Cortical neural activity underlying speech perception in postlingual adult cochlear implant recipients

Audiology and Neurotology

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 39-53

  Henkin, Yael ^a,b   Tetin Schneider, Simona ^a,b   Hildesheimer, Minka ^a,b   Kishon Rabin, Liat ^a  

^a TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

^b SHEBA MEDICAL CENTER   (Israel)

Author keywords

Auditory event related potentials; Cochlear implant; P3 potential; Phonetic processing; Postlingual adults; Speech perception

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTICS; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; BRAIN NERVE CELL; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; NEUROPHYSIOLOGY; PHONETICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPEECH DISCRIMINATION; SPEECH PERCEPTION; TASK PERFORMANCE; VOICE; VOWEL;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; AGED; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; DEAFNESS; EVENT-RELATED POTENTIALS, P300; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PHONETICS; REACTION TIME; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

EID: 51049086647     PISSN: 14203030     EISSN: 14219700     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000153434     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Beynon AJ, Snik AF, Stegeman DF, Van den Broek P: Discrimination of speech sound contrasts determined with behavioral tests and event-related potentials in cochlear implant recipients. J Am Acad Audiol 2005;16:42-53.
2. Boothroyd A: Statistical theory of speech discrimination score. J Acoust Soc Am 1968;43:362-367.
3. Donaldson GS, Kreft HA: Effects of vowel context on the recognition of initial and medial consonants by cochlear implant users. Ear Hear 2006;27:658-677.
4. Firszt JB, Chambers RD, Kraus N: Neurophysiology of cochlear implant users. II. Comparison among speech perception dynamic range, and physiological measures. Ear Hear 2002;23:516-531.
5. Fuchigami T, Okubo O, Fujita Y, Okuni M, Noguchi Y, Yamada T: Auditory event-related potentials and reaction time in children: evaluation of cognitive development. Dev Med Child Neurol 1993;35:230-237.
6. Gilley PM, Sharma A, Dorman M, Finley CC, Panch AS, Martin K: Minimization of cochlear implant stimulus artifact in cortical auditory evoked potentials. Clin Neurophysiol 2006;117:1772-1782.
7. Groenen PAP, Beynon AJ, Snik AFM, Van den Broek P: Speech evoked cortical potentials and speech recognition in cochlear implant users. Scand Audiol 2001;30:31-40.
8. Henkin Y, Kileny PR, Hildesheimer M, Kishon-Rabin L: Phonetic processing in children with cochlear implants: an auditory event-related potentials study. Ear Hear 2008;29:239-249.
9. Henkin Y, Kishon-Rabin L, Gadoth N, Pratt H: Auditory event-related potentials during phonetic and semantic processing in children. Audiol Neurootol 2002;7:228-239.
10. Hillyard SA, Kutas M: Electrophysiology of cognitive processing. Annu Rev Psychol 1983;34:33-61.
11. Jasper HH: The ten-twenty electrode system of the International Federation. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1958;10:371-375.
12. Kelly AS, Purdy SC, Thorne PR: Electrophysiological and speech perception measures of auditory processing in experienced adult cochlear implant users. Clin Neurophysiol 2005;116:1235-1246.
13. Kent RD: The Speech Sciences. San Diego, Singular Publishing Group, 1997.
14. Kileny PR, Boerst A, Zwolan T: Cognitive evoked potentials to speech and tonal stimuli in children with implants. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1997;117:161-169.
15. Kishon-Rabin L, Henkin Y: Age related changes in the visual perception of phonologically significant contrasts. Br J Audiol 2000;34:363-374.
16. Kishon-Rabin L, Recanati D, Ari-Even Roth D, Rotshtein S, Taitelbaum-Swead R, Hildesheimer M: Comparing the acoustic-to-phonetic level of processing in postlingual deafened adults with cochlear implants to that of normal hearing in quiet and in noise. 9th Int Conf on Cochlear Implants, Vienna 2006.
17. Kishon-Rabin L, Taitelbaum R, Muchnik C, Gehtler I, Kronenberg J, Hildesheimer M: Development of speech perception and production in children with cochlear implants. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2002;189:85-90.
18. Kraus N, McGee T, Carrell TD, Sharma A: Neurophysiologic bases of speech discrimination. Ear Hear 1995;16:19-37.
19. Kraus N, Micco AL, Koch DB, McGee T, Carrell T, Sharma A, Wiet RJ, Weingarten CZ: The Mismatch negativity cortical evoked potential elicited by speech in cochlear-implant users. Hear Res 1993;65:118-124.
20. Kutas M, Dale A: Electrical and magnetic readings of mental functions;in Rugg MD (ed): Cognitive Neuroscience. Cambridge, MIT Press, 1997, pp 197-242.
21. Kutas M, McCarthy G, Donchin E: Augmenting mental chronometry: the P300 as a measure of stimulus evaluation time. Science 1977;197:792-795.
22. Maiste AC, Wiens AS, Hunt MJ, Scherg M, Picton TW: Event-related potentials and the categorical perception of speech sounds. Ear Hear 1995;16:68-90.
23. Martin BA: Can the acoustic change complex be recorded in an individual with a cochlear implant? Separating neural responses from cochlear implant artifact. J Am Acad Audiol 2007;18:126-140.
24. Mayo C, Turk A: Adult-child differences in acoustic cue weighting are influenced by segmental context: children are not always perceptually biased toward transitions. J Acoust Soc Am 2004;115:3184-3194.
25. Micco AG, Kraus N, Koch DB, McGee TJ, Carrell TD, Sharma A, Nicol T, Wiet RJ: Speech-evoked cognitive P300 potentials in cochlear implant recipients. Am J Otol 1995;16:514-520.
26. Oldfield RC: The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh Inventory. Neuropsychologia 1971;9:97-113.
27. Polich J: Updating P300: an integrative theory of P3a and P3b. Clin Neurophysiol 2007;118:2128-2148.
28. Polich J, Herbst KL: P300 as a clinical assay: rationale, evolution, and findings. Int J Psychophysiol 2000;38:3-19.
29. Roman S, Canevet G, Lorenzi C, Triglia JM: Voice onset time encoding in patients with left and right cochlear implants. Neuroreport 2004;15:601-605.
30. Stapells D: Cortical ERPs to auditory stimuli; in Katz J (ed): Handbook of Clinical Audiology, ed 3. Baltimore, Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, 2002, pp 378-407.
31. Taitelbaum-Swead R, Hildesheimer M, Kishon-Rabin L: Effect of voice onset time (VOT), stop burst and vowel on the perception of voicing in Hebrew stops: preliminary results. J Basic Clin Physiol Pharmacol 2003;14:165-176.
32. Taitelbaum-Swead R, Kishon-Rabin L, Kaplan-Neeman R, Muchnik C, Kronenberg J, Hildesheimer M: Speech perception of children using Nucleus, Clarion or Med-El cochlear implants. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2005;69:1675-1683.
33. Wable J, Van den Abbeele T, Gallego S, Frachet B: Mismatch negativity: a tool for the assessment of stimuli discrimination in cochlear implant subjects. Clin Neurophysiol 2000;111:743-751.