Rejoinder to Goldberg, Lee and Ashton (2008): Explaining counterintuitive findings

European Journal of Personality

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 157-162

  Anderson, Neil ^a   Ones, Deniz S ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

Organizational psychology; Personality scales and inventories; Tests

Indexed keywords

EID: 51349137577     PISSN: 08902070     EISSN: 10990984     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/per.669     Document Type: Note

References (7)

1. Anderson, N., & Ones, D. S. (2003). The construct validity of three entry level personality inventories used in the UK: Cautionary findings from a multiple-inventory investigation. European Journal of Personality, 17, S39-S66.
2. Anderson, N., & Ones, D. S. (2008). The construct validity of three entry level personality inventories used in the UK: A cautionary case study. Erratum and addendum. European Journal of Personality, 22, (this issue).
3. Dawes, R. M. (1971). A case study of graduate admissions: Application of three principles of human decision making. American Psychologist, 26, 180-188.
4. Dawes, R. M. (1975). Graduate admission variables and future success. Science, 187, 721-723.
5. Goldberg, L. R., Lee, K., & Ashton, M. C. (2008). Comment on Anderson and Ones (2008). European Journal of Personality, 22, (this issue). DOI: 10.1002/per.663
6. Ones, D. S., & Anderson, N. (2002). Gender and ethnic group differences on personality scales in selection: Some British data. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 75, 255-276.
7. Thorndike, R. L. (1949). Personnel selection; test and measurement techniques. Oxford, England: Wiley.