Cognitive processes of students participating in engineering-focused design instruction

Journal of Technology Education

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 50-64

  Kelley, Todd R ^a  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 51249118510     PISSN: 10451064     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Atman, C. J. & Bursic, K.M. (1998). Verbal protocol analysis as a method to document engineering student design processes. Journal of Engineering Education, 87(2), 121-132.
2. Akin, O. (2001). Variant in design cognition. In C. Eastman, M. McCracken, & W. Newstetter (Eds.), Knowing and learning to design: Cognition in design education (pp.) Elsevier Science Press.
3. Ball, L. J., Ormerod, T. C., & Morley, N. J. (2004). Spontaneous analogizing in engineering design: A comparative analysis of expert and novices. Designing Studies, 25(5), 495-508.
4. Cross, N. (2004). Expertise in design: an overview. Design Studies, 25(5), 427-441.
5. Daugherty, M. K., (2005). A changing role for technology teacher education. Journal of Industrial Technology Education, 42(1), 41-58.
6. Douglas, J., Iversen, E., & Kalyandurg, C. (2004). Engineering in the K-12 classroom: An analysis of current practices and guidelines for the future. A production of the ASEE Engineering K12 Center.
7. Dym, C. L., Agogino, A. M., Eris, Ozgur,E., Frey, D. D., & Leifer, L. J. (2005). Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning. Journal of Engineering Education, 95(1),103-120.
8. Erekson, K. A. & Simon, H. A. (1993) Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data, MIT Press: Cambridge, MA.
9. Evans, J. St. B. T. (1995). Relevance and Reasoning. In S. E. Newstead, & J. St. B. T. Evans (Eds.) Perspectives on thinking and reasoning: Essays in honor of Peter Waton (pp. 147-172). Howe, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Ltd.
10. Flowers, J. (1998). Problem solving in technology education: A taoist perspective. Journal of Technology Education, 10(1), 20-26.
11. Foster, P. N. (1994). Technology education: AKA industrial arts. Journal of Technology Education, 5(2), 15-30.
12. Hailey, C. E., Erickson, T., Becker, K., & Thomas, T. (2005). National center for engineering and technology education. The Technology Teacher, 64(5), 23-26.
13. Halfin, H. H. (1973). Technology: A process approach. (Doctoral dissertation, West Virgina University, 1973) Dissertation Abstracts International, 11(1) 1111A.
14. Hill, R. B. (1997). The design of an instrument to assess problem solving activities in technology education. Journal of Technology Education, 9(1), 31-46.
15. International Technology Education Association. (2000). Standards for technological literacy: Content for the study of technology. Reston, VA: Author.
16. Johnson, S. D. (1992). A framework for technology education curricula which emphasizes intellectual processes. Journal of Technology Education, 3(2), 26-36.
17. Jonassen, D. H. (2000). Toward a design theory of problem solving. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(4), 63-85.
18. Koen, B. V. (2003). Discussion of the method: Conducting the engineer's approach to problem solving. New York: Oxford University Press.
19. Kruger, C., Cross, N. (2001) Modeling cognitive strategies in creative design. In J. Gero & M. Maher (Eds.), Computational and cognitive models of creative design V. (pp.). University of Sidney, Australia.
20. Laeser, M., Moskal, B. M., Knecht, R. & Lasich, D. (2003). Engineering design: Examining the impact of gender and the team gender composition. Journal of Engineering Education, 92(1), 49-56.
21. Lewis, T. (1999). Research in technology education-some areas of need. Journal of Technology Education, 10(2), 41-56.
22. Lewis, T. (2004). A turn to engineering: The continuing struggle of technology education for legitimatization as a school subject. Journal of Technology Education, 16(1), 21-39.
23. Lewis,T. (2005). Coming to terms with engineering design as content. Journal of Technology Education, 16(2), 37-54 Lubart, T.I (2000-2001).
24. McVearry, R. D. (2003, April). High-tech high schools build bridges to college. Engineering Times. Alexandria, VA: National Society of Professional Engineers. Retrieved December 2, 2006 from http://www.nspe.org.
25. Plaza, O. (2004). Technology education versus liberal arts education? Journal of Technology Studies, 30(1), 16-18.
26. Project Lead The Way - Sample curriculum (2006). Retrieved May 24, 2007, from http://www.pltw.org/curriculum/sample-curriculum.html
27. Roberts, P. (1994). The place of design in technology education. In D. Layton (Ed.) Innovations in science and technology education: Vol. 5, 171-179. Paris: UNESCO.
28. SchÖn, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner, Basic Books: New York,
29. van Someren, B., van de Velde, W., & Sandberg, J. (1994). The think aloud method: A practical guide to modeling cognitive processes. Academic Press: London, UK.
30. Welch, M. (1999). Analyzing the tacit strategies of novice designers. Research in Science & Technical Education, 17(1) 19-34.
31. Welch, M. & Lim, H. (2000). The strategic thinking of novice designers discontinuity between theory and practice. Journal of Technology Studies, 26(2) 34-44.
32. Wicklein, R. C. (2006). Five good reason for engineering design as the focus for technology education. The Technology Teacher, 65(7), 25-29.