Multimodal communication and spatial binding in pied currawongs (Strepera graculina)

Animal Cognition

Volumn 11, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 675-682

  Lombardo, Sarah R ^a   MacKey, Erica ^a   Tang, Laura ^a   Smith, Brian R ^a   Blumstein, Daniel T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Multimodal communication; Pied currawong; Spatial binding

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ANIMAL COMMUNICATION; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; BEHAVIOR; COGNITION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DEPTH PERCEPTION; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; RECOGNITION; SONGBIRD; SOUND DETECTION; TERRITORIALITY; VOCALIZATION;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ANIMAL COMMUNICATION; ANIMALS; COGNITION; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; PASSERIFORMES; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); SOUND LOCALIZATION; SPACE PERCEPTION; SPATIAL BEHAVIOR; TERRITORIALITY; VOCALIZATION, ANIMAL;

ANIMALIA; AVES; STREPERA GRACULINA;

EID: 51549087338     PISSN: 14359448     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10071-008-0158-z     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Alais D, Burr D (2004) The ventriloquist effect results from near-optimal bimodal integration. Curr Biol 14:257-262
2. Aydin A, Pearce JM (1997) Various determinants of response summation. Anim Learn Behav 25:108-121
3. Blumstein DT, Daniel JC, Evans CS (2006) JWatcher 1.0. http://www.jwatcher.ucla.edu
4. Chandler CR, Rose RK (1988) Comparative-analysis of the effects of visual and auditory stimuli on avian mobbing behavior. J Field Ornithol 59:269-277
5. Chantrey DF, Workman L (1984) Song and plumage effects on aggressive display by the European Robin Erithacus rubecula. Ibis 126:366-371
6. Charif RA, Mitchell S, Clark CW (1995) Canary 1.12 user's manual. Cornell Laboratory of Ornithology, Ithaca
7. Cherry EC (1953) Some experiments on the recognition of speech, with one and two ears. J Acoust Soc Am 25:975-979
8. Cohen DJ (1997) Visual detection and perceptual independence: assessing color and form. Percep Psychophys 59:623-635
9. Hankison SJ, Morris MR (2003) Avoiding a compromise between sexual selection and species recognition: female swordtail fish assess multiple species-specific cues. Behav Ecol 14:282-287
10. Horton H (2000) Australian birdsong collection. Australian Broadcasting Service, Sydney
11. Hoy R (2005) Animal awareness: the unbinding of multi-sensory cues in decision making by animals. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:2267-2268
12. Jack CE, Thurlow WR (1973) Effects of degree of visual association and angle of displacement on ventriloquism effect. Percept Motor Skill 37:967-979
13. Knight RL, Temple SA (1986) Nest-defense in the American goldfinch. Anim Behav 34:887-897
14. Marler P, Tenaza R (1977) Signaling behavior of apes with special reference to vocalization. In: Sebeok TA (ed) How animals communicate. Indiana University Press, Ontario, pp 965-1033
15. Martin P, Bateson P (1986) Measuring behavior: an introductory guide. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
16. Mathevon N, Aubin T (1997) Reaction to conspecific degraded song by the wren Troglodytes troglodytes: territorial response and choice of song post. Behav Process 39:77-84
17. McGurk H, MacDonald J (1976) Hearing lips and seeing voices. Nature 264:746-748
18. Movellan JR, McClelland JL (2001) The Morton-Massaro law of information integration: implications for models of perception. Psych Rev 108:113-148
19. Moulton CE, Brady RS, Belthoff JR (2004) Territory defense of nesting burrowing owls: responses to simulated conspecific intrusion. J Field Ornithol 75:288-295
20. Naguib M (1996) Auditory distance estimation in song birds: implications, methodologies and perspectives. Behav Process 38:163-168
21. Naguib M, Amrhein V, Kunc HP (2004) Effects of territorial intrusions on eavesdropping neighbors: communication networks in nightingales. Behav Ecol 15:1011-1015
22. Naguib M, Wiley RH (2001) Estimating the distance to a source of sound: mechanisms and adaptations for long-range communication. Anim Behav 62:825-837
23. Narins PM, Hodl W, Grabul DS (2003) Bimodal signal requisite for agonistic behavior in a dart-poison frog, Epipedobates femoralis. P Natl Acad Sci USA 100:577-580
24. Narins PM, Grabul DS, Soma KK, Gaucher P, Hodl W (2005) Cross-modal integration in a dart-poison frog. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:2425-2429
25. Nowicki S, Searcy WA, Krueger T, Hughes M (2002) Individual variation in response to simulated territorial challenge among territory-holding song sparrows. J Avian Biol 33:253-259
26. Partan S, Yelda S, Price V, Shimizu T (2005) Female pigeons, Columba livia, respond to multisensory audio/video playbacks of male courtship behaviour. Anim Behav 70:957-966
27. Partan SR, Marler P (2005) Issues in the classification of multimodal communication signals. Am Nat 166:231-245
28. Recher HF (1976) Reproductive behaviour of a pair of pied currawongs. Emu 76:224-226
29. Rovner JS, Barth FG (1981) Vibratory communication through living plants by a tropical wandering spider. Science 214:464-466
30. Rowe C (1999) Receiver psychology and the evolution of the multicomponent signals. Anim Behav 58:921-931
31. Rowe C, Guilford T (1999) Novelty effects in a multimodal warning signal. Anim Behav 57:341-346
32. Shalter MD (1978) Mobbing in the pied flycatcher effect of experiencing a live owl on responses to a stuffed facsimile. Z Tierpsychol 47:173-179
33. Slutsky DA, Recanzone GH (2001) Temporal and spatial dependency of the ventriloquism effect. Neuroreport 12:7-10
34. Spence C, Driver J (2004) Introductory comments. In: Spence C, Driver J (eds) Crossmodal space and crossmodal attention. Oxford University Press, New York, pp v-ix
35. SPSS, Inc. (2002) SPSS 11 for the Macintosh. SPSS Inc., Chicago
36. Stein BE, Stanford TR, Wallace MT, Vaughan JW, Jiang W (2004) Crossmodal spatial interaction in subcortical and cortical circuits. In: Spence C, Driver J (eds) Crossmodal space and crossmodal attention. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 25-50
37. Thurlow WR, Jack CE (1973) Certain determinants of ventriloquism effect. Percept Motor Skill 36:1171-1184
38. Wells KD (1978) Territoriality in the green frog (Rana clamitans): vocalizations and agnostic behavior. Anim Behav 26:1051-1063
39. van der Veer IT (2002) Seeing is believing: information about predators influences yellowhammer behaviour. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 51:466-471