On quantifying tolerance of herbivory for comparative analyses

Evolution

Volumn 62, Issue 9, 2008, Pages 2429-2434

  Wise, Michael J ^a   Carr, David E ^b  

^a BUCKNELL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA   (United States)

Author keywords

G x E; Logarithmic transformation; Norm of reaction; Plasticity; Tolerance of herbivory

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DAMAGE; DATA SET; HERBIVORY; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; PHENOTYPIC PLASTICITY; PLANT; REACTION NORM; TOLERANCE;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; ECOLOGY; FOOD CHAIN; GENETICS; GENOTYPE; METHODOLOGY; PLANT;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ECOLOGY; FOOD CHAIN; GENOTYPE; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PLANTS;

EID: 51249089947     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: 15585646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00458.x     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Abrahamson, W. G., and A. E. Weis. 1997. Evolutionary ecology across three trophic levels: goldenrods, gallmakers, and natural enemies. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ.
2. Agrawal, A. A., S. Y. Strauss, and M. J. Stout. 1999. Costs of induced responses and tolerance to herbivory in male and female fitness components of wild radish. Evolution 53 : 1093 1104.
3. Fineblum, W. L., and M. D. Rausher. 1995. Tradeoff between resistance and tolerance to herbivore damage in a morning glory. Nature 377 : 517 520.
4. Fornoni, J., J. Núñez-Farfán, and P. L. Valverde. 2003a. Evolutionary ecology of tolerance to herbivory: advances and perspectives. Comments Theor. Biol. 8 : 643 663.
5. Fornoni, J., P. L. Valverde, and J. Núñez-Farfán. 2003b. Quantitative genetics of plant tolerance and resistance against natural enemies of two natural populations of Datura stramonium. Evol. Ecol. Res. 5 : 1049 1065.
6. Hawkes, C. V., and J. J. Sullivan. 2001. The impact of herbivory on plants in different resource conditions: a meta-analysis. Ecology 82 : 2045 2058.
7. Hochwender, C. G., R. J. Marquis, and K. A. Stowe. 2000. The potential for and constraints on the evolution of compensatory ability in Asclepias syriaca. Oecologia 122 : 361 370.
8. Johnston, M. O., and D. J. Schoen. 1994. On the measurement of inbreeding depression. Evolution 48 : 1735 1741.
9. Mauricio, R., M. D. Rausher, and D. S. Burdick. 1997. Variation in the defense strategies of plants: are resistance and tolerance mutually exclusive Ecology 78 : 1301 1311.
10. Meyer, G. A. 1993. A comparison of the impacts of leaf- and sap-feeding insects on growth and allocation of goldenrod. Ecology 74 : 1101 1116.
11. Olejnik, S. F., and J. Algina. 1987. Type I error rates and power estimates of selected parametric and nonparametric tests of scale. J. Edu. Stat. 12 : 45 61.
12. Paige, K. N. 1999. Regrowth following ungulate herbivory in Ipomopsis aggregata: geographic evidence for overcompensation. Oecologia 118 : 316 323.
13. Painter, R. H. 1958. Resistance of plants to insects. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 3 : 267 290.
14. Rosenthal, J. P., and S. C. Welter. 1995. Tolerance to herbivory by a stemboring caterpillar in architecturally distinct maizes and wild relatives. Oecologia 102 : 146 155.
15. Shen, C. S., and C. E. Bach. 1997. Genetic variation in resistance and tolerance to insect herbivory in Salix cordata. Ecol. Entomol. 22 : 335 342.
16. Simms, E. L., and J. Triplett. 1994. Costs and benefits of plant responses to disease: resistance and tolerance. Evolution 48 : 1973 1985.
17. Stanton, M. L., and D. A. Thiede. 2005. Statistical convenience vs biological insight: consequences of data transformation for the analysis of fitness variation in hetereogeneous environments. New Phytol. 166 : 319 338.
18. Stinchcombe, J. R., and M. D. Rausher. 2001. Diffuse selection on resistance to deer herbivory in the ivyleaf morning glory, Ipomoea hederacea. Am.Nat. 158 : 376 388.
19. Stinchcombe, J. R., and M. D. Rausher. 2002. The evolution of tolerance to deer herbivory: modifications caused by the abundance of insect herbivores. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 269 : 1241 1246.
20. Stowe, K. A. 1998. Experimental evolution of resistance in Brassica rapa: correlated response of tolerance in lines selected for glucosinolate content. Evolution 52 : 703 712.
21. Stowe, K. A., R. J. Marquis, C. G. Hochwender, and E. L. Simms. 2000. The evolutionary ecology of tolerance to consumer damage. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 31 : 565 595.
22. Strauss, S. Y., and A. A. Agrawal. 1999. The ecology and evolution of plant tolerance to herbivory. Trends Ecol. Evol. 14 : 179 185.
23. Strauss, S. Y., W. Watson, and M. T. Allen. 2003. Predictors of male and female tolerance to insect herbivory in Raphanus raphanistrum. Ecology 84 : 2074 2082.
24. Tiffin, P., and M. D. Rausher. 1999. Genetic constraints and selection acting on tolerance to herbivory in the common morning glory Ipomoea purpurea. Am. Nat. 154 : 700 716.
25. Van Der Meijden, E., M. Wijn, and H. J. Verkaar. 1988. Defence and regrowth, alternative plant strategies in the struggle against herbivores. Oikos 51 : 355 363.
26. Welter, S. C., and J. W. Steggall. 1993. Contrasting the tolerance of wild and domesticated tomatoes to herbivory: agroecological implications. Ecol. Appl. 3 : 271 278.
27. Wise, M. J., and W. G. Abrahamson. 2005. Beyond the compensatory continuum: environmental resource levels and plant tolerance of herbivory. Oikos 109 : 417 428.
28. Wise, M. J., and W. G. Abrahamson. 2007. Effects of resource availability on tolerance of herbivory: a review and assessment of three opposing models. Am. Nat. 169 : 443 454.