Mental budgeting versus marginal decision making: Training, experience and justification effects on decisions involving sunk costs

Journal of Behavioral Decision Making

Volumn 21, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 225-239

  Fennema, M G ^a,c   Perkins, Jon D ^b  

^a FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^c Accounting department

Author keywords

Justification; Mental budgeting; Sunk costs

Indexed keywords

EID: 51349102185     PISSN: 08943257     EISSN: 10990771     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bdm.585     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Anderson, J. (1982). Acquisition of cognitive skill. Psychological Review, 89, 369-406.
2. Anderson, J. (1987). Skill acquisition: Compilation of weak-method problem solutions. Psychological Review, 94, 192-210.
3. Anderson, J. (1995). Cognitive psychology and its implications (4th ed.) New York: W.H. Freeman and Company.
4. Arkes, H. R., & Blumer, C. (1985). The psychology of sunk cost. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 35, 124-140.
5. Bowen, M. G. (1987). The escalation phenomenon reconsidered: Decision dilemmas or decision errors? Academy of Management Review, 12, 52-66.
6. Chang, C. J., & Ho, J. L. Y. (2004). Judgment and decision making in project continuation: A study of students as surrogates for experienced managers. Abacus, 40, 94-116.
7. Conlon, E. J., & Parks, J. (1987). Information requests in the context of escalation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 344-350.
8. Garland, H. (1990). Throwing good money after bad: The effect of sunk costs on the decision to escalate commitment to an ongoing project. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 728-731.
9. Garland, H., & Newport, S. (1991). Effects of absolute and relative sunk costs on the decision to persist with a course of action. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 48, 55-69.
10. Garland, H., Sandefur, C. A., & Rogers, A. C. (1990). De-escalation of commitment in oil exploration: When sunk costs and negative feedback coincide. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 721-727.
11. Ghosh, D. (1997). De-escalation strategies: Some experimental evidence. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 9, 88-112.
12. Heath, C. (1995). Escalation and de-escalation of commitment in response to sunk costs: The role of budgeting in mental accounting. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 62, 38-54.
13. Horngren, C. T., Datar, S. M., & Foster, G. (2003). Cost accounting: A managerial emphasis (11th ed.) Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
14. Johnson, E. (1988). Expertise and decision under uncertainty. In M. Chi, R. Glaser, & M. Farr (Eds.), The nature of expertise (pp. 209-228). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
15. Johnson, V., & Kaplan, S. (1991). Experimental evidence on the effects of accountability on auditor judgments. Auditing:A Journal of Practice & Theory, 10, (Supplement), 96-107.
16. Johnstone, D. (2003). Behavioral and prescriptive explanations of a reverse sunk cost effect. Theory and Decision, 53, 209-242.
17. Koonce, L. (1992). Explanation and counterexplanation during audit analytical review. The Accounting Review, 67, 59-76.
18. Larrick, R. P., Morgan, J. N., & Nisbett, R. E. (1990). Teaching the use of cost-benefit reasoning in everyday life. Psychological Science, 1, 362-370.
19. Larrick, R. P., Nisbett, R. E., & Morgan, J. N. (1993). Who uses the cost-benefit rules of choice? Implications for the normative status of microeconomic theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 56, 331-347.
20. Lerner, J. S., & Tetlock, P. E. (1999). Accounting for the effects of accountability. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 255-275.
21. McCarthy, A. M., Schoorman, F. D., & Cooper, A. C. (1993). Reinvestment decisions by entrepreneurs: Rational decision making or escalation of commitment? Journal of Business Venturing, 8, 9-24.
22. Northcraft, G. B., & Neale, M. A. (1986). Opportunity costs and the framing of resource allocation decisions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 37, 348-356.
23. Northcraft, G. B., & Wolf, G. (1984). Dollars, sense, and sunk costs: A life-cycle model of resource allocation decisions. Academy of Management Review, 9, 225-234.
24. Peecher, M. E., & Kleinmuntz, D. N. (1991). Discussion of experimental evidence on the effects of accountability on auditor judgments. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 10, (Supplement), 108-113.
25. Shanteau, J., & Harrison, P. (1991). The perceived strength of an implied contract: Can it withstand financial temptation? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 49, 1-21.
26. Simonson, I., & Nye, P. (1992). The effect of accountability on susceptibility to decision errors. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 51, 416-446.
27. Staw, B. M. (1976). Knee-deep in the big muddy: A study of escalating commitment to a chosen course of action. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 16, 27-44.
28. Staw, B. M., & Hoang, H. (1995). Sunk costs in the NBA: Why draft order affects playing time and survival in professional basketball. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 474-494.
29. Tan, H., & Yates, J. F. (1995). Sunk cost effects: The influences of instruction and future return estimates. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 63, 311-319.
30. Tetlock, P. E. (1983). Accountability and complexity of thought. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 74-83.
31. Thaler, R. H. (1980). Toward a positive theory of consumer choice. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 1, 39-60.
32. Thaler, R. H. (1985). Mental accounting and consumer choice. Marketing Science, 4, 199-214. chairman of the Accounting department and Ernst & Young Professor at the Florida State