Impact of date stamping on patient safety measurement in patients undergoing CABG: Experience with the AHRQ Patient Safety Indicators

BMC Health Services Research

Volumn 8, Issue , 2008, Pages

  Glance, Laurent G ^a   Li, Yue ^b   Osler, Turner M ^c   Mukamel, Dana B ^d   Dick, Andrew W ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AND DENTISTRY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^e RAND CORPORATION   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGENCY FOR HEALTHCARE RESEARCH AND QUALITY; ARTICLE; COHORT ANALYSIS; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; DECUBITUS; DEEP VEIN THROMBOSIS; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HOSPITAL ADMISSION; HUMAN; LUNG EMBOLISM; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEDICAL INFORMATION; PATIENT SAFETY; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; PREDICTIVE VALIDITY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK ASSESSMENT; UNITED STATES; GOVERNMENT; MEDICAL ERROR; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; SAFETY; STANDARD; STATISTICS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

CALIFORNIA; COHORT STUDIES; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS; HUMANS; MEDICAL ERRORS; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; QUALITY INDICATORS, HEALTH CARE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK ADJUSTMENT; SAFETY MANAGEMENT; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED STATES; UNITED STATES AGENCY FOR HEALTHCARE RESEARCH AND QUALITY;

EID: 51249084106     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14726963     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-8-176     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. To Err is Human: Building a Safer Health System Washington, D.C., National Academy Press, Kohn LT, Corrigan JM and Donaldson MS, 2000
2. Accidental deaths, saved lives, and improved quality. TA Brennan A Gawande E Thomas D Studdert, N Engl J Med 2005 353 1405 1409 10.1056/NEJMsb051157 16192489
3. Institute of Medicine, Performance Measurement: Accelerating Improvement Washington, D.C., National Academies Press 2007 http://www.nap.edu
4. The quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States. EA McGlynn SM Asch J Adams J Keesey J Hicks A DeCristofaro EA Kerr, N Engl J Med 2003 348 2635 2645 10.1056/NEJMsa022615 12826639
5. Crossing the Quality Chasm. Washington, D.C., National Academy Press 2001
6. Guide to Patient Safety Indicators. 2006 http://www.qualityindicators. ahrq.gov
7. Human error: models and management. J Reason, BMJ 2000 320 768 770 10720363 10.1136/bmj.320.7237.768
8. Evaluation of the Use of AHRQ and Other Quality Indicators. PS Hussey S Mattke L Morse S Ridgely, AHRQ 2006 http://www.qualityindicators.ahrq.gov/ downloads/publications/AHRQQIsEvaluationFinalReport.pdf
9. Assessing quality using administrative data. LI Iezzoni, Ann Intern Med 1997 127 666 674 9382378
10. Does clinical evidence support ICD-9-CM diagnosis coding of complications? EP McCarthy LI Iezzoni RB Davis RH Palmer M Cahalane MB Hamel K Mukamal RS Phillips DT Davies Jr., Med Care 2000 38 868 876 10.1097/00005650- 200008000-00010 10929998
11. Can administrative data be used to ascertain clinically significant postoperative complications? 3. PS Romano ME Schembri JA Rainwater, Am J Med Qual 2002 17 145 154 10.1177/106286060201700404 12153067
12. Identification of in-hospital complications from claims data. Is it valid? AG Lawthers EP McCarthy RB Davis LE Peterson RH Palmer LI Iezzoni, Med Care 2000 38 785 795 10.1097/00005650-200008000-00003 10929991
13. Patient Safety Indicators: using administrative data to identify potential patient safety concerns. MR Miller A Elixhauser C Zhan GS Meyer, Health Serv Res 2001 36 110 132 16148964
14. AHRQ Quality Indicatdors: Patient Safety Indicators. Technical Specifications. 2007 http://www.qualityindicators.ahrq.gov/psi_download.htm
15. Impact of diagnosis-timing indicators on measures of safety, comorbidity, and case mix groupings from administrative data sources. JM Naessens CR Campbell B Berg AR Williams R Culbertson, Med Care 2007 45 781 788 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3180618b7f 17667313
16. How Often are Potential Patient Safety Events Present on Admission? RL Houchens A Elixhauser PS Romano, Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2008 34 3 154 163 18419045
17. Accuracy of hospital report cards based on administrative data. LG Glance AW Dick TM Osler DB Mukamel, Health Serv Res 2006 41 1413 1437 16899015 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00419.x
18. Impact of the present-on-admission indicator on hospital quality measurement: experience with the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Inpatient Quality Indicators. LG Glance TM Osler DB Mukamel AW Dick, Med Care 2008 46 112 119 18219238
19. The Case for the Present-on-Admission (POA) Indicator. R Coffey M Milenkovic RM Andrews, U.S. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality 2006 http://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/methods.jsp
