Porcine aortic valve interstitial cells in three-dimensional culture: Comparison of phenotype with aortic smooth muscle cells

Journal of Heart Valve Disease

Volumn 13, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 478-486

  Butcher, Jonathan T ^a   Nerem, Robert M ^a  

^a GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

A73025; COLLAGEN; CONTRACTILE PROTEIN; GLYCOSAMINOGLYCAN;

ANIMAL; AORTA VALVE; ARTICLE; CELL DIVISION; CONNECTIVE TISSUE CELL; CULTURE TECHNIQUE; CYTOLOGY; METABOLISM; PHENOTYPE; PHYSIOLOGY; SMOOTH MUSCLE FIBER; SWINE;

ANIMALS; AORTIC VALVE; CELL CULTURE TECHNIQUES; CELL DIVISION; COLLAGEN; CONNECTIVE TISSUE CELLS; CONTRACTILE PROTEINS; GLYCOSAMINOGLYCANS; MYOCYTES, SMOOTH MUSCLE; PHENOTYPE; SWINE;

EID: 5144233686     PISSN: 09668519     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (29)

1. Langley SM, McGuirk SP, Chaudhury MA, Livesey SA, Ross JK, Monro JL. Twenty-year follow-up of aortic valve replacement with antibiotic sterilized homografts in 200 patients. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1999;11:28-34
2. Hammermeister K, Sethi GK, Henderson WG, Grover FL, Oprian C, Rahimtoola SH. Outcomes 15 years after valve replacement with a mechanical versus a bioprosthetic valve: Final report of the Veterans Affairs randomized trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000;36:1152-1158
3. Lupinetti FM, Warner J, Jones TK, Herndon SP. Comparison of human tissues and mechanical prostheses for aortic valve replacement in children. Circulation 1997;96:321-325
4. Willems TP, Takkenberg JJ, Steyerberg EW, et al. Human tissue valves in the aortic position: Determinants of reoperation and valve regurgitation. Circulation 2001;103:1515-1521
5. Takkenberg JJ, van Herwerden LA, Eijkemans MJ, Bekkers JA, Bogers AJ. Evolution of allograft aortic valve replacement over 13 years: Results of 275 procedures. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2002;21:683-691;discussion 691
6. Turrentine MW, Ruzmetov M, Vijay P, Bills RG, Brown JW. Biological versus mechanical aortic valve replacement in children. Ann Thorac Surg 2001;71:S356-S360
7. Gross C, Klima U, Mair R, Brucke P. Aortic homo-grafts versus mechanical valves in aortic valve replacement in young patients: A retrospective study. Ann Thorac Surg 1998;66:S194-S197
8. David TE, Feindel CM, Scully HE, Bos J, Rakowski H. Aortic valve replacement with stentless porcine aortic valves: A ten-year experience. J Heart Valve Dis 1998;7:250-254
9. Affonso da Costa FD, Pinton R, Haggi Filho H, et al. The Ross procedure: Is it the ideal operation for the young with aortic valve disease? Heart Surg Forum 1998;1:116-124
10. Shinoka T. Tissue engineered heart valves: Autologous cell seeding on biodegradable polymer scaffold. Artif Organs 2002;26:402-406
11. Stock UA, Nagashima M, Khalil PN, et al. Tissue-engineered valved conduits in the pulmonary circulation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2000;119:732-740
12. Hoerstrup SP, Sodian R, Daebritz S, et al. Functional living trileaflet heart valves grown in vitro. Circulation 2000;102: III44-III49
13. Cebotari S, Mertsching H, Kallenbach K, et al. Construction of autologous human heart valves based on an acellular allograft matrix. Circulation 2002;106:163-168
14. Dumont K, Yperman J, Verbeken E, et al. Design of a new pulsatile bioreactor for tissue engineered aortic heart valve formation. Artif Organs 2002;26:710-714
15. Steinhoff G, Stock U, Karim N, et al. Tissue engineering of pulmonary heart valves on allogenic acellular matrix conduits: In vivo restoration of valve tissue. Circulation 2000;102:11150-11155
16. Dohmen PM, Lembcke A, Hotz H, Kivelitz D, Konertz WF. Ross operation with a tissue-engineered heart valve. Ann Thorac Surg 2002;74:1438-1442
17. Taylor PM, Batten P, Brand NJ, Thomas PS, Yacoub MH. The cardiac valve interstitial cell. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 2003;35:113-118
18. Mulholland DL, Gotlieb AI. Cell biology of valvular interstitial cells. Can J Cardiol 1996;12:231-236
19. Lester W, Rosenthal A, Granton B, Gotlieb AI. Porcine mitral valve interstitial cells in culture. Lab Invest 1988;59:710-719
20. Taylor PM, Allen SP, Yacoub MH. Phenotypic and functional characterization of interstitial cells from human heart valves, pericardium and skin. J Heart Valve Dis 2000;9:150-158
21. Messier RH, Jr., Bass BL, Aly HM, et al. Dual structural and functional phenorypes of the porcine aortic valve interstitial population: Characteristics of the leaflet myofibroblast. J Surg Res 1994;57:1-21
22. Stegemann JP, Nerem RM. Altered response of vascular smooth muscle cells to exogenous biochemical stimulation in two- and three-dimensional culture. Exp Cell Res 2003;283:146-155
23. Hinz B, Celetta G, Tomasek JJ, Gabbiani G, Chaponnier C. Alpha-smooth muscle actin expression upregulates fibroblast contractile activity. Mol Biol Cell 2001;12:2730-2741
24. Stegemann JP, Nerem RM. Phenotype modulation in vascular tissue engineering using biochemical and mechanical stimulation. Ann Biomed Eng 2003;31:391-402
25. Rasmussen H, Takuwa Y, Park S. Protein kinase C in the regulation of smooth muscle contraction. FASEB J 1987;1:177-185
26. Taylor PM, Allen SP, Dreger SA, Yacoub MH. Human cardiac valve interstitial cells in collagen sponge: A biological three-dimensional matrix for tissue engineering. J Heart Valve Dis 2002;11:298-306;discussion 306-307
27. Vogt PR, Stallmach T, Niederhauser U, et al. Explanted cryopreserved allografts: A morphological and immunohistochemical comparison between arterial allografts and allograft heart valves from infants and adults. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1999;15:639-644;discussion 644-645
28. Rabkin E, Hoerstrup SP, Aikawa M, Mayer JE, Jr., Schoen FJ. Evolution of cell phenotype and extracellular matrix in tissue-engineered heart valves during in-vitro maturation and in-vivo remodeling. J Heart Valve Dis 2002;11:308-314;discussion 314
29. Talman EA, Boughner DR. Internal shear properties of fresh porcine aortic valve cusps: Implications for normal valve function. J Heart Valve Dis 1996;5:152-159