A comparison of structural equation modeling approaches: The case of user acceptance of information systems

Journal of Computer Information Systems

Volumn 48, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 106-114

  Dow, Kevin E ^a   Jackson, Cynthia ^b   Wong, Jeffrey ^c   Leitch, Robert A ^d  

^a KENT STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

Accounting information systems; Covariance structure analysis; Parceling; Path analysis; Structural equation modeling; Technology acceptance model

Indexed keywords

ACCOUNTING INFORMATION SYSTEMS; COVARIANCE STRUCTURE ANALYSIS; PARCELING; PATH ANALYSIS; STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING; TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE MODEL;

REGRESSION ANALYSIS; RESEARCH;

INFORMATION SYSTEMS;

EID: 51049097635     PISSN: 08874417     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Adams, D.A., Nelson, R.R., and Todd, P.A., "Perceived Usefulness, Ease of Use, and Usage of Information Technology: A Replication," MIS Quarterly, 16:2, 1992, pp. 227-247.
2. Bandalos, D.L. and Finney, S.J., "Item parceling issues in structural equation modeling," in G. A. Marcoulides and R. E. Schumacker, ed., New developments and techniques in structural equation modeling, Manwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., 2001, pp. 269-296.
3. Bansal, H.S., Irving, P.O., and Taylor, S.F., "A three-component model of customer commitment to service providers," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 32:3, 2004, pp. 234-250.
4. Barki, H. and Hartwick, J., "Rethinking the Concept of User Involvement," MIS Quarterly, 13:1, 1989, pp. 53-63.
5. Benamati, J. and Rajkumar, T.M., "The application development outsourcing decision: An application of the technology acceptance model," Journal of Computer Information Systems, 42:4, 2002, pp. 35-43.
6. Dishaw, M. and Strong, D., "Extending the technology acceptance model with task-technology fit constructs," Information and Management, 36:1, 1999, pp. 9-21.
7. Hartwick, J. and Barki, H., "Explaining the role of user participation in information system use," Management Science, 40:4, 1994, pp.
8. Hu, P., Chau, P.Y.K., Sheng, S., and Tam, K.Y., "Examining the Technology Acceptance Model using physician acceptance of telemedicine technology," Journal of Management Information Systems, 16:2, 1999, pp. 91-112.
9. Igbaria, M., Guimaraes, T., and Davis, G.B., "Testing the determinants of microcomputer usage via a structural equation model," Journal of Management Information Systems, 11:4, 1995, pp. 87-114.
10. Ives, B. and Olson, M.H., "User involvement and MIS success: A review of research," Management Science, 30:5, 1984, pp. 586-603.
11. Jackson, C.M., Chow, S., and Leitch, R.A., "Toward an understanding of the behavioral intention to use an information system," Decision Sciences, 28:2, 1997, pp. 357-389.
12. Jones, E.E. and Davis, K., "From acts to dispositions: The attribution process in person perception," in Leonard Berkowitz, ed., Advances in experimental social psychology, Vol. 2, New York: Academic Press, 1965, pp. 219-266.
13. Kline, R.B., Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling, Montreal: Concordia University, 1998.
14. Korzaan, M.L., "Going with the flow: Predicting online purchase intentions," Journal of Computer Information Systems, 43:4, 2003, pp. 25-31.
15. Lee, B., Barua, A., and Whinston, A.B., "Discovery and representation of casual relationships in MIS research: A methodological framework," MIS Quarterly, 21:1, 1997, pp. 109-136.
16. Little, T.D., Cunningham, W.A., and Shahar, G., "To Parcel or Not to Parcel: Exploring the Question, Weighing the Merits," Structural Equation Modeling, 9:2, 2002, pp. 151-173.
17. Marcoulides, G.A. and Schumacker, R.E., Advanced Structural Equation Modeling: Issues and Techniques, NJ: Erlbaum, 1996.
18. Mardia, K.V., "Measures of multivariate skewness and kurtosis with applications," British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 28, 1970, pp. 205-214.
19. McCloskey, D., "Evaluating electronic commerce acceptance with the technology acceptance model," Journal of Computer Information Systems, 44:2, 2003/2004, pp. 49-57.
20. O'Loughlin, C. and Coenders, G., "Estimation of the European customer satisfaction index: Maximum likelihood versus partial least squares: Application to postal services," Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 15:9-10, 2004, pp. 1231-1255.
21. Sethi, V. and King, W.R., "Construct Measurement in Information Systems Research: An Illustration in Strategic Systems," Decision Sciences, 22:3, 1991, pp. 455-472.
22. Takahashi, T. and Nasser, F., "The impact of using item parcels on ad hoc goodness of fit indices in confirmatory factor analysis: An empirical example," in Proceedings of Annual Meetings of the American Educational Research Association, 1996.
23. Venkatesh, V. and Davis, F.D., "Modeling the determinants of perceived ease of use," Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS), 1994, pp. 213-227.
24. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M., Davis, G.B., and Davis, F.D., "User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view," MIS Quarterly, 27:3, 2003, pp. 425-478.
25. Wu, J.-T.B. and Marakas, G., "The impact of operational user participation on perceived system implementation success: An empirical investigation," Journal of Computer Information Systems, 47:Special Issue, 2006, pp. 127-140.