Do phosphorus requirements for RNA limit genome size in crustacean zooplankton?

Genome

Volumn 51, Issue 9, 2008, Pages 685-691

  Hessen, Dag O ^a   Ventura, Marc ^b,c   Elser, James J ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

^b NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Denmark)

^c CENTRE D ESTUDIS AVANÇATS DE BLANES CEAB CSIC   (Spain)

^d ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cladoceran; Copepod; Genome size; Phosphorus; RNA

Indexed keywords

PHOSPHORUS; RNA;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CRUSTACEA; GENETICS; GENOME; METABOLISM; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; ZOOPLANKTON;

ANIMALS; CRUSTACEA; GENOME; PHOSPHORUS; RNA; SPECIES SPECIFICITY; ZOOPLANKTON;

COPEPODA; CRUSTACEA;

EID: 51549100120     PISSN: 08312796     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1139/G08-053     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Alcaraz, L.D., Olmedo, G., Bonilla, G., Cerritos, R., Hernández, G., Cruz, A., et al. 2008. The genome of Bacillus coahuilensis reveals adaptations essential for survival in the relic of an ancient marine environment. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 105: 5803-5808. doi:10.1073/pnas.0800981105.
2. Alonso, M. 1996. Crustacea: Branchiopoda. In Fauna Ibérica. Vol. 7. Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Madrid.
3. Andersen, T., and Hessen, D.O. 1991. Carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus content in common crustacean zooplankton species. Limnol. Oceanogr. 36: 807-814.
4. Baudouin-Cornu, P., Surdin-Kerjan, Y., Marliere, P., and Thomas, D. 2001. Molecular evolution of protein atomic composition. Science (Washington, D.C.), 293: 297-300. doi:10.1126/science.1061052. PMID:11452124.
5. Beaton, M.J., and Hebert, P.D.N. 1989. Miniature genomes and endopolyploidy in cladoceran crustaceans. Genome, 32: 1048-1053. doi:10.1139/g89-552.
6. Beaton, M.J., and Hebert, P.D.N. 1997. The cellular basis of divergent head morphologies in Daphnia. Limnol. Oceanogr. 42: 346-356.
7. Beermann, S. 1977. Diminution of heterochromatic chromosomal segments in Cyclops (Crustacea, Copepoda). Chromosoma, 60: 297-344. doi:10.1007/BF00292858. PMID:870296.
8. Brooks, J.L. 1957. The systematics of North American Daphnia. Mem. Conn. Acad. Arts Sci. 13: 1-180.
9. Carrillo, P., Villar-Argaiz, M., and Medina-Sánchez, J.M. 2001. Relationship between N:P ratio and growth rate during the life cycle of calanoid copepods: an in situ measurement. J. Plankton Res. 23: 537-547. doi:10.1093/plankt/23.5.537.
10. Cavalier-Smith, T. 1978. Nuclear volume control by nucleoskeletal DNA, selections for cell volume and cell growth rate and the solution of the DNA C-value paradox. J. Cell Sci. 34: 247-278. PMID:372199.
11. Cavalier-Smith, T. (Editor). 1985. Cell volume and the evolution of eukaryotic genome size. In The evolution of genome size. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester. pp. 104-184.
12. Dawkins, R. 1976. The selfish gene. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
13. Elser, J.J., Dobberfuhl, D.R., MacKay, N.A., and Schampel, J.H. 1996. Organism size, life history, and N:P stoichiometry: toward a unified view of cellular and ecosystem processes. Bioscience, 46: 674-684. doi:10.2307/1312897.
14. Elser, J.J., Fagan, W.F., Denno, R.F., Dobberfuhl, D.R., Folarin, A., Huberty, A., et al. 2000. Nutritional constraints in terrestrial and freshwater food webs. Nature (London), 408: 578-580. doi:10.1038/35046058. PMID:11117743.
15. Elser, J.J., Hayakawa, H., and Urabe, J. 2001. Nutrient limitation reduces food quality for zooplankton: Daphnia response to seston phosphorus enrichment. Ecology, 82: 898-903.
