Key future research questions on mediators and moderators of behaviour change processes for substance abuse

International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research

Volumn 17, Issue SUPPL. 1, 2008, Pages

  Rehm, Jürgen ^a,b,c,d,e  

^a DRESDEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

^b CENTRE FOR ADDICTION AND MENTAL HEALTH   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^d Institut fur Sucht und Gesundheitsforschung Zurich   (Switzerland)

^e NONE   (Canada)

Author keywords

Behavioural change; Mechanism; Research; Substance use disorders

Indexed keywords

ALCOHOL ABUSE; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR CHANGE; CANNABIS ADDICTION; CULTURAL FACTOR; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; DRUG ABUSE; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; GENE INTERACTION; HUMAN; RACE DIFFERENCE; SOCIAL ASPECT; SUBSTANCE ABUSE; ADDICTION; BEHAVIOR THERAPY; ENVIRONMENT; GENETICS; GENOTYPE; METHODOLOGY; PHENOTYPE;

BEHAVIOR THERAPY; ENVIRONMENT; GENOTYPE; HUMANS; PHENOTYPE; SUBSTANCE-RELATED DISORDERS;

EID: 50949095245     PISSN: 10498931     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/mpr.243     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, text revision. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association, 2000.
2. Arminger G, Clogg CC, Sobel ME. Handbook of Statistical Modeling for the Social and Behavioural Sciences. New York: Plenum, 1995.
3. Babor T, Caetano R, Casswell S, Edwards G, Giesbrecht N, Graham K et al. Alcohol: No Ordinary Commodity. Research and Public Policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.
4. Campbell DT. Reforms as experiments. Am J Psychol 1969; 24: 409-29.
5. Campbell DT. Assessing the Impact of Planned Social Change. Hanover, NH: Dartmouth College, 1976.
6. Chisholm D, Rehm J, van Ommeren M, Monteiro M. Reducing the global burden of hazardous alcohol use: a comparative cost-effectiveness analysis. J Stud Alcohol 2004; 65: 782-93.
7. Compton WM, Cottler LB, Dorsey KB, Spitznagel L, Mager DE. Comparing assessments of DSM-IV substance dependence disorders using CIDI-SAM and SCAN. Drug Alcohol Depend 1996; 41: 179-87.
8. Degenhardt L, Hall W, Warner-Smith M, Lynskey M. Illiicit drug use. In Ezzati M, Lopez A, Rodgers A, Murray CJL (eds) Comparative Quantification of Health Risks: Global and Regional Burden of Disease Attributable to Selected Major Risk Factors. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2004.
9. Demyttenaere K, Bruffaerts R, Posada-Villa J, Gasquet I, Kovess V, Lepine JP et al. Prevalence, severity, and unmet need for treatment of mental disorders in the World Health Organization World Mental Health Surveys. JAMA 2004; 291: 2581-90.
10. European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA). National Prevalence Estimates of Problem Drug Use in the European Union, 1995-2000. Lisbon: EMCDDA, 2003.
11. Grant BF, Harford TC, Muthen BO, Yi HY, Hasin DS, Stinson FS. DSM-IV alcohol dependence and abuse: Further evidence of validity in the general population. Drug Alcohol Depend 2007; 86: 154-66.
12. Grant BF, Compton WM, Crowley TJ, Hasin DS, Helzer JE, Li T, Rounsaville BJ, Volkow ND, Woody GE. Errors in assessing DSM-IV substance use disorders. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2007; 64: 379-380.
13. Greenland S. Basic problems in interaction assessment. Environ Health Perspect 1993; 101: 59-66.
14. Hasin DS, Liu X, Adlerson D, Grant BF. DSM-IV alcohol dependence: a categorical or dimensional phenotype? Psychol Med 2006; 1-11.
15. Hser Y, Hoffman V, Grella C, Anglin M. A 33-year follow-up of narcotics addicts. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2001; 58: 503-8.
16. Lachman HM. An overview of the genetics of substance use disorders. Curr Psychiatry Rep 2006; 8: 133-43.
17. Muthen B. Latent variable modeling with longitudinal and multilevel data. In Raftery A (ed.) Sociological Methodology. Boston, MA: Blackwell Publishers, 1997.
18. Muthen B. Should substance use disorders be considered as categorical or dimensional? Addiction 2006; 101: 6-16.
19. Muthen B, Asparouhov T. Item response mixture modeling: application to tobacco dependence criteria. Addict Behav 2006; 31: 1050-66.
20. Muthen B, Muthen L. The development of heavy drinking and alcohol-related problems from ages 18 to 37 in a U.S. national sample. J Stud Alcohol 2000; 61: 290-300.
21. Muthen B, Asparouhov T, Rebollo I. Advances in behavioural genetics modelling using Mplus: applications of factor mixture modeling to twin data. Twin Res Hum Genet 2006; 9: 313-24.
22. Pull CB, Saunders JB, Mavreas V, Cottler LB, Grant BF. Concordance between ICD-10 alcohol and drug use disorder criteria and diagnoses as measured by the AUDADISADR, CIDI and SCAN: results of a cross-national study. Drug Alcohol Depend 1997; 47: 207-16.
23. Rehm J. Gesellschaftsreform als soziales experiment - Ein unzetgemabes projekt oder der Ausweg aus erstarrten Sachzwangen in der alkoholpolitik [The effects of Nordic-alcohol policies. What happens to drinking and harm when alcohol control change]. Sucht 2003; 49: 129-30.
24. Rehm J, Room R, van den Brink W, Jacobi F. Alcohol use disorders in EU countries and Norway: an overview of the epidemiology. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 2005a; 15: 377-88.
25. Rehm J, Room R, van den Brink W, Kraus L. Problematic drug use and drug use disorders in EU countries and Norway: an overview of the epidemiology. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 2005b; 15: 389-97.
26. Rehm J, Room R, Graham K, Monteiro M, Gmel G, Sempos CT. The relationship of average volume of alcohol consumption and patterns of drinking to burden of disease - an overview. Addiction 2003; 98: 1209-28.
27. Room R. Alcohol and drug disorders in the International Classification of Diseases: a shifting kaleidoscope. Drug Alcohol Rev 1998; 17: 305-17.
28. Rounsaville BJ, Kendall B, Babor T, Kranzler H, Kadden R. Cross system agreement for substance use ddisorders: DSM-III-R, DSM-IV and ICD-10. Addiction 1993; 88: 337-48.
29. Singer JD, Willett JB. Applied Longitudinal Data Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press, 2003.
30. United Nations Drug Control Programme (UNDCP). Global Illicit Drug Trends 2000. Vienna: UNDCP, 2000.
31. Üstün BT, Compton W, Mager D, Babor T, Baiyewu O, Chatterji S et al. WHO study on the reliability and validity of the alcohol and drug use disorder instruments. Overview of methods and results. Drug Alcohol Depend 1997; 47: 161-9.
32. Vaillant GE. Natural History of Alcoholism Revisited. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1995.
33. Vaillant GE. Natural history of addiction and pathways to recovery. In Graham AW, Schultz TK, Wilford BB (eds) Principles of Addiction Medicine. Chevy Chase, MD: American Society of Addiction Medicine, Inc., 1998.
34. Vaillant GE. 60-year follow-up of alcoholic men. Addiction 2003; 98: 1043-51.
35. World Health Organization (WHO). The ICD-10 Classification of Mental and Behavioural Disorders: Diagnostic Criteria for Research. Geneva: World Health Organization, 1993.