The effects of precedence on Navon-induced processing bias in face recognition

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

Volumn 61, Issue 10, 2008, Pages 1479-1486

  Perfect, Timothy J ^a   Weston, Nicola J ^a   Dennis, Ian ^a   Snell, Amelia ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PLYMOUTH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Face recognition; Featural processing; Global processing; Processing orientation

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; DECISION MAKING; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FACE; FEMALE; HUMAN; LEARNING; MALE; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PERCEPTION; RECEPTIVE FIELD;

ADOLESCENT; ATTENTION; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FACE; FEMALE; FIELD DEPENDENCE-INDEPENDENCE; HUMANS; MALE; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PRACTICE (PSYCHOLOGY); SIZE PERCEPTION; TRANSFER (PSYCHOLOGY); YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 51349120644     PISSN: 17470218     EISSN: 17470226     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17470210802034678     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Dodson, C. S., Johnson, M. K., & Schooler, J. W. (1997). The verbal overshadowing effect: Why descriptions impair face recognition. Memory & Cognition, 25, 129-139.
2. Dunning, D., & Stern, L. B. (1994). Distinguishing accurate from inaccurate eyewitness identifications via inquiries about decision processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 818-835.
3. Fallshore, M., & Schooler, J. W. (1995). Verbal vulnerability of perceptual expertise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 1608-1623.
4. Lawson, R. (2007). Local and global processing biases fail to influence face, object and word recognition. Visual Cognition, 15, 710-740.
5. Lewis, M. B. (2006). Eye-witnesses should not do cryptic crosswords prior to identity parades. Perception, 35, 1433-1436.
6. Macrae, C. N., & Lewis, H. L. (2002). Do I know you? Processing orientation and face recognition. Psychological Science, 13, 194-196.
7. Meissner, C. A. (2002). Applied aspects of the instructional bias effect in verbal overshadowing. Applied Conitive Psychology, 16, 911-928.
8. Michel, C., Rossion, B., Han, J., Churg, C.-S., & Caldara, R. (2006). Holistic processing is finely tuned for faces of one's own race. Psychological Science, 17, 608-615.
9. Navon, D. (1977). Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 353-383.
10. Parmentier, F., & Andres, P. (2003, September). Switch cost asymmetry: Effects of task dominance. Poster presented at the annual meeting of the European Society for Cognitive Psychology, Granada, Spain.
11. Perfect, T. J. (2003). Local processing bias impairs lineup performance. Psychological Reports, 93, 393-394.
12. Perfect, T. J., Dennis, I., & Snell, A. (2007). The effects of local and global processing bias on eyewitness identification performance. Memory, 15, 784-798.
13. Rhodes, G., Brake, S., Taylor, K., & Tan, S. (1989). Expertise and holistic coding in face recognition. British Journal of Psychology, 80, 313-331.
14. Schooler, J. W. (2002).Verbalization produces a transfer inappropriate processing shift. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 16, 989-998.
15. Schooler, J. W., & Engstler-Schooler, T. Y. (1990). Verbal overshadowing of visual memories: Some things are better left unsaid. Cognitive Psychology, 22, 36-71.
16. Tanaka, J. W., & Farah, M. J. (1993). Parts and wholes in face recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46A, 225-245.
17. Westerman, D. L., & Larsen, J. D. (1997). Verbal overshadowing effect: Evidence for a general shift in processing. The American Journal of Psychology, 110, 417-428.
18. Weston, N. J., & Perfect, T. J. (2005). The effects of processing bias on the composite effect. / precode> Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 12, 1038-1042.
19. Young, A. W., Hellawell, D., & Hay, D. C. (1987). Holistic information in face perception. Perception, 16, 747-759.