16. Elser, J.J., Acharya, K., Kyle, M., Cotner, J., Makino, W., Markow, T., et al. 2003. Growth rate-stoichiometry couplings in diverse biota. Ecol. Lett. 6: 936-943. doi:10.1046/j.1461-0248.2003.00518.x.
17. Flössner, D. 2000. Die Haplopoda und Cladocera (ohne Bosminidae) Mitteleuropas. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden.
18. Gorokhova, E., Dowling, T.E., Weider, L.J., Crease, T.J., and Elser, J.J. 2002. Functional and ecological significance of rDNA intergenic spacer variation in a clonal organism under divergent selection for production rate. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 269: 2373-2379. doi:10.1098/rspb.2002. 2145.
19. Gregory, T.R. 2001. Coincidence, coevolution, or causation? DNA content, cell size, and the C-value enigma. Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc. 76: 65-101. doi:10.1017/S1464793100005595.PMID:11325054.
20. Gregory, T.R. 2008. Animal Genome Size Database [online]. Available from http://www.genomesize.com.
21. Gregory, T.R., Hebert, P.D.N., and Kolasa, J. 2000. Evolutionary implications of the relationship between genome size and body size in flatworms and copepods. Heredity, 84: 201-208. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2540.2000.00661. x. PMID:10762390.
22. Hardie, D.C., and Hebert, P.D.N. 2004. Genome-size evolution in fishes. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 61: 1636-1646. doi:10.1139/f04-106.
23. Hebert, P.D.N., and Finston, T.L. 1993. A taxonomic reevaluation of North American Daphnia (Crustacea: Cladocera). 1. The D. similis complex. Can. J. Zool. 71: 908-925. doi:10.1139/z93-119.
24. Hebert, P.D.N., and Finston, T.J. 1996. A taxonomic reevaluation of North American Daphnia (Crustacea: Cladocera). 2. New species in the Daphnia pulex group from the south-central United States and Mexico. Can. J. Zool. 74: 632-653. doi:10.1139/z96-073.
25. Hebert, P.D.N., and Finston, T.L. 1997. A taxonomic reevaluation of North American Daphnia (Crustacea: Cladocera). 3. The D. catawba complex. Can. J. Zool. 75: 1254-1261. doi:10.1139/z97-148.
26. Hessen, D.O. 1992. Nutrient element limitation of zooplankton production. Am. Nat. 140: 799-814. doi:10.1086/285441.
27. Hessen, D.O., Faafeng, B.A., Smith, V.H., Bakkestuen, V., and Walseng, B. 2006. Extrinsic and intrinsic controls of zooplankton diversity in lakes. Ecology, 87: 433-443. doi:10.1890/05-0352. PMID:16637368.
28. Hessen, D.O., Jensen, T.C., Kyle, M., and Elser, J.J. 2007. RNA responses to N- and P-limitation; reciprocal regulation of stoichiometry and growth rate in Brachionus. Funct. Ecol. 21: 956-962. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2435. 2007.01306.x.
29. Lewis, W.M., Jr. 1985. Nutrient scarcity as an evolutionary cause of haploidy. Am. Nat. 125: 692-701.
30. Lynch, M. 2007. The origins of genome architecture. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Mass.
31. Main, T.M., Dobberfuhl, D.R., and Elser, J.J. 1997. N:P stoichiometry and ontogeny of crustacean zooplankton: a test of the growth rate hypothesis. Limnol. Oceanogr. 42: 1474-1478.
32. Markow, T.A., Raphael, B., Dobberfuhl, D., Breitmeyer, C.M., Elser, J.J., and Pfeiler, E. 1999. Elemental stoichiometry of Drosophila and their hosts. Funct. Ecol. 13: 78-84. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2435.1999.00285.x.
33. McCauley, E. 1984. The estimation of the abundance and biomass of zooplankton in samples. In A manual on methods for the assessment of secondary productivity in fresh waters. Edited by J.A. Downing and F.H. Rigler. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford. pp. 228-265.
