Procedural explanations in mathematics writing: A framework for understanding college students' effective communication practices

Written Communication

Volumn 25, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 441-461

  Kline, Susan L ^a   Ishii, Drew K ^b  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b WHITTIER COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

Communication competence; Expository writing; Mathematical communication; Mathematical discourse; Procedural explanation; Written communication skill; Wxplanatory communication

Indexed keywords

EID: 51549091175     PISSN: 07410883     EISSN: 15528472     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0741088308322343     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Antaki, C. (1994). Explaining and arguing: The social organization of accounts. London: Sage.
2. Bangert-Drowns, R.L., Hurley, M.M., & Wilkinson, B. (2004). The effects of school-based writing-to-learn interventions on academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 29-58.
3. Bussi, M.G.B. (1998). Joint activity in mathematics classrooms: A Vygotskian analysis. In F. Seeger, J. Voigt, & U. Waschescio (Eds.), The culture of the mathematics classroom (pp. 13-49). New York: Cambridge University Press.
4. Cai, J., Jakabcsin, M.S., & Lane, S. (1996). Assessing students' mathematical communication. School Science and Mathematics, 96, 238-246.
5. Clark, D.J., Waywood, A., & Stephens, M. (1993). Probing the structure of mathematical writing. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 25, 235-250.
6. Cobb, P., Boufi, A., McClain, K., & Whitenack, J. (1997). Reflective discourse and collective reflection. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28, 258-277.
7. Cobb, P., Wood, T., & Yackel, E. (1993). Discourse, mathematical thinking, and classroom practice. In E. A. Forman, N. Minick, & C. A. Stone (Eds.), Contexts for learning: Sociocultural dynamics in children's development (pp. 91-119). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
8. Cobb, P., Yackel, E., & McClain, K. (Eds.). (2000). Symbolizing and communication in mathematics classrooms: Perspectives on discourse, tools, and instructional design. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
9. Ennis, R.H. (1969). Logic in teaching. Englewood Cliffs, NY: Prentice-Hall.
10. Johanning, D.I. (2000). An analysis of writing and postwriting group collaboration in middle school pre-algebra. School Science and Mathematics, 100, 151-160.
11. Leinhardt, G. (1987). Development of an expert explanation: An analysis of a sequence of subtraction lessons. Cognition and Instruction, 4, 225-282.
12. Lerman, S. (2000). The social turn in mathematics educational research. In J. Boaler (Ed.), Multiple perspectives on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 19-44). Westport, CT: Ablex.
13. Mayer, R.E., Bove, W., Bryman, A., Mars, R., & Tapangco, L. (1996). When less is more: Meaningful learning from visual and verbal summaries of science textbook lessons. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 64-73.
14. Mayer, R.E., & Sims, V.K. (1994). For whom is a picture worth a thousand words? Extensions of a dual-coding theory of multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 389-401.
15. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
16. Ochsner, R., & Fowler, J. (2004). Playing devil's advocate: Evaluating the literature of the WAC/WID movement. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 117-140.
17. O'Keefe, B.J., & Delia, J.G. (1986). Psychological and interactional dimensions of communicative development. In H. Giles & R. St. Clair (Eds.), Advances in language, communication, and social psychology (pp. 41-85). London: Lawrence Erlbaum.
18. O'Keefe, B.J., & Delia, J.G. (1988). Communication tasks and communication practices: The development of audience-centered message production. In B. A. Rafoth & D. L. Rubin (Eds.), The social construction of written communication (pp. 70-98). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
19. Pattow, D., & Wresch, W. (1998). Communicating technical information: A guide for the electronic age (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
20. Pirie, S. (1998). Crossing the gulf between thought and symbol: Language as (Slippery) stepping stones. In H. Steinbring, M. G. B. Bussi, & A. Sierpinska (Eds.), Language and communication in the mathematics classroom (pp. 7-29). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
21. Rowan, K.E. (1988). A contemporary theory of explanatory writing. Written Communication, 5, 23-56.
22. Rowan, K.E. (1990). Cognitive correlates of explanatory writing skill. Written Communication, 7, 316-341.
23. Rowan, K.E. (1999). Explanatory skills. In A. L. Vangelisti, J. A. Daly, & G. W. Friedrich (Eds.), Teaching communication: Theory, research, and methods (2nd ed., pp. 319-333). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
24. Rowan, K.E. (2003). Informing and explaining skills: Theory and research on informative communication. In J. O. Greene & B. R. Burleson (Eds.), The handbook of communication and social interaction skills (pp. 403-438). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
25. Rubin, D.L. (1988). Introduction: Four dimensions of social construction in written communication. In B. A. Rafoth & D. L. Rubin (Eds.), The social construction of written communication (pp. 1-33). Westport, CT: Ablex.
26. Saeki, M., & O' Keefe, B.J. (1994). Refusals and rejections: Designing messages to serve multiple goals. Human Communication Research, 21(1), 67-102.
27. Seeger, F., Voigt, J., & Waschescio, U. (Eds.). (1998). The culture of the mathematics classroom. New York: Cambridge University Press.
28. Sfard, A., & Kieran, C. (2001). Preparing teachers for handling students' mathematical communication: Gathering knowledge and building tools. In F. L. Lin & T. J. Cooney (Eds.), Making sense of mathematics teacher education (pp. 185-205). Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
29. Shield, M., & Galbraith, P. (1998). The analysis of student expository writing in mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 36, 29-52.
30. Steinbring, H., Bussi, M. B., & Sierpinska, A. (Eds.). (1998). Language and communication in the mathematics classroom. Reston, VA: NCTM.
31. Stevens, R., & Hall, R. (1998). Disciplined perception: Learning to see in technoscience. In M. Lampert & M. L. Blunk (Eds.), Talking mathematics in school: Studies of teaching and learning (pp. 107-149). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
32. Stonewater, J.K. (2002). The mathematics writer's checklist: The development of a preliminary assessment tool for writing in mathematics. School Science and Mathematics, 102, 324-334.
33. Swing, S., & Peterson, P. (1988). Elaborative and integrative thought processes in mathematics learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 54-66.
34. Tennyson, R.D., & Cocchiarella, M.J. (1986). An empirically based instructional design theory for teaching concepts. Review of Educational Psychology, 56, 40-71.
35. van Dormolen, J. (1985). Textual analysis. In B. Christianson, A. G. Howson, & M. Otte (Eds.), Perspectives on mathematics education (pp. 141-171). Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
36. van Zee, E.H., & Minstrell, J. (1997). Reflective discourse: Developing shared understandings in a physics classroom. International Journal of Science Education, 19, 209-228.
37. Voigt, J. (1998). The culture of the mathematics classroom: Negotiating the mathematical meaning of empirical phenomena. In F. Seeger, J. Voigt, & U. Waschescio (Eds.), The culture of the mathematics classroom (pp. 191-220). New York: Cambridge University Press.
38. Wells, G. (1999). Dialogic inquiry: Towards a sociocultural practice and theory of education. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
39. Wieringa, D., Moore, C., & Barnes, V. (1992). Procedure writing: Principles and practices. Columbus: Battelle Press.
40. Zupancic, J., & Ishii, D.K. (2002). Writing as a tool for learning in mathematics: A case study in eighth-grade algebra. Ohio Journal of School Mathematics, 46, 35-40.