Modelling individual plant growth at a variable mean density or at a specific spatial setting

Comptes Rendus - Biologies

Volumn 327, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 255-260

  Damgaard, Christian ^a  

^a DMU   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Individual based modelling; Plant growth; Richards growth model; Size asymmetric competition

Indexed keywords

ASYMMETRIC COMPETITION; GROWTH MODELING; INDIVIDUAL-BASED MODEL; PLANT;

ARTICLE; BODY SIZE; COMPETITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; NONHUMAN; PLANT GROWTH; PLANT REPRODUCTION; POPULATION DENSITY; PUBLICATION; RESOURCE PARTITIONING; SUNLIGHT;

MATHEMATICS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PLANTS;

EID: 1842531068     PISSN: 16310691     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.crvi.2003.05.001     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Tilman D. Dynamics and Structure of Plant Communities 1988 Princeton University Press Princeton, NJ
2. Deutschman D.H. Levin S.A. Devine C. Buttel L.A. Scaling from trees to forests: analysis of a complex simulation model Science Online 277 1997 http://www.sciencemag.org/feature/data/deutschman/index.htm
3. Pacala S. Canham C. Saponara J. Silander J. Kobe R. Ribbens E. Forest models defined by field measurements: estimation, error analysis and dynamics Ecol. Monogr. 66 1996 1-44
4. Cernusca A. Tappeiner U. Bayfield N. (Eds.), Land-Use Changes in European Ecosystems: ECOMONT - Concepts and Results 1999 Blackwell Wissenshafts-Verlag Berlin
5. Seber G.A.F. Wild C.J. Nonlinear Regression 1989 Wiley New York
6. Richards F.J. A flexible growth function for empirical use J. Exp. Bot. 10 1959 290-300
7. Damgaard C. Weiner J. Nagashima H. Modelling individual growth and competition in plant populations: growth curves of Chenopodium album at two densities J. Ecol. 90 2002 666-671
8. Verhulst J.H. Notice sur la loi que la population suit dans son accroissement Correspondance Math. Phys. 10 1838 113-121
9. Weiner J. Asymmetric competition in plant populations Trends Ecol. Evol. 5 1990 360-364
10. Weiner J. Size hierarchies in experimental populations of annual plants Ecology 66 1985 743-752
11. Weiner J. Thomas S.C. Size variability and competition in plant monocultures Oikos 47 1986 211-222
12. Weiner J. How competition for light and nutrients affects size variability in Ipomoea tricolor populations Ecology 67 1986 1425-1427
13. Damgaard C. A test of asymmetric competition in plant monocultures using the maximum likelihood function of a simple growth model Ecol. Model. 116 1999 285-292
14. Schwinning S. Fox G.A. Population dynamic consequences of competitive symmetry in annual plants Oikos 72 1995 422-432
15. Wyszomirski T. Wyszomirska I. Jarzyna I. Simple mechanisms of size distributions dynamics in crowded and uncrowded virtual monocultures Ecol. Model. 115 1999 253-273
16. Schwinning S. Weiner J. Mechanisms determining the degree of size asymmetry in competition among plants Oecologia 113 1998 447-455
17. Law R. Watkinson A.R. Response-surface analysis of two species competition: an experiment on Phleum arenarium and Vulpia fasciculata. J. Ecol. 75 1987 871-886
18. Cousens R. Aspects of the design and interpretation of competition experiments Weed Technol. 5 1991 664-673
19. Shinozaki K. Kira T. Intraspecific competition among higher plants. VII. Logistic theory of the C-D effect J. Inst. Polytech., Osaka City University 7 1956 35-72
20. Damgaard C. Plant competition experiments: testing hypotheses and estimating the probability of coexistence Ecology 79 1998 1760-1767
21. Bleasdale J.K.A. Nelder J.A. Plant populations and crop yield Nature 188 1960 342
22. Mead R. Plant density and crop yield Appl. Stat. 19 1970 64-81
23. Watkinson A.R. Density-dependence in single species populations of plants J. Theor. Biol. 83 1980 345-357
24. Vandermeer J. Plant competition and the yield-density relationship J. Theor. Biol. 109 1984 393-399
25. Levin S.A. Pacala S.W. Theories of simplification and scaling of spatially distributed processes in: Tilman D. & Kareiva P. (Eds.), Spatial Ecology 1997 271-295 Princeton University Press Princeton, NJ
26. Durrett R. Levin S. The importance of being discrete (and spatial) Theor. Popul. Biol. 46 1994 363-394
27. Bolker B.M. Deutschman D.H. Hartvigsen G. Smith D.L. Individual-based modelling: what is the difference? Trends Ecol. Evol. 12 1997 111
28. Stoll P. Weiner J. A neighborhood view of interactions among individual plants in: Dieckmann U. Law R.& Metz J.A.J. (Eds.), The Geometry of Ecological Interactions 2000 11-27 Cambridge University Press Cambridge
29. Hara T. Wyszomirski T. Competitive asymmetry reduces spatial effects on size-structure dynamics in plant populations Ann. Bot. 73 1994 173-190
30. Gates D.J. Westcott M. Zone of influence models for competition in plantations Adv. Appl. Probab. 10 1978 299-537
31. Weiner J. Stoll P. Muller-Landau H. Jasentuliyana A. The effects of density, spatial pattern and competitive symmetry on size variation in simulated plant populations Am. Nat. 158 2001 438-450
32. Wyszomirski T. A simulation model of the growth of competing individuals of a plant population Ekol. Pol. 31 1983 73 92
33. Berger U. Hildenbrandt H. A new approach to spatially explicit modelling of forest dynamics: spacing, ageing and neighbourhood competition of mangrove trees Ecol. Model. 132 2000 287-302
34. Pacala S.W. Silander J.A. Neighbourhood models of plant population dynamics. I. Single species models of annuals Am. Nat. 125 1985 385-411
35. Coomes D.A. Rees M. Turnbull L. Ratcliffe S. On the mechanisms of coexistence among annual-plant species, using neighbourhood techniques and simulation models Plant Ecol. 163 2002 23-38
36. Pacala S.W. Silander J.A. Field tests of neighborhood population dynamic models of two annual species Ecol. Monogr. 60 1990 113-134
37. Sletvold N. Hestmark G. A comparative test of the predictive power of neighbourhood models in natural populations of Lasillia pustulata Can. J. Bot. 77 1999 1655-1661
38. Bolker B.M. Pacala S.W. Levin S.A. Moment methods for ecological processes in continuous space in: Dieckmann U. Law R. & Metz J.A.J. (Eds.), The Geometry of Ecological Interactions: Simplifying Spatial Complexity 2000 388-411 Cambridge University Press Cambridge
39. Dieckmann U. Law R. Metz J.A.J. (Eds.), The Geometry of Ecological Interactions: Simplifying Spatial Complexity 2000 Cambridge University Press Cambridge
40. Soares P. Tomé M. Distance-dependent competition measures for eucalyptus plantations in Portugal Ann. For. Sci. 56 1999 307-319