34. McKee, M.J., and Knowles, C.O. 1987. Levels of protein, RNA, DNA, glycogen and lipid during growth and development of Daphnia magna. Freshw. Biol. 18: 341-351. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2427.1987.tb01318.x.
35. McLaren, I.A., Sevigny, J.M., and Corkett, C.J. 1988. Body sizes, development rates, and genome sizes among Calanus species. Hydrobiologia, 167-168: 275-284. doi:10.1007/BF00026315.
36. Nardon, C., Weiss, M., Vieira, C., and Biémont, C. 2003. Variation of the genome size estimate with environmental conditions in Drosophila melanogaster. Cytometry A, 55A: 43-49. doi:10.1002/cyto.a.10061.
37. Negrea, S. 1983. Crustacea. Vol. 4. Fasc. 12. Cladocera. In Fauna Republicii Socialiste Romania. Academiei Republicii Socialiste România, Bucharest.
38. Orgel, L.E., and Crick, F.H.C. 1980. Selfish DNA: the ultimate parasite. Nature (London), 284: 604-607. doi:10.1038/284604a0. PMID:7366731.
39. Prokopowich, C.D., Gregory, T.R., and Crease, T.J. 2003. The correlation between rDNA copy number and genome size in eukaryotes. Genome, 46: 48-50. doi:10.1139/g02-103. PMID: 12669795.
40. Ranea, J.A., Grant, A., Thornton, J.M., and Orengo, C.A. 2005. Macroeconomic principles explain an optimal genome size in bacteria. Trends Genet. 21: 21-25. doi:10.1016/j.tig.2004.11.014. PMID:15680509.
41. Rasch, E.M., and Wyngaard, G.A. 2006. Genome sizes of cyclopoid copepods (Crustacea): evidence of evolutionary constraint. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 87: 625-635. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8312.2006.00610.x.
42. Rees, D.J., Dufresne, F., Glemet, H., and Belzile, C. 2007. Amphipod genome sizes: first estimates for Arctic species reveal genomic giants. Genome, 50: 151-158. doi:10.1139/G06-155. PMID:17546080.
43. Sterner, R.W. 1993. Daphnia growth on varying quality of Scenedesmus - mineral limitation of zooplankton. Ecology, 74: 2351-2360. doi:10.2307/1939587.
44. Sterner, R.W., and Elser, J.J. 2002. Ecological stoichiometry. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
45. Sutcliffe, W.H.J. 1970. Relationship between growth rate and ribonucleic acid concentration in some invertebrates. J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 27: 606-609.
46. Ventura, M. 2006. Linking biochemical and elemental composition of freshwater and marine crustacean zooplankton. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 327: 233-246. doi:10.3354/meps327233.
47. Villar-Argaiz, M., and Sterner, R.W. 2002. Life history bottlenecks in Diaptomus clavipes induced by phosphorus-limited algae. Limnol. Oceanogr. 47: 1229-1233.
48. Vrede, T., Andersen, T., and Hessen, D.O. 1999. Phosphorus distribution in three crustacean zooplankton species. Limnol. Oceanogr. 44: 225-229.
49. Wagner, M., Durbin, E., and Buckley, L. 1998. RNA:DNA ratios as indicators of nutritional condition in the copepod Calanus finmarchicus. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 162: 173-181. doi:10.3354/meps162173.
50. Wagner, M.M., Campbell, R.G., Boudreau, C.A., and Durbin, E.G. 2001. Nucleic acids and growth of Calanus finmarchicus in the laboratory under different food and temperature conditions. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 221: 185-197. doi:10.3354/meps221185.
51. Weider, L.J., Elser, J.J., Crease, T.J., Mateos, M., Cotner, J.B., and Markow, J.B. 2005. The functional significance of ribosomal rDNA variation: impacts on the evolutionary ecology of organisms. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 36: 219-242. doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.36.102003.152620.
52. Wyngaard, G.A., Rasch, E.M., Manning, N.M., Gasser, K., and Domangue, R. 2005. The relationship between genome size, development rate, and body size in copepods. Hydrobiologia, 532: 123-137. doi:10.1007/s10750-004-9521-5.