Inference from plant competition experiments: The effect of spatial covariance

Oikos

Volumn 107, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 225-230

  Damgaard, Christian ^a  

^a DMU   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMMUNITY STRUCTURE; COMPETITION (ECOLOGY); EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; SPATIAL ANALYSIS;

ARABIDOPSIS; ARABIDOPSIS THALIANA;

EID: 5144223996     PISSN: 00301299     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0030-1299.2004.12341.x     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Aarssen, L. W. and Clauss, M. J. 1992. Genotypic variation in fecundity allocation in Arabidopsis thaliana. - J. Ecol. 80: 109-114.
2. Abbott, R. J. and Gomes, M. F. 1989. Population genetic structure and outcrossing rate of Arabidopsis thaliana. - Heredity 62: 411-418.
3. Antonovics, J. and Fowler, N. L. 1985. Analysis of frequency and density effects on growth in mixtures of Salvia splendens and Linum grandiflorum using hexagonal fan designs. - J. Ecol. 73: 219-234.
4. Bleasdale, J. K. A. and Nelder, J. A. 1960. Plant populations and crop yield. - Nature 188: 342.
5. Bolker, B. M. and Pacala, S. W. 1999. Spatial moment equations for plant competition: understanding spatial strategies and the advantages of short dispersal. - Am. Nat. 153: 575-602.
6. Christiansen, F. B. and Fenchel, T. M. 1977. Theories of populations in biological communities. - Springer-Verlag.
7. Clauss, M. J. and Aarssen, L. W. 1994. Phenotypic plasticity of size-fecundity relationships in Arabidopsis thaliana. - J. Ecol. 82: 447-455.
8. Coomes, D. A., Rees, M., Turnbull, L. et al. 2002. On the mechanisms of coexistence among annual-plant species, using neighbourhood techniques and simulation models. - Plant Ecol. 163: 23-38.
9. Cousens, R. 1991. Aspects of the design and interpretation of competition experiments. - Weed Technol. 5: 664-673.
10. Damgaard, C. 1998. Plant competition experiments: testing hypotheses and estimating the probability of coexistence. - Ecology 79: 1760-1767.
11. Damgaard, C. 2002. Quantifying the invasion probability of genetically modified plants. - BioSafety 7: Paper 1 (BY02001) Online Journal-URL: http://www.bioline.org.br/by.
12. Damgaard, C. in press. Modelling individual plant growth at a variable mean density or at a specific spatial setting. - Comptes rendus-Biologies.
13. Damgaard, C. and Jensen, B. D. 2002. Disease resistance in Arabidopsis thaliana increases the competitive ability and the predicted probability of long-term ecological success under disease pressure. - Oikos 98: 459-466.
14. de Wit, C. T. 1960. On competition. - Verslagen van Landbouwkundige Onderzoekingen. Vol. 66: 8.
15. Dieckmann, U., Law, R. and Metz, J. A. J. (eds) 2000. The geometry of ecological interactions: Simplifying spatial complexity. - Cambridge Univ. Press.
16. Ellison, A. M., Dixon, P. M. and Ngai, J. 1994. A null model for neighborhood models of plant competitive interactions. - Oikos 71: 225-238.
17. Firbank, L. G. and Watkinson, A. R. 1985. On the analysis of competition within two-species mixtures of plants. - J. Applied Ecology 22: 503-517.
18. Fortin, M.-J. and Gurevitch, J. 2001. Mantel tests. - In: Scheiner, S. M. and Gurevitch, J. (eds), Design and analysis of ecological experiments. Oxford Univ. Press.
19. Francis, M. G. and Pyke, D. A. 1996. Crested wheatgrass-cheatgrass seedling competition in a mixed-density design. - J. Range Manage. 49: 432-438.
20. Freckleton, R. P. and Watkinson, A. R. 2001. Non-manipulative determination of plant community dynamics. - Trends Ecol. Evol. 16: 301-307.
21. Law, R. and Watkinson, A. R. 1987. Response-surface analysis of two species competition: an experiment on Phleum arenarium and Vulpia fasciculata. - J. Ecol. 75: 871-886.
22. Marshall, D. R. and Jain, S. K. 1969. Interference in pure and mixed populations of Avena fatua and A. barbata. - J. Ecol. 57: 251-270.
23. Mead, R. 1967. A mathematical model for the estimation of inter-plant competition. - Biometrics 23: 189-205.
24. Miyashita, N. T., Kawabe, A. and Innan, H. 1999. DNA variation in the wild plant Arabidopsis thaliana revealed by amplified fragment length polymorphism analysis. - Genetics 152: 1723-1731.
25. Pacala, S. W. and Silander, J. A. 1987. Neighborhood interference among velvet leaf, Abutilon theophrasti, and pigweed, Amaranthus retroflexus. - Oikos 48: 217-224.
26. Pacala, S. W. and Silander, J. A. 1990. Field tests of neighborhood population dynamic models of two annual species. - Ecol. Monogr. 60: 113-134.
27. Rees, M., Grubb, P. J. and Kelly, D. 1996. Quantifying the impact of competition and spatial heterogeneity on the structure and dynamics of a four-species guild of winter annuals. - Am. Nat. 147: 1-32.
28. Shinozaki, K. and Kira, T. 1956. Intraspecific competition among higher plants. VII. Logistic theory of the C-D effect. - J. Inst. Polytech, Osaka City Univ. 7: 35-72.
29. Sletvold, N. and Hestmark, G. 1999. A comparative test of the predictive power of neighbourhood models in natural populations of Lasillia pustulata. - Can. J. Bot. 77: 1655-1661.
30. Soares, P. and Tomé, M. 1999. Distance-dependent competition measures for eucalyptus plantations in Portugal. - Ann. Forest Sci. 56: 307-319.
31. Stoll, P. and Prati, D. 2001. Intraspecific aggregation alters competitive interactions in experimental plant populations. - Ecology 82: 319-327.
32. Stoll, P. and Weiner, J. 2000. A neighborhood view of interactions among individual plants. - In: Dieckmann, U., Law, R. and Metz, J. A. J. (eds), The geometry of ecological interactions. Cambridge Univ. Press, pp. 11-27.
33. Turnbull, L. A., Coomes, D., Hector, A. et al. 2004. Seed mass and the competition/colonization trade-off: competitive interactions and spatial patterns in a guild of annual plants. - J. Ecol. 92: 97-109.
34. Wagner, R. G. and Radosevich, S. R. 1991. Neighborhood predictors of interspecific competition in young Douglas-fir plantations. - Can. J. Forest Res. 21: 821-828.
35. Watkinson, A. R., Freckleton, R. P. and Forrester, L. 2000. Population dynamics of Vulpia ciliata: regional, patch and local dynamics. - J. Ecol. 88: 1012-1029.