
11. Michiels, S., S. Koscielny, and C. Hill, Prediction of cancer outcome with microarrays: a multiple random validation strategy. Lancet, 2005. 365(9458): p. 488-92.
12. Dudoit, S., J. Fridlyand, and T. Speed, Comparison of discrimination methods for the classification of tymours using gene expression data. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 2002. 97: p. 77-87.
13. Chen, J., et al., Reproducibility of microarray data: a further analysis of microarray quality control (MAQC)data. BMC Bioinformatics, 2007. 8(1): p. 412.