Inclusive governance? Civil society and the open method of co-ordination

Civil Society and Legitimate European Governance

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 42-67

  Armstrong, Kenneth A ^a  

^a QUEEN MARY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 51249122330     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (37)

1. Armstrong, K. (2002), 'Rediscovering Civil Society: The European Union and the White Paper on Governance', European Law Journal, 8 (1), 102-132.
2. Armstrong, K. (2003a), 'Tackling Social Exclusion Through OMC: Reshaping the Boundaries of EU Governance', in T. Börzel and R. Cichowski (eds) The State of the Union: Law, Politics and Society (Vol. 6), Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 170-194.
3. Armstrong, K. (2003b), 'United Kingdom - Divided on Sovereignty?', in N. Walker (ed.), Sovereignty in Transition, Oxford: Hart Publishing, pp. 327-350.
4. Ashenden, S. (1999), 'Questions of Criticism: Habermas and Foucault on Civil Society and Resistance', in S. Ashenden and D. Owen (eds), Foucault Contra Habermas, London: Sage, pp. 143-165.
5. Ashenden, S. and Owen, D (eds) (1999), Foucault Contra Habermas, London: Sage.
6. Bernard, N. (2003), 'A "New Governance" Approach to Economic, Social and Cultural Rights in the EU', in T. Hervey and J. Kenner (eds), Economic and Social Rights under the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights, Oxford: Hart Publishing, pp. 247-268.
7. Christodoulidis, E. (2003), 'Constitutional Irresolution: Law and the Framing of Civil Society', European Law Journal, 9 (4), 401-432.
8. Cohen, J. and Sabel, C. (1997), 'Directly-Deliberative Polyarchy', European Law Journal, 3 (4), 313-342.
9. Cohen, J. and Sabel, C. (2003), 'Sovereignty and Solidarity: EU and US' in D. Trubek and J. Zeitlin (eds), Governing Work and Welfare in a New Economy: European and American Experiments, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 345-375.
10. Curtin, D. (2003), 'Private Interest Representation or Civil Society Deliberation?: A Contemporary Dilemma for European Union Governance', Social and Legal Studies, 12 (1), 55-75.
11. European Commission (2001), European Governance: A White Paper, COM (2001) 428 final.
12. European Commission (2003), Strengthening the Social Dimension of the Lisbon Strategy: Streamlining Open Coordination in the Field of Social Protection, COM (2003) 261 final.
13. Ferrera, M., Matsaganis, M. and Sacchi, S. (2002), 'Open co-ordination against poverty: the new EU "Social Inclusion Process"', Journal of European Social Policy, 12 (3), 227-239.
14. Fine, R. and Smith, W. (2003), 'Jürgen Habermas's Theory of Cosmopolitanism', Constellations, 10 (4), 469-487.
15. Gerstenberg, O. (2002), 'Expanding the Constitution Beyond the Court: The Case of Euro-Constitutionalism', European Law Journal, 8 (1), 172-192.
16. Gerstenberg, O. and Sabel, C. (2002), 'Directly-Deliberative Polyarchy: An Institutional Ideal for Europe?', in C. Joerges and R. Dehousse (eds), Good Governance in Europe's Integrated Market, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 289-341.
17. Habermas, J. (1996), Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy, Cambridge: Polity Press.
18. Habermas, J. (2001), 'Why Europe Needs a Constitution', New Left Review, 11, 5-26.
19. Hodson, D and Maher, I. (2001), 'The Open Method as a New Mode of Governance: The Case of Soft Economic Policy Co-ordination', Journal of Common Market Studies, 39 (4), 719-746.
20. Majone, G. (1994), 'The Rise of the Regulatory State in Europe', West European Politics, 17 (3), 77-101.
21. Majone, G. (1996), Regulating Europe, London: Routledge.
22. Majone, G. (2000), 'The Credibility Crisis of Community Regulation', Journal of Common Market Studies, 38 (2), 273-302.
23. Michelman, F. (1999), Brennan and Democracy, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
24. Moravcsik, A. (2002), 'In Defence of the "Democratic Deficit": Reassessing Legitimacy in the European Union', Journal of Common Market Studies, 40 (4), 603-624.
25. Offe, C. (2000), 'Civil Society and Social Order: Demarcating and Combining Market, State and Economy', Archives Europénnes de Sociologie, 41 (1), 71-100.
26. de la Porte, C. (2002), 'Is the Open Method of Coordination Appropriate for Organizing Activities at European Level in Sensitive Policy Areas?', European Law Journal, 8 (1), 38-58.
27. de la Porte, C. and Pochet, P. (2002), Building Social Europe through the Open Method of Co-ordination, Brussels: P. I. E. Lang.
28. Regent, S. (2002), 'The Open Method of Co-ordination: A New Supranational Form of Governance', European Law Journal, 9 (2), 190-214.
29. Scharpf, F. (2002), 'The European Social Model: Coping with the Challenges of Diversity', Journal of Common Market Studies, 40 (4), 645-670.
30. Seligman, A. (2002), 'Civil Society as Idea and Ideal', in S. Chambers and W. Kymlicka (eds), Alternative Conceptions of Civil Society, Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 13-33.
31. Singh Grewal, S. (2001), 'The Paradox of Integration: Habermas and the Unfinished Project of European Union', Politics, 21 (2), 114-123.
32. Smismans, S. (2003), 'European Civil Society: Shaped by Discourses and Institutional Interests', European Law Journal, 9 (4), 473-495.
33. Trubek, D. and Mosher, J. (2003), 'New Governance, Employment Policy and the European Social Model', in D. Trubek and J. Zeitlin (eds), Governing Work and Welfare in a New Economy: European and American Experiments, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 33-58.
34. Tully, J. (1999), 'To Think and Act Differently: Foucault's Four Reciprocal Objections to Habermas' Theory' in S. Ashenden and D. Owen (eds), Foucault Contra Habermas, London: Sage, pp. 90-142.
35. Tully, J. (2002), 'The Unfreedom of the Moderns in Comparison to Their Ideals ofConstitutional Democracy', Modern Law Review, 65 (2), 204-228.
36. Wilkinson, M. (2003), 'Civil Society and the Re-imagination of European Constitutionalism', European Law Journal, 9 (4), 451-472.
37. Wincott, D. (2003), 'Beyond Social Regulation? New Instruments and/or a New Agenda for Social Policy at Lisbon?', Public Administration, 81 (3), 533-553.