20. Enhancement of claims data to improve risk adjustment of hospital mortality. M Pine HS Jordan A Elixhauser DE Fry DC Hoaglin B Jones R Meimban D Warner J Gonzales, JAMA 2007 297 71 76 10.1001/jama.297.1.71 17200477
21. Identifying Potentially Preventable Complications Using a Present on Admission Indicator. JS Hughes RF Averill NI Goldfield JC Gay J Muldoon E McCullough J Xiang, Health Care Financ Rev 2006 27 63 82 17290649
22. Does date stamping ICD-9-CM codes increase the value of clinical information in administrative data? LG Glance AW Dick TM Osler DB Mukamel, Health Serv Res 2006 41 231 251 16430609 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00419.x
23. Administrative Versus Clinical Data for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Report Cards: The View From California. JP Parker Z Li CL Damberg B Danielsen DM Carlisle, Med Care 2006 44 687 695 10.1097/01.mlr.0000215815.70506. b6 16799364
24. Identifying complications of care using administrative data. LI Iezzoni J Daley T Heeren SM Foley ES Fisher C Duncan JS Hughes GA Coffman, Med Care 1994 32 700 715 10.1097/00005650-199407000-00004 8028405
25. The Rand/UCLA Appropriateness Method User's Manual. K Fitch J Bernstein BB Aguilar MD JR LaCalle P Lazario, RAND 2001
26. Evaluating the patient safety indicators: how well do they perform on Veterans Health Administration data? AK Rosen P Rivard S Zhao S Loveland D Tsilimingras CL Christiansen A Elixhauser PS Romano, Med Care 2005 43 873 884 10.1097/01.mlr.0000173561.79742.fb 16116352
27. Comorbidity measures for use with administrative data. A Elixhauser C Steiner DR Harris RM Coffey, Med Care 1998 36 8 27 10.1097/00005650-199801000- 00004 9431328
28. Reliability of Measurement. JL Fleiss, Design and Analysis of Clinical Experiments. New York, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 1999 1 31
29. Enhancing patient safety through organizational learning: Are patient safety indicators a step in the right direction? PE Rivard AK Rosen JS Carroll, Health Serv Res 2006 41 1633 1653 16898983 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00569.x
30. A national profile of patient safety in U.S. hospitals. PS Romano JJ Geppert S Davies MR Miller A Elixhauser KM McDonald, Health Aff (Millwood ) 2003 22 154 166 10.1377/hlthaff.22.2.154 12674418
31. Promoting patient safety by preventing medical error. LL Leape DD Woods MJ Hatlie KW Kizer SA Schroeder GD Lundberg, JAMA 1998 280 1444 1447 10.1001/jama.280.16.1444 9801008
32. What practices will most improve safety? Evidence-based medicine meets patient safety. LL Leape DM Berwick DW Bates, JAMA 2002 288 501 507 10.1001/jama.288.4.501 12132984
33. Assessing patient safety in the United States: challenges and opportunities. C Zhan E Kelley HP Yang M Keyes J Battles RJ Borotkanics D Stryer, Med Care 2005 43 I42 I47 10.1097/00005650-200503001-00007 15746590
34. The risks of risk adjustment. LI Iezzoni, JAMA 1997 278 1600 1607 10.1001/jama.278.19.1600 9370507
35. Use and misuse of process and outcome data in managing performance of acute medical care: avoiding institutional stigma 1. R Lilford MA Mohammed D Spiegelhalter R Thomson, Lancet 2004 363 1147 1154 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)15901-1 15064036
36. Improving the outcomes of coronary artery bypass surgery in New York State. EL Hannan H Kilburn Jr. M Racz E Shields MR Chassin, JAMA 1994 271 761 766 10.1001/jama.271.10.761 8114213
37. A regional prospective study of in-hospital mortality associated with coronary artery bypass grafting. The Northern New England Cardiovascular Disease Study Group. GT O'Connor SK Plume EM Olmstead LH Coffin JR Morton CT Maloney ER Nowicki JF Tryzelaar F Hernandez L Adrian, JAMA 1991 266 803 809 10.1001/jama.266.6.803 1907669
38. The Department of Veterans Affairs' NSQIP: the first national, validated, outcome-based, risk-adjusted, and peer-controlled program for the measurement and enhancement of the quality of surgical care. National VA Surgical Quality Improvement Program. SF Khuri J Daley W Henderson K Hur J Demakis JB Aust V Chong PJ Fabri JO Gibbs F Grover K Hammermeister G Irvin III G McDonald E Passaro Jr. L Phillips F Scamman J Spencer JF Stremple, Ann Surg 1998 228 491 507 9790339 10.1097/00000658-199810000-00006
39. Pay for performance in commercial HMOs. MB Rosenthal BE Landon SL Normand RG Frank AM Epstein, N Engl J Med 2006 355 1895 1902 10.1056/NEJMsa063682 17079763
40. Deficit Reduction Act of 2005. 2005 http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/70xx/ doc7028/s1932conf.pdf S.1932 Section 5001 Public Law No. 109-171
41. Pay for Performance at the Tipping Point. AM Epstein, N Engl J Med 2007
42. Public Reporting and Pay for Performance in Hospital Quality Improvement. PK Lindenauer D Remus S Roman MB Rothberg EM Benjamin A Ma DW Bratzler, N Engl J Med 2007
43. Relationship between Medicare's hospital compare performance measures and mortality rates. RM Werner ET Bradlow, JAMA 2006 296 2694 2702 10.1001/jama.296.22.2694 17164455