Object categorization based on kernel principal component analysis of visual words

2008 IEEE Workshop on Applications of Computer Vision, WACV

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages

  Hotta, Kazuhiro ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ELECTRO COMMUNICATIONS   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION); COMPUTER NETWORKS; COMPUTER VISION; FINANCIAL DATA PROCESSING; IMAGE PROCESSING; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINES;

LOCAL FEATURES; OBJECT CATEGORIZATION; VISUAL WORD;

PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS;

EID: 50949085049     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/WACV.2008.4543993     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (32)

1. Caltech101. http://www.visiono.caltech.edu/Image_Datasets/ Caltech101/Caltech101.html.
2. T. Balachander and R. Kothari. Kernel based subspace pattern classification. In Proc. International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, volume 5, pages 3119-3122, 1999.
3. G. Csurka, C. Dance, L. Fan, J. Willamowski, and C. Bray. Visual categoraization with bags of keypoints. In Proc. ECCVWorkshop on Statistical Learning in Computer Vision, pages 1-16, 2004.
4. N. Dalal and B. Trigs. Histogram of oriented gradients for human detection. In Proc. IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 886-893, 2005.
5. R. Debnath and H. Takahashi. Kernel selection for the support vector machine. IEICE Trans. Info. & Syst., E87-D(12):2903-2904, 2004.
6. L. Fei-Fei, R. Fergus, and P. Perona. Learning generative visual models from few training examples: An incremental baysian approach tested on 101 object categories. In Proc. CVPR Workshop of Generative Model Based Vision, 2004.
7. L. Fei-Fei, R. Fergus, and P. Perona. One-shot learning of object categories. IEEE Trans. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 28(4):594-611, 2006.
8. K. Fukui, B. Stenger, and O. Yamaguchi. A framework for 3d object recognition using the kernel constrained mutual subspace method. In Proc. Asian Conference on Computer Vision, volume I, pages 315-324, 2006.
9. K. Grauman and T. Darrell. Discriminative classification with sets of image features. In Proc. International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 1458-1465, 2005.
10. C. Harris and M. Stephens. A combined corner and edge detector. In Proc. Alvey Vision Conference, pages 147-151, 1998.
11. E. Hjelmas and B. Low. Face detection: A survey. Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 83(2):236-274, 2001.
12. A. Holub, M. Welling, and P. Perona. Combining generative models and fisher kernels for object recogntion. In Proc. International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 136-143, 2005.
13. K. Hotta. View independent face recognition based on kernel principal component analysis of local parts. In Proc. IEEE International Conference on Image Processing, volume III, pages 760-763, 2005.
14. C.-W. Hsu and C.-J. Lin. A comparison of methods for multiclass support vector machines. IEEE Trans. Neural Networks, 13(2):415-425, 2002.
15. M. Ichino, H. Sakano, and N. Komatsu. A study on speed up of kernel mutual subspace method. In Proc. Meeting on Image Recognition and Understanding, pages 1035-1042, 2005 (in Japanese).
16. T. Kadir and M. Brady. Scale, saliency and image description. International Journal of Computer Vision, 45(2):83-105, 2001.
17. S. Lazebnik, C. Schmid, and J. Ponce. Beyond bags of features: Spatial pyramid matching for recognizing natural scene categories. In Proc. IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 2169-2178, 2006.
18. D. Lowe. Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints. International Journal of Computer Vision, 60(2):91-110, 2004.
19. J. Milgram, M. Cheriet, and R. Sabourin. One against one or one against all: Which one is better for handwriting recognition with svms? In Proc. 10th International Workshop on Frontiers in Handwriting Recognition, 2006.
20. K.-R. Müller, S. Mika, G. Rätsch, K. Tsuda, and B. Schölkopf. An introduction to kernel-based learning algorithms. IEEE Trans. Neural Networks, 12(2):181-201, 2001.
21. J. Mutch and D.Lowe. Multiclass object recognition using sparse, localized features. In Proc. IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 11-18, 2006.
22. S. Obdržálek and J. Matas. Object recognition using local affine frames on distigushed regions. In Proc. British Machine Vision Conference, volume 1, pages 113-122, 2002.
23. M. Pontil and A. Verri. Support vector machines for 3d object recognition. IEEE Trans. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 20(6):637-646, 1998.
24. B. Schölkopf, C.J.C.Burges, and A. Smola. Advances in kernel methods: support vector learning. MIT Press, 1998.
25. T. Serre, L. Wolf, and T. Poggio. Object recognition with features inspired by visual cortex. In Proc. IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 994-1000, 2005.
26. J. Shawe-Taylor and N. Cristianini. Kernel Methods for Pattern Analysis. Cambridge University Press, 2004.
27. A. Smola, O. Mangasarian, and B. Schölkopf. Sparse kernel feature analysis. Technical report, 99-04, The University of Wisconsin, 1999.
28. H. Suzuki, Y. Waizumi, N. Kato, and Y.Nemoto. A discriminant method of similar characters with nonlinear compound discriminant function. IEICE Trans. Information and Systems, E88-D(4):704-715, 2005 (in Japanese).
29. M. Tipping. Sparse kernel principal component analysis. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 13, pages 633-639, 2001.
30. G.Wang, Y. Zhang, and L. Fei-Fei. Using dependent regions for object categorization in a generative framework. In Proc. IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 1597-1604, 2006.
31. H. Zhang, A. Berg, M. Maire, and J. Malik. Svm-knn: Discriminative nearest neighbor classification for visual category recognition. In Proc. IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 2126-2136, 2006.
32. W. Zhao, R. Chellappa, P. Phillips, and A. Rosenfeld. Face recognition: A literature survey. ACM Computing Surveys, 35(4):399-458, 2003. 1