L1 phonotactic knowledge and the L2 acquisition of alternations

Inquiries in Linguistic Development: In Honor of Lydia White

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 115-131

  Pater, Joe ^a   Tessier, Anne Michelle ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 51549085701     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1075/z.133     Document Type: Chapter

References (54)

1. Bakovic, E. (2004). All or Nothing: Partial Identity Avoidance as Cooperative Interaction. Ms., University of California, San Diego. Available at roa.rutgers.edu: ROA #671-0804.
2. Berko, J. (1958). The child's learning of English morphology. Word, 14, 150-177.
3. Bernhardt, B. & Stemberger, J. (1998). Handbook of phonological development: From the Perspective of constraint-based nonlinear phonology. San Diego: Academic Press.
4. Broselow, E., Chen, S.-I., & Wang, C. (1998). The Emergence of the Unmarked in Second Language Phonology. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20, 261-280.
5. Brown, C. (1998). The role of the L1 grammarin the L2 acquisition segmental structure. Second Language Research, 14, 136-193.
6. Bybee, J. & Newman, J. (1995). Are affixes more natural than stem changes? Linguistics, 33, 633-654.
7. Carpenter, A. (2005). Acquisition of a Natural vs. Unnatural Stress System. In A. Brugos, M. R. Clark-Cotton, & S. Ha (Eds.), Proceedings of the 29th annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 134-143). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla.
8. Cebrian, J. (2002). Phonetic Similarity, Syllabification and Phonotactic Constraints in the Acquisition ofa Second Language Contrast. Doctoral dissertation, University ofToronto.
9. Chomsky, N. & Halle, M. (1968). The Sound Pattern of English. New York:Harper and Row.
10. Crowhurt, M. (1994). Foot extrametricality and template mapping in Cupeño. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 12, 177-201.
11. Curtin, S., Goad, H., & Pater, J. (1998). Phonological transfer and levels of representation: The perceptual acquisition of Thai voice and aspiration by English and French speakers. Second Language Research, 14, 389-405.
12. Darcy, I. (2003). Assimilation Phonologique et Reconnaissance des Mots [Phonological Assimilation and Word Recognition]. Doctoral dissertation, Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales Paris and Johannes Gutenberg Universität Mainz.
13. Davidson, L. (to appear). Phonology, phonetics or frequency: Influences on the production of non-native sequences. To appear in Journal of Phonetics.
14. Dell, G. S., Reed, K. D., Adams, D. R., & Meyer, A. S. (2000). Speech errors, phonotactic constraints, and implicit learning: A study of the role of experience in language production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 1355-1367.
15. Derwing, B. L. & Baker, W. J. (1986). Assessing morphological development. In P. J. Fletcher & M.Garman(Eds.), Language acquisition: Studies in first language development (pp. 326-338). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16. Dupoux, E. & Peperkamp, S. (2002). Fossil markers of language development: phonological 'deafnesses' in adult speech processing. In J. Durand & B. Laks (Eds.), Phonetics, Phonology, and Cognition (pp. 168-190). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
17. Eckman, F. & Iverson, G. (1997). Structure preservation in interlanguage phonology. In S. J.
18. Esper, E. (1925). A Technique for the Experimental Investigation of Associative Interference in Artificial Language Material. Philadelphia: Linguistic Society of America.
19. Goldrick, M. (2002). Patterns in sound, patterns in mind: Phonological regularities in speech production. Doctoral dissertation, Johns Hopkins University.
20. Hayes, B. (1999). Phonological Restructuring in Yidiny and its Theoretical Consequences. In B. Hermans & M. van Oostendorp (Eds.), The Derivational Residue in Phonological Optimality Theory (pp. 175-205). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
21. Hayes, B. (2004). Phonological acquisition in Optimality Theory: The early stages. In R. Kager, J. Pater, & W. Zonneveld (Eds.), Constraints in Phonological Acquisition (pp. 153-208). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22. Itô, J. (1984). Melodic Dissimilation in Ainu. Linguistic Inquiry, 15, 505-513.
23. Kenstowicz, M. & Kisseberth, C. (1977). Topics in Phonological Theory. New York: Academic Press.
24. Kenstowicz, M. & Kisseberth, C. (1979). Generative Phonology .New York:AcademicPress.
25. Kraemer, M. (1998). A Correspondence Approach to vowel harmony and disharmony. SFB 282 working paper #107, Heinrich-Heine Universitaet-Duesseldorf.
26. Leather, J. & James, A. (1991). The acquisition of second language speech. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 13, 305-341.
27. Lombardi, L. (2003). Coronal epenthesis and markedness. Phonology, 19, 219-251.
28. MacWhinney, B. (1978). The acquisition of morphophonology. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development; 43, no 1.
29. Major, R. C. (1994). Current trends in interlanguage phonology. In M. Yavas (Ed.), First and second language phonology (pp. 181-204). San Diego: Singular Publishing.
30. McCarthy, J. (2002). A Thematic Guide to Optimality Theory.Cambridge,UK:Cambridge University Press.
31. McCarthy, J. & Prince, A. (1999). Faithfulness and identity in prosodic morphology. In H. van der Hulst, R. Kager, & W. Zonneveld (Eds.), The Prosody-Morphology Interface (pp. 218-309). Cambridge: CUP.
32. McCarthy, J. & Prince, A. (1993). Prosodic Morphology I: Constraint interaction and satisfaction. Technical report, Rutgers University Center for Cognitive Science. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University.
33. Moreton, E. (1999). Evidence for Phonotactic Grammar in Speech Perception. In Proceedings of the 14th Annual International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. San Francisco.
34. Morrison, G. (2005). Phonetic naturalness and phonological learnability. Paper presented at the 13th Manchester Phonology Meeting.
35. Odlin, T. (1989). Language transfer: cross-linguistic influence in language learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
36. Ota, M. (2001). Phonological theory and the development ofprosodic structure: Evidence from child Japanese. Annual Review of Language Acquisition, 1, 65-118.
37. Pater, J. (2003). The perceptual acquisition of Thai phonology by English speakers: Task and stimulus effects. Second Language Research, 19, 209-223.
38. Payne, D. (1981). The phonology and morphology of Axininca Campa.Dallas, TX:SIL Publications.
39. Pierrehumbert, J. (to appear). An unnatural process. In Proceedings of the Eighth Conference on Laboratory Phonology.
40. Prince, A. & Smolensky, P. (2004). Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar. Blackwell. [Originally published as Technical report, Rutgers University Center for Cognitive Science. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University, 1993.]
41. Prince, A. & Smolensky, P. (1993). Optimality Theory: Constraint interaction in generative grammar. Technical Report, Rutgers University and University of Colorado at Boulder, 1993. Revised version published by Blackwell 2004.
42. Prince, A. & Tesar, B. (2004). Learning Phonotactic Distributions. In R. Kager, J. Pater, & W. Zonneveld (Eds.), Constraints in Phonological Acquisition (pp. 245-291). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
43. Pycha, A., Nowak, P., Shin, E., & Shosted, R. (2003). Phonological Rule-Learning and Its Implications for a Theory of Vowel Harmony. In G. Garding & M. Tsujimura (Eds.), Proceedings of the 22nd West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (pp. 423-435). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
44. Rubach, J. (1984). Rule typology and phonological interference. In S. Elliason (Ed.), Theoretical issues in contrastive phonology (pp. 37-50). Heidelberg: Julius Groos Verlag.
45. Saffran, J. (2001). The use of predictive dependencies in language learning. Journal of Memory and Language, 44, 493-515.
46. Saffran, J., Newport, E., & Aslin, R. (1996). Word-segmentation: The role of distributional cues. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 606-621.
47. Schane, S., Tranel, B., & Lane, H. (1974). On the psychological reality of a natural rule of syllable structure. Cognition, 3, 351-358.
48. Schwartz, B. D. & Sprouse, R. A. (1996). L2 cognitive states and the Full Transfer/Full Access model. Second Language Research, 12, 40-72.
49. Seidl, A. & Buckley, E. (to appear). On the learning of arbitrary phonological rules. In Language Learning and Development.
50. Smolensky, P. (1996). The Initial State and "Richness of the Base" in Optimality Theory. Technical report, Department of Cognitive Science, Johns Hopkins University.
51. Stampe, D. (1969). The acquisition of phonemic representation. Proceedings of the Fifth Annual Chicago Linguistics Society, 433-444.
52. Tesar, B. & Prince, A. (2004). Using phonotactics to learn phonological alternations. In Proceedings of 39th Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, Vol. II: The panels. Chicago IL: Chicago Linguistic Society.
53. Wilson, C. (2003). Experimental Investigation of Phonological Naturalness. In G. Garding & M. Tsujimura (Eds.), Proceedings of the 22nd West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (pp. 533-546). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
54. Wilson, C. (2004). Asymmetric generalization of velar palatalization. Handout from colloquium at the University of California, Santa Barbara.