Esthetic grafting for small volume hard and soft tissue contour defects for implant site development

Implant Dentistry

Volumn 17, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 136-141

  Le, Bach ^a   Burstein, Jeffrey ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Dental implants; Onlay grafting; Papilla regeneration

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BONE TRANSPLANTATION; GINGIVA; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; ORAL SURGERY; OSTEOLYSIS; PHYSIOLOGY; REGENERATION; TOOTH EXTRACTION; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH SOCKET;

ALVEOLAR BONE LOSS; ALVEOLOPLASTY; BONE TRANSPLANTATION; DENTAL IMPLANTATION, ENDOSSEOUS; DENTAL IMPLANTS, SINGLE-TOOTH; GINGIVA; HUMANS; REGENERATION; TOOTH EXTRACTION; TOOTH SOCKET;

EID: 50949093323     PISSN: 10566163     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/ID.0b013e318174db99     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Kois JC. Predictable single tooth peri-implant esthetics: Five diagnostic keys. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2001; 22:199-206.
2. Wennstrom JL, Bengazi F, Lekholm U. The influence of the masticatory mucosa on the peri-implant soft tissue condition. Clin Oral Impl Res. 1994;5:1-8.
3. Artzi Z, Tal H, Moses O, et al. Mucosal considerations for osseointegrated implants. J Prosthet Dent. 1993;70:427-432.
4. Langer B, Calagna L. The subepithe-lial connective tissue graft: A new approach to the enhancement of anterior cosmetics. J Prosthet Dent. 1980;44:363-367.
5. Seibert J. Reconstruction of deformed partially edentulous ridges, using full thickness onlay grafts. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 1983;4:437-453.
6. Sullivan HC, Atkins JH. Free autogenous gingival grafts. 3. Utilization of grafts in the treatment of gingival recession. Periodontics. 1968;6:152-160.
7. Harris RJ. A comparative study of root coverage obtained with an acellular dermal matrix versus a connective tissue graft: Results of 107 recession defects in 50 consecutively treated patients. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2000;20:51-59.
8. Cummings LC, Kaldahl WB, Allen EP. Histologic evaluation of autogenous connective tissue and acellular dermal matrix grafts in humans. J Periodontol. 2005; 76:178-186.
9. Nemcovsky CE, Moses O. Rotated palatal flap. A surgical approach to increase keratinized tissue width in Maxillary implant uncovering: Technique and clinical evaluation. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2002;22:607-612.
10. Sclar A. Soft Tissue and Esthetic Considerations in Implant Therapy. Surrey, UK: Quintessence Publishing; 2003;163-187.
11. Bahat O. Interrelations of soft and hard tissues for osseointegrated implants. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 1996;17: 1161-1170.
12. Minsk L. The use of acellular dermal connective-tissue graft for root coverage in periodontal plastic surgery. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2004;25: 170-176.
13. Wennstrom JL. Mucogingival therapy. Ann Periodontol. 1996;1:671-701.
14. de Trey E, Bernimoulin JP. Influence of free gingival grafts on the health of the marginal gingiva. J Clin Periodontol. 1980;7:381-393.
15. Goodacre CJ. Gingival esthetics. J Prosthet Dent. 1990;64:1-12.
16. Karlsen K. Gingival reactions to dental restorations. Acta Odontol Scand. 1970;28:895-904.
17. Garber DA, Belser UC. Restorative-driven implant placement with restoration-generated site development. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 1995;1:796-804.
18. Phillips K, Kois JC. Aesthetic peri-implant site development. The restorative connection. Dent Clin North Am. 1998;42:57-70.
19. Misch CE. Contemporary Implant Dentistry. 2nd ed. St. Louis, MO: CV Mosby; 1999;393-394.
20. Tarnow DP, Eskow RN. Considerations for single-unit esthetic implant restorations. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 1995;16:778-788.
21. Shaban M. Soft tissue closure over immediate implants: Classification and review of surgical techniques. Implant Dent. 2004;13:33-41.
22. Simion M, Misitano U, Gionso L, et al. Treatment of dehiscences and fenes-tration around dental implants using resorb-able and nonresorbable membranes associated with bone autografts: A comparative clinical study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1997;12:159-167.
23. Block MS, Degen M. Horizontal ridge augmentation using human mineralized partic-ulate bone: Preliminary results. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004;62(9 suppl 2):67-72.
24. Hellem S, Astrand P, Stenstrom B, et al. Implant treatment in combination with lateral augmentation of the alveolar process: A 3-year prospective study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2003;5:233-246.
25. Palacci P, Ericsson I, Engstrand P, et al. Optimal Implant Positioning and Soft Tissue Management for the Branemark System. Chicago: Quintessence; 1995;59-70.
26. Johnson K. A study of the dimensional changes occurring in the maxilla following tooth extraction. Aust Dent J. 1969; 14:241-244.
27. Atwood DA, Coy WA. Clinical, cephalometric, and densitometric study of reduction in residual ridges. J Prosthet Dent. 1971;26:280-295.
28. Spray JR, Black CG, Morris HF, et al. The influence of bone thickness on facial marginal bone response: Stage 1 placement through stage 2 uncovering. Ann Periodontol. 2000;5:119-128.
29. Le B, Burstein J, Sedghizadeh PP. Cortical tenting grafting technique in the severely atrophic alveolar ridge for implant site preparation. Implant Dent. 2008;17:40-50.
30. Frost HM. The regional acceleratory phenomenon: A review. Henry Ford Hosp Med J. 1983;31:3